Liocosmius Casey, 1918
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.11067242 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12627933 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C82573-4418-A56B-88C6-19AC0BC4FE6B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Liocosmius Casey |
status |
|
Subgenus Liocosmius Casey
Type species Ochthedromus mundus LeConte (1852) , designated by Lindroth (1963).
A revision of Liocosmius is provided in Maddison and Cooper (2014). The species described here as Bembidion cachagua became known shortly before the publication of that work, but it was not recognized as a Liocosmius until after a genitalic dissection and DNA sequencing revealed that it belonged to the subgenus. Within Liocosmius , B. cachagua is unusual for its microsculptured pronotum and head, rugose pronotum (at least in the posterior portion), low-contrast color pattern on the elytra, and slight metallic sheen on elytra. The species can be identified in the key provided by Maddison and Cooper (2014) if an additional couplet is added at the beginning:
0. Evident microsculpture throughout dorsal surface of head (except, in some specimens, between eyes near midline), and over most of the pronotum; microsculpture near apex of elytra evident as distinct sculpticells that are only slightly transverse. Ground color of elytra brown, slightly depigmented, contrasting only weakly with pale spots ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE ). Entire dorsal surface with slight yellow-green or brown-green metallic sheen, including on the elytra. Appendages infuscated. Posterior region of pronotum evidently wrinkled, at least medially, and with many punctures ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE )............................ B. cachagua sp. nov.
— Most of the dorsal surface of head without microsculpture; pronotum with at most weak, very transverse microsculpture restricted to lateral margins; microsculpture absent from apex of elytra or consisting of very transverse sculpticells. If ground color of elytra brown and contrasting only weakly with pale spots, then appendages testaceous, not infuscated ( Maddison and Cooper 2014, Fig. 2 View FIGURE ). Elytra without metallic sheen. Posterior region of pronotum smoother (e.g., Maddison and Cooper 2014, Fig. 7 View FIGURE )............................... 1
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.