Microhoria depressa (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) Kejval & Chandler, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2020.007 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7990B912-A3D4-40F7-B143-772FFDB5A119 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C8343F-AA09-105E-FF6E-8B7FC61DF962 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Microhoria depressa (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Microhoria depressa (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov.
( Figs 96 View Figs 96–99. 96–98 , 162 View Figs 151–163. 151–155 )
Anthicus View in CoL depressus LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849b: 156.
Anthicus View in CoL depressus: LAFERTÉ- SÉNECTÈRE (1849c): 255 (repeated description); PIC (1911b): 43 (catalogue); WINKLER (1927): 845 (catalogue). Tenuicollis depressus: CHANDLER et al. (2008): 448 (catalogue, distribution); TELNOV & GHAHARI (2018): 484 (note).
Anthicus mollis Desbrochers des Loges, 1875: 46 , syn. nov.
Anthicus mollis : PIC (1911b): 61 (catalogue).
Anthicus (Immicrohoria) mollis : WINKLER (1927): 849 (catalogue).
Microhoria mollis : CHANDLER et al. (2008): 441 (catalogue, distribution); TELNOV & GHAHARI (2018): 483 View Cited Treatment (note); TELNOV (2018a): 271 View Cited Treatment (record Russia).
Type locality. Anthicus depressus – Caucasus Mountains (‘Caucasus’);
A. mollis – Southern Russia (‘ Russie mérid.’).
Type material. Anthicus depressus – LECTOTYPE (herewith designated):, ‘Depressus mihi Caucasus. [h; pinned separately]’ ( MNHN).
Anthicus mollis – SYNTYPES (see Remarks): 1 ♀, ‘Sarepta [h] // TYPE [p; red label]’; 1 ♀, ‘Sarepta Desbr [h] // TYPE [p; red label]’ (both NHMW). Additional material. ARMENIA: 8 6 ♀♀, Kotayk prov., 4 km S of Hatsavan, 23.vi.2004, Putckhov lgt. ( ADBC, ZKDC); 1 ♀, Yerevan, 17.vi.–4.vii.1988, O. Hovorka lgt. ( ZKDC). AZERBAIJAN: 1 2 ♀♀, 90 km N of Baku, Zarat env., 15.vi.1983, V. Kubáň lgt. ( ZKDC); 1, Georgia, Tbilisi, Lisie Lake, vi.1957, Dlabola lgt. ( NMPC). RUSSIA: 1, Volgograd [‘Sarepta’ no date], Becker lgt. ( NHMW).
Diagnosis. Microhoria terminata species-group; small, brownish, subparallel species. Male sternum VII simple; sternum VIII forming paired subtriangular sclerites that are evenly rounded and setose apically; tergum VII and VIII simple; aedeagus ( Fig. 96 View Figs 96–99. 96–98 ). Female sternum VII simple; tergum VII with deep apical notch ( Fig. 162 View Figs 151–163. 151–155 ).
Variation. Body length (♀) 2.3–2.7 mm.
Distribution. Azerbaijan, Armenia (new record), Georgia (new record), Southern Russia, Iran.
Remarks. LAFERTÉ- SÉNECTÈRE (1849b) described Anthicus depressus from two specimens provided by M. de Chaudoir. There is a single syntype deposited in his collection (MNHN), as is indicated by the handwritten inventory on the inner side of the respective box, and is selected as the Lectotype. Jules Desbrochers des Loges was an insect dealer whose Coleoptera collection is scattered ( HORN et al. 1990), and type specimens of his Anthicidae species are difficult to recognize. He described Anthicus mollis from an unstated number of specimens collected by Alexander Becker in southern Russia ( DESBROCHERS DES LOGES 1875). The two syntypes examined appear to be newly labelled; at least their ‘TYPE’ labels are not original, being identical to those used by H. von Krekich-Strassoldo. For these reasons, we refrained from designation of a lectotype. Neverthless, the specimens originate from southern Russia and agree with the original description in the following important characters: head and pronotum distinctly punctate, head widely rounded to subtruncate posteriorly, elytra flattened, their lateral margins straight and apices subtruncate, and female tergum VII deeply notched apically (‘pygidium sillonné longitudinalement’). These are, moreover, distinguishing characters of M. mollis that are useful for separation from the externally similar M. caspia; the latter was described from material collected by A. Becker at the locality ‘Sarepta’ (= presently Krasnoarmeyskiy Rayon (district) of Volgograd) in the same region, and it is a well-known species, being represented by numerous topotypic specimens in MNHN (coll. Pic) and NHMW.
The examined specimens of Anthicus mollis were found to be identical with those of A. depressus, and consequently these species names are newly treated as synonyms.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Microhoria depressa (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849)
Kejval, Zbyněk & Chandler, Donald S. 2020 |
Microhoria mollis
TELNOV D. & GHAHARI H. 2018: 483 |
TELNOV D. 2018: 271 |
CHANDLER D. S. & UHMANN G. & NARDI G. & TELNOV D. 2008: 441 |
Anthicus (Immicrohoria) mollis
WINKLER A. 1927: 849 |
Anthicus
TELNOV D. & GHAHARI H. 2018: 484 |
CHANDLER D. S. & UHMANN G. & NARDI G. & TELNOV D. 2008: 448 |
WINKLER A. 1927: 845 |
PIC M. 1911: 43 |
Anthicus mollis
PIC M. 1911: 61 |
Anthicus mollis
DESBROCHERS DES LOGES J. 1875: 46 |
Anthicus
LAFERTE-SENECTERE F. T. DE 1849: 156 |