Microhoria oedipus (Chevrolat, 1860)

Kejval, Zbyněk & Chandler, Donald S., 2020, Generic revision of the Microhoriini with new species and synonymies from the Palaearctic Region (Coleoptera: Anthicidae), Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 60 (1), pp. 95-154 : 124-125

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2020.007

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7990B912-A3D4-40F7-B143-772FFDB5A119

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C8343F-AA32-1066-FC7F-8FFFC202FC36

treatment provided by

Tatiana

scientific name

Microhoria oedipus
status

 

Microhoria oedipus species-group

Diagnosis. Robust species, showing usually more distinct sexual dimorphism ( Fig. 139 View Figs 138–150. 138–147 ), mostly with modified elytral setation (swirled setae, setose bands); rather stable in pronotal characters, with distinct and longer setose latero-basal impressions. Mesoventrite with partly bordered lateral margins (sulcus absent laterally), and well-developed longitudinal submedian carinae ( Figs 13, 14 View Figs 7–14 ); setose fringe of mesepimera well-developed ( Fig. 33 View Figs 31–38. 31 ); submarginal setose impressions of metaventrite and abdominal sternum III conspicuous; metatibiae more or less swollen and modified in males, with two terminal spurs; male metafemora with a row of coarser setae on inner side (at least in some species); elytral apices in males conspicuously modified, subtruncate to more or less strongly excavate and lobed, with scattered secretory pores ( Fig. 43 View Figs 39–46. 39, 40 ). Aedeagus ( Figs 76, 77 View Figs 74–77 ): tegmen hood-like, with simple pointed apex (‘cuculliform’); gonopore free.

Distribution. Northern Africa ( Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia). Species included (13 spp.). Microhoria admirabilis ( Pic, 1894), M. biauriculata (Pic, 1920), M. fortissima ( Pic, 1894), M. leprieuri ( Baudi di Selve, 1877), M. lobata (Pic, 1905), M. normandi (Pic, 1915), M. obuncata Normand, 1950, M. oedipus (Chevrolat, 1860) , M. sicardi ( Pic, 1893), M. subtruncata (Pic, 1920), M. succinta ( Chevrolat, 1877), M. tunisica ( Pic, 1893), and M. valga (Fairmaire, 1875).

Remarks. This group holds the species formerly treated as Microhoria sensu stricto. They are undoubtedly closely related to members of the M. fasciata species-group, but differ by the more conspicuous sexual dimorphism. However, it should be stated, that both modifications of metatibiae and elytral apices of males in this group are variably developed and most of the above listed species were only briefly examined or included on the basis of original descriptions.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Anthicidae

Genus

Microhoria

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF