Nothria lizae, Paxton & Budaeva & Gunton, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.2201-4349.75.2023.1802 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10988797 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C99027-FF9D-A60C-EAAF-FF21FD1AFDD2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Nothria lizae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nothria lizae View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:189B36FF-006D-426D-8E85-50540F80784A
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 15–17 View Figure 15 View Figure 16 View Figure 17 , Tables 2 View Table 2 , S 1 View Table 1
Holotype. Australian Museum ( AM) W. 49032, IN2015 _ E02_22; 11 Apr 2015; Australia, Tasmania, Huon Marine Park , 44.32°S 147.32– 147.31°E; 2010 m depth GoogleMaps . Paratypes (8): AM W.49034, IN2015 _E02_21 (1). AM W.49035, IN2015 _E02_21 (1). AM W.51446, IN2015 _ E02_22 (1 SEM on pin). SAMA E8971 About SAMA , IN2015 _C01_69 (1). AM W.51566, IN2018 _ V06 _74 (1). AM W.51632, IN2018 _ V06 _169 (1). AM W.51633, IN2018 _ V06 _169 (1). AM W.51634, IN2018 _ V06 _169 (1).
Other material examined (102). AM W.53854, IN 2015_ E0_21 (2). AM W.53855, IN 2015_E0_22 (1). AM W.53853, IN 2015_E0_22 (2). AM W.51565, IN 2018_VO6_037 (1). AM W.53856, IN 2018_ V 06_ 169 (2). AM W.53857, IN 2018_ V 06_169 (94).
Diagnosis. Eyes absent; antennae extending to chaetiger 9–18; short branchiae from chaetiger 12–14 onwards on some or all chaetigers; first 3 chaetigers with anterior hooks: robust, bidentate simple and slender pseudocompound hooks on chaetiger 1; slender bidentate simple and pseudocompound hooks on chaetiger 2; bidentate pseudocompound to compound hooks on chaetiger 3; pectinate and limbate chaetae from chaetiger 3; subacicular hooks from chaetiger 10–13.
Description. Holotype almost complete, measuring 20 mm for 42 chaetigers, width 2.8 mm; 3 complete paratypes (16–30 mm long for 48–57 chaetigers, width 2.6–4.0 mm); 5 incomplete paratypes (7–19 mm long for 15–39 chaetigers, width 2.2–3.0 mm). Non-type material ranging from 1.9–3.0 mm in width. Alcohol-stored specimens overall whitish to cream coloured with brown splotches on head structures, parapodia and dorsum. Prostomium anteriorly rounded, wider than long with 2 ovate frontal lips close together in holotype and most specimens but separated in some by small space. Palpo- and antennophores with 2–3 proximal rings and a slightly longer distal ring ( Fig. 15A,B View Figure 15 ). Palpostyles tapering, extending to chaetiger 1, lateral antennostyles to chaetiger 10 (9–14), median antennostyle to 12 (11–18); antennostyles tapering gradually, ending in blunt tips. Nuchal grooves straight, with small middorsal separation. Eyes absent. Ventral upper lip rounded to oval, lower lip subtriangular, neither with median section. Peristomium short, peristomial cirri inserted subdistally on peristomium, about twice as long as peristomium ( Fig. 15A View Figure 15 ).
First chaetiger enlarged, slightly more than twice as long as peristomium, chaetiger 2 about half as long as chaetiger 1, chaetiger 3 similar in length to following ones. Anterior 3 pairs of parapodia modified; first pair greatly enlarged, directed forward, extending far beyond anterior margin of prostomium with large auricular prechaetal lobes, subulate postchaetal lobes, digitate dorsal and subulate ventral cirri ( Fig. 15A,B View Figure 15 ). Prechaetal lobes of holotype and most paratypes with small lip-like extension between two large hooks ( Fig. 15C View Figure 15 ). Second pair of parapodia similar to first but smaller, with smaller prechaetal lobes. Third pair only slightly larger than subsequent parapodia, with further reduced, tongue-like prechaetal lobes; ventral cirri ovate, transitioning to glandular pads ( Fig. 15A,B View Figure 15 ). From chaetiger 4 onwards parapodial structures becoming more uniform; dorsal cirri gradually becoming thinner and shorter, prechaetal lobes becoming short and rounded, postchaetal lobes gradually decreasing in length, last one on chaetiger 14 (13–15), ventral cirri replaced by oval glandular pads. Branchiae present as short, filaments; in holotype tiny branchia from chaetiger 12, increasing slightly to chaetiger 30 where it is equal in length to greatly reduced dorsal cirrus, then decreasing in size but present until end of fragment. In paratypes branchial filament starting from chaetiger 12–14 ( Fig. 15D View Figure 15 ), sometimes only for a few segments, thereafter absent or later reappearing again to near end of body.
First pair of parapodia with 2 almost robust (shaft <30 µm wide) ( Fig. 15E View Figure 15 ) to robust bidentate simple ( Fig. 16A View Figure 16 ) and 1 slender bidentate pseudocompound hooded hook ( Fig. 16B View Figure 16 ). Second pair of parapodia with slender, bidentate simple ( Fig. 16C View Figure 16 ) and pseudocompound hooks ( Fig. 16D View Figure 16 ). Third pair of parapodia with 3–4 very slender pseudocompound to compound bidentate hooks with serrated upper shaft and appendages ( Fig. 16E View Figure 16 ), as well as 2–3 limbate chaetae and numerous (about 30) scoop-shaped pectinate chaetae with about 20–22 teeth. Anterior hooks absent from chaetiger 4, limbate and pectinate chaetae present in reduced numbers to end of body. Subacicular hooks present singly from chaetiger 12 (10–13) and as pairs from chaetiger 14 (12–15). Pygidium with 2 long anal cirri.
Mandibles ( Fig. 16F View Figure 16 ) highly calcified, almost white, except for darkly sclerotized protomandibles; shafts long and slender, cutting plates high with weakly defined lower teeth and large distal tooth. Maxillae ( Fig. 16G View Figure 16 ) overall light brown with darker sclerotized teeth and attachment lamellae; maxillary formula: MI = 1+1; MII = 7–10 + 9–10 (left most distal tooth fang-like), MIII = 7–8 + 0; MIV = 1+1 (based on 5 specimens). Ratio of mandibles/maxillae = 1.2. Flattened tube ( Fig. 17A View Figure 17 ), covered mainly with evenly sized shell fragments dorsally and ventrally giving the appearance of a pavement, sides filled in with foraminiferans; lining transparent .
Remarks. Nothria lizae sp. nov. and N. josae sp. nov. (described directly above) are two sister species that are similar morphologically ( Table 2 View Table 2 ). They both have short branchiae from about chaetiger 12–13, a similar distribution of bidentate simple and pseudocompound hooks on chaetigers 1–3, pectinate chaetae from chaetiger 3 and subacicular hooks from about chaetiger 12. However, they can be distinguished in that N. josae sp. nov. is a smaller species (maximum width to 2 mm), has a subtriangular prostomium, large posterior eyes, shorter antennae (median to chaetiger 9–11), tube with oversized shells, and was collected at a depth of about 1000 m, while N. lizae sp. nov. has a rounded prostomium, lacks eyes, has longer antennae (median to chaetiger 11–18), tube with evenly sized shell fragments and occurs at about 1500–2000 m depth.
Etymology. Nothria lizae sp. nov. is named for Liza Paxton, granddaughter of the first author.
Distribution. The new species has been collected south of Tasmania in the flat area south of Brians, in 1443– 1422 m, the Huon Marine Park in 2010–2028 m and in the Great Australian Bight in 1569.6–1636 m ( Fig. 17B View Figure 17 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.