Shadinia terpoghassiani ( Shadin, 1952 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.208 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F807AC79-2615-463B-8272-82523B46210A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4773570 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987BF-FFB0-FFA2-FDF7-73D9FF01FCB4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Shadinia terpoghassiani ( Shadin, 1952 ) |
status |
|
Shadinia terpoghassiani ( Shadin, 1952)
Figs 8–9 View Fig. 8 View Fig. 9 ; Tables 2–3 View Table 2 View Table 3
Pyrgula terpoghassiani Shadin, 1952: 227 View in CoL
Pyrgula terpoghassiani View in CoL – Akramowski 1952, nom. nud.
New diagnosis
Shell ovate-conic, yellowish, with two weak parallel keels along the body whorl; pyriform aperture; protoconch microsculpture wrinkled; central radular tooth formula 3–C–3/(2)3–3(2); pyriform bursa copulatrix; SRI elongate with a short duct and SRII smaller, globular and without duct; penis gradually tapering and simple, with a distal end tapered and black pigmented; nervous system moderately concentrated (mean RPG ratio = 0.45) and with slight black pigmentation.
Material examined
Type material not specified.
Type locality
ARMENIA: Lake Aiger-Lich, south of Metzamor , Armavia province, 40° 08.573' N, 44°10.270' E, 18 May 2008.
GoogleMapsDescription
Shell ovate-conic with 4–4.5 whorls, height 2.6–3.6 mm ( Fig. 8 View Fig. 8 A–C, Table 2 View Table 2 ); periostracum yellowish; protoconch approximately 385 µm wide with 1.3 whorls and nucleus around 125 µm long; protoconch microsculpture wrinkled ( Fig. 8 View Fig. 8 D); body whorl about ⅔ total length and bearing two weak spiral keels; rest of whorls tall and convex with a deep suture; aperture complete, pyriform, with an inner lip thicker than outer lip; peristome margin slightly sinuate.
Operculum with 2.5 whorls approximately ( Fig. 8 View Fig. 8 E–F) and muscle attachment area oval and located near the nucleus.
Radula intermediate length (25% total shell length) bearing around 45 rows of teeth; central tooth formula 3–C–3/(2)3–3(2) ( Fig. 8 View Fig. 8 G–H); lateral teeth formula 3–C–3; inner and outer marginal teeth bearing 17–21 and 19–25 cusps, respectively ( Fig. 8 View Fig. 8 I).
Pigmentation and anatomy
Head dark brown pigmented from snout to penial base; pigmentation clearer on neck; tentacles also brown pigmented except on ocular lobes; snout as long as wide, with medial lobation. Ctenidium in middle region of pallial cavity with 18–20 gill filaments; osphradium two to three times longer than wide and opposite middle of ctenidium ( Fig. 9 View Fig. 9 A, Table 3 View Table 3 ).
Nervous system with black pigmentation and moderately concentrated (mean RPG ratio 0.45, Table 3 View Table 3 ); cerebral ganglia equal in size ( Fig. 9 View Fig. 9 B).
Female genitalia with a capsule gland longer than albumen gland ( Fig. 9 View Fig. 9 C, Table 3 View Table 3 ); pyriform bursa copulatrix lying against the middle section of the albumen gland; bursal duct longer than bursa length; renal oviduct straight and white from the insertion point of bursal duct to SRII; hereafter black pigmented making one or two loops; two opposite seminal receptacles; SRI pyriform with short duct and SRII smaller, black pigmented, globular and sessile ( Fig. 9 View Fig. 9 D).
Male genitalia bearing a penis simple, gradually tapering, with a distal end tapered, and black pigmented on the distal section ( Fig. 9 View Fig. 9 E–F); bean-shaped prostate gland about two times longer than wide ( Fig. 9 View Fig. 9 G, Table 3 View Table 3 ).
