Diphtherophora, de Man, 1880
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A7130F59-3476-4B16-A5F5-83DEB1D263E1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699016 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887C1-F83B-C22B-FF1E-AC861DD8C4DF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Diphtherophora |
status |
|
Diphtherophora sp.
( Figs 6 D View FIGURE 6 ; 7 B, H View FIGURE 7 ; 8 C, D View FIGURE 8 ; 9 C, D View FIGURE 9 )
Measurements. See Table 3 View TABLE 3 .
The morphological and morphometric characters of our population fit with those of the original description of D. malkovi ( Nedelchev & Choleva, 1989) , but the secretory-excretory pore position is more posterior in females (90–109 vs 59–80 µm) and males (94.5 vs 62–75 µm), the body is more obese (a = 12.8 vs 17–27) and the spicules are slightly smaller (26 vs 27–32 µm). It also similar to D. kazachstani , D. sachalinensis Eroshenko & Tepljakov, 1977 , D. bulgarica Katalan-Gateva & Aleksiev, 1988 and D. obesa . It differs from these four species in having two ventromedian precloacal supplements and two cervical papillae in males ( D. kazachstani and D. bulgarica without supplements, D. sachalinensis and D. obesa with one supplement; all without cervical papillae). It also differs from all except D. bulgarica , in having a non-digitate tail in females and males.
The two females and single male of this population were collected from weeds around oak trees in Langrud, Gilan province, northern Iran. Complete identification was not possible due to the low number of specimens and having no significant morphological differences from known species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |