Poecilochroa hamipalpis ( Kroneberg, 1875 ) Fomichev & Marusik, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4966.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:965D0D18-2753-46E2-8D68-45D251485B06 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4738749 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987A6-FFFA-641A-769F-71B1FE497A8C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Poecilochroa hamipalpis ( Kroneberg, 1875 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Poecilochroa hamipalpis ( Kroneberg, 1875) View in CoL comb. n.
Figs 22–29 View FIGURES 22–27 View FIGURES 28–32 , 65–66 View FIGURES 65–66 .
Melanophora hamipalpis Kroneberg, 1875: 24 , pl. 2, fig 3 (♂).
Leptodrassus hamipalpis: Simon 1893: 363 .
Echemus hamipalpis: Dalmas 1919: 250 View in CoL .
Material examined. TAJIKISTAN, Khatlon Region: 1♂ ( ZMMU), Dangara Distr, SW slope of Sanglogh (= Sanglok) Mt. Range , 38°13.091’N, 69°14.282’E, 1362 m, 30.04.2015 (Y.M. Marusik) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. The species is similar to the European species P. furcata Simon, 1914 , from which it can be separated by the ventral branch of the tibial apophysis (Vb) directed forward (vs. directed downward), short prolateral fold (Pf) of conductor (Cn) and by having a projection (Pb) on the base of embolus (Eb) (cf. Figs 22–23, 26 View FIGURES 22–27 and figs 3–4 in Di Franco (2001)).
Comment. This species was treated in three taxonomic publications and previously known from original figures only.
Description. Male. Habitus as in Fig. 29 View FIGURES 28–32 . Total length 6.2. Carapace: 2.8 long, 2.05 wide. Coloration. Carapace, sternum, labium, maxillae and chelicerae brown. Legs and palps brown, legs III and IV lighter. Abdomen beigegray with brown scutum. Spinnerets gray. Leg spination: I: Fe: d1-1-1, p0-0-1; Ti v0-0-2; Mt v2-0-0. II: Fe d1-1-1, p0-1-1; Ti v0-0-2; Mt v2-0-0. III: Fe d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r0-0-1; Pt r1; Ti d1-0-0, p1-1-1, r1-0-1, v1-1-2; Mt d0-1-0, p0-1-0, r1-0-0, v0-2-0; IV: Fe d1-1-0, p0-0-1, r0-0-2; Ti p2-0-1, r0-0-1, v3-1-2; Mt d0-2-0, p2-1-0, r2-1-0, v3-2-0. Leg measurements. I: 6.41 (1.95, 1.15, 1.4, 1.18, 0.73); II: 6.31 (1.9, 1.1, 1.38, 1.2, 0.73); III: 5.54 (1.8, 0.93, 0.71, 1.35, 0.75); IV: 7.59 (2.1, 1.05, 1.63, 1.98, 0.83).
Palp as in Figs 22–27 View FIGURES 22–27 , 28 View FIGURES 28–32 . Tibial apophysis splits into short, triangular dorsal branch (Db) and long, digitiform and straight ventral branch; tegulum ovate, with an indistinct constriction in the middle part; sperm duct (Sd) forming one loop; petal-shaped, membranous conductor (Cn) envelopes embolus prolaterally; embolus sharply pointed, with a wide square base (Eb).
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. Uzbekistan and southwestern Tajikistan (new record).
Comments. The new combination is proposed based on the large retrolateral tibial apophysis divided into branches and short apical embolus partly entwined by membranous conductor, which is similar to those known in Poecilochroa Westring, 1874 .
ZMMU |
Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Poecilochroa hamipalpis ( Kroneberg, 1875 )
Fomichev, Alexander A. & Marusik, Yuri M. 2021 |
Echemus hamipalpis:
Dalmas, R. de 1919: 250 |
Leptodrassus hamipalpis:
Simon, E. 1893: 363 |
Melanophora hamipalpis
Kroneberg, A. 1875: 24 |