Remarks
Specimens from the type locality varied in shell dimensions and whorl convexity ( Fig. 8 View Fig. 8 A–C and Shadin 1952: fig. 51), though they were similar in their anatomical features. So far, Shadinia is the only pyrgulinid genus bearing two seminal receptacles (for a morphological review of the Pyrgulinae subfamily see Radoman (1983); the anatomy of Pyrgula Cristofori & Jan, 1832 and Dianella Gude, 1913 is described in Szarowska 2006). Size of seminal receptacles varies slightly between the three anatomically known species, being smaller in S. terpoghassiani than in S. bjniensis . Moreover, some specimens of S. terpoghassiani are larger (shell height S. bjniensis 3.6–4.0 mm, S. terpoghassiani 5.2 mm, see Shadin 1952) and often two weak spiral keels are present in the shell body whorl. Three basal cusps in the central radular tooth are also present in S. akramowskii ( Shadin 1952) . The species of Shadinia here analyzed differ from each other by 0.4% COI p-distances ( Table 4 View Table 4 ).
Ecology and distribution
Armenia and Nakhchivan province of Azerbaijan (Akramowski 1976).
EuropeanJournalofTaxonomy
208
:
1
–
29
(
2016
)
24
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Pseudamnicola lucensis | - | |||||||||||||||||||
2. Corrosella falkneri | 13.7 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
3. Diegus gasulli | 12.9 | 11.2 | - | |||||||||||||||||
4. Intermaria zagrosensis | 15.2 | 13.7 | 10.8 | - | ||||||||||||||||
5. Persipyrgula saboori | 14.3 | 12.6 | 10.6 | 6.7 | - | |||||||||||||||
6. Intermaria kermanshahensis | 15.1 | 13.5 | 10.6 | 0.1 | 6.5 | - | ||||||||||||||
7. Shadinia bjniensis | 15.6 | 14.1 | 11.7 | 3.5 | 8.3 | 3.6 | - | |||||||||||||
8. Shadinia terpoghassiani | 15.9 | 14.5 | 12.5 | 3.7 | 8.5 | 3.9 | 0.4 | - | ||||||||||||
9. Pyrgula annulata | 16.8 | 17.8 | 14.6 | 12.2 | 12.5 | 12.4 | 11.6 | 11.8 | - | |||||||||||
10. Chilopyrgula sturanyi | 17.2 | 17.1 | 14.6 | 13.2 | 12.8 | 13.3 | 12.4 | 12.6 | 1.9 | - | ||||||||||
11. Ohridopyrgula macedónica | 16.9 | 16.5 | 13.8 | 12.2 | 12.9 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 11.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 | - | |||||||||
12. Xestopyrgula dybowskii | 17.4 | 16.9 | 14.3 | 13.2 | 13.0 | 13.3 | 12.2 | 12.4 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 4.1 | - | ||||||||
13. Dianella thiesseana | 16.9 | 16.8 | 13.4 | 12.1 | 13.1 | 12.2 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.5 | - | |||||||
14. Euxinipyrgula milachevitchi | 18.5 | 18.2 | 13.7 | 14.1 | 13.8 | 14.3 | 14.0 | 14.2 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 10.8 | 11.4 | - | ||||||
15. Micromelania lincta | 18.3 | 18.4 | 14.1 | 14.4 | 13.9 | 14.6 | 14.0 | 14.2 | 11.6 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.3 | 11.9 | 0.6 | - | |||||
16. Turricaspia sp. | 18.9 | 18.5 | 14.0 | 14.3 | 14.1 | 14.4 | 13.8 | 14.0 | 11.4 | 11.6 | 11.9 | 11.1 | 11.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | - | ||||
17. Falsipyrgula pfeiferi | 18.7 | 18.2 | 13.5 | 14.1 | 13.8 | 14.3 | 14.0 | 14.2 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 11.4 | 11.0 | 11.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | - | |||
18. Ginaia munda munda | 17.6 | 16.4 | 12.9 | 11.3 | 11.9 | 11.4 | 10.9 | 11.1 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 4.5 | 10.7 | 11.1 | 11.0 | 10.5 | - | ||
19. Ginaia munda sublitoralis | 17.8 | 16.1 | 13.5 | 11.9 | 12.3 | 12.1 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 5.0 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 10.7 | 10.2 | 2.6 | - | |
20. Macedopyrgula pavlovici | 16.3 | 16.0 | 13.2 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 10.3 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 10.1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | - |
21. Macedopyrgula wagneri | 16.9 | 16.7 | 13.5 | 12.4 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 10.5 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 10.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.3 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Shadinia terpoghassiani ( Shadin, 1952 )
Diana Delicado, ladimir Pešić & Peter Glöer 2016 |
Pyrgula terpoghassiani
Shadin V. I. 1952: 227 |