Chloeia rosea Potts, 1909

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2023, Revision of Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (Annelida, Amphinomidae), Zootaxa 5238 (1), pp. 1-134 : 106-108

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:768E9932-2D18-4115-8359-3FF800328BCD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7622015

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C79010-FF9F-D774-FF70-7D2C223EFDD6

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chloeia rosea Potts, 1909
status

 

Chloeia rosea Potts, 1909 View in CoL

Fig. 50 View FIGURE 50

Chloeia rosea Potts, 1909: 357–358 View in CoL , Pl. 45, Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ; Fauvel 1932: 57; Fauvel 1953: 97–98, Fig. 46h View FIGURE 46 (partim, RV Investigator, Sta. 242 is C. tumida Baird, 1868 View in CoL ); Hartman 1959: 132.

Chloeia tumida?: Monro 1937: 253 View in CoL (3 small juveniles from Maldives).

Type material. Indian Ocean, Amirante Islands. Holotype ( BMNH 1924.3.1.145), HMS Sealark, station not indicated, associated with a purple alcyonarian, 54 m, Oct. 1905, J.S. Gardiner, coll. (Note: Cooper (1909) recorded three species of Antipathes Pallas, 1766b for the Amiral Islands from the same expedition).

Diagnosis. Chloeia with pinnate branchiae from chaetiger 5, progressively smaller posteriorly; dorsum pink, without pigmentation pattern; anterior eyes slightly larger than posterior ones; caruncle with about 10 folds; notochaetae furcates and harpoon chaetae without spurs; neurochaetae furcates.

Description. Holotype (BMNH 1924.3.1.145), with body fusiform, 10.5 mm long, 3 mm wide, 20 chaetigers.

Holotype whitish, including chaetae ( Fig. 50A View FIGURE 50 ); anterior prostomial margin blackish; dorsal cirri and branchiae pale. Venter brownish, midventral band paler, double; lips inner surface greenish.

Prostomium anteriorly entire. Eyes blackish, anterior eyes slightly larger than posterior ones. Median antenna inserted at anterior caruncular margin, as long as caruncle ( Fig. 50B View FIGURE 50 ), 3× longer than lateral antennae. Lateral antennae bases separate from each other, slightly longer than palps. Mouth ventral on chaetiger 2. Pharynx not exposed.

Caruncle pale, sigmoid, trilobed, tapered, reaching chaetiger 4. Median ridge plicate, with about 12 vertical folds, partially concealing lateral lobes. Lateral lobes narrow, with about 16 vertical folds.

Pinnate branchiae from chaetiger 5, continued throughout body, convergent towards posterior region; progressively smaller posteriorly, longer than following segments in anterior ( Fig. 50C View FIGURE 50 ) and median segments; in posterior segments as long as 1.5× successive segments. Median segments with 6–7 lateral branches (all without secondary branches, hence pinnate, not bipinnate).

Parapodia biramous, notopodia with cirriform branchiae along chaetigers 1–4, ¼–1/2 as long as dorsal cirri. Dorsal cirri slightly longer than bipinnate branchiae along median chaetigers, 2–3× longer in posterior chaetigers. Second ventral cirri with cirrophores slightly longer and wider, and cirrostyle slightly longer than adjacent ones, directed dorsally. Other ventral cirri directed ventrolaterally, as long as one subsequent segment.

Chaetae soft, most complete; distal fragile hoods and chaetal cortex variably eroded. Notochaetae in anterior chaetigers furcates ( Fig. 50D View FIGURE 50 ), major tines 4—5× longer than minor ones. Median chaetigers with 2 types of notochaetae ( Fig. 50F View FIGURE 50 ): furcates with smooth tines, major tines 3× longer than minor ones, and harpoon-chaetae with bifurcation region pigmented, denticulate tine 3—4× longer than smooth ones. Neurochaetae all furcates, anterior chaetigers with major tines 4× longer than minor ones ( Fig. 50E View FIGURE 50 ); median chaetigers with furcates and furcate capillaries ( Fig. 50G View FIGURE 50 ), major tines 3–5× longer than minor ones.

Posterior region tapered; pygidium with anus terminal; anal cirri lost (color, shape and size unknown).

Live pigmentation (from original description). Body reddish including chaetae. No other pigmentation features were given in the description.

Remarks. Chloeia rosea Potts, 1909 was described from the Indian Ocean; it is unique among Chloeia species by having pinnate branchiae, instead of being bipinnate like in the other species. There are three other species having branchiae from chaetiger 5, and without dorsal pigmentation pattern: C. longisetosa Potts, 1909 from the Indian Ocean, C. slapcinskyi sp. n., and C. wangi , the two latter ones from The Philippines. However, these three species have bipinnate branchiae, not pinnate, as in C. rosea .

The species was described with a small specimen (11 mm long, 20 segments) with reddish pink pigmentation, and it was found associated with a purple alcyonarian ( Potts 1909: 358). Regretfully, there were not enough details about the potential symbiont in the narrative for the expedition ( Gardiner & Cooper 1907a, b), nor in the account of the alcyonarians ( Cooper 1909). The relationship between these two species groups is quite interesting because most Chloeia species are regarded as free living, digging in sediments. From the original description, it was indicated that branchiae were convergent and long enough as to touch each other dorsally, and the illustration shows them with lateral branches tapered, clearly separated from each other, and this is confirmed in the holotype.

Distribution. Only known from the Admiral Islands, Indian Ocean, associated with alcyonarians, in substrates at 54 m depth.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Amphinomida

Family

Amphinomidae

SubFamily

Archinominae

Genus

Chloeia

Loc

Chloeia rosea Potts, 1909

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2023
2023
Loc

Chloeia tumida?: Monro 1937: 253

Monro, C. C. A. 1937: 253
1937
Loc

Chloeia rosea

Hartman, O. 1959: 132
Fauvel, P. 1953: 97
Fauvel, P. 1932: 57
Potts, F. A. 1909: 358
1909
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF