Baltodascillus serraticornis, Kundrata & Gimmel & Packova & Bukejs & Blank, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5194/fr-24-141-2021 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F55CA75B-AF7C-4F1F-BD65-DCBEAAC75410 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1839A0BD-37DB-4F9A-ABB9-12C8300682E1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:1839A0BD-37DB-4F9A-ABB9-12C8300682E1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Baltodascillus serraticornis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Baltodascillus serraticornis sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1839A0BD-37DB-4F9A-ABB9-12C8300682E1 ; Figs. 1–4 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 , Video supplements 1–4.
Type material
Holotype, adult male, NM-T 3470 ( NMPC, ex coll. R. Kundrata, Olomouc, No. BAL0012, ex coll. J. Damzen, Lithuania, No. 8751). A complete beetle is included in an elongate, transparent, yellow amber piece with dimensions of 32 × 15 × 4 mm, weighing approximately 1.7 g, without any syninclusions.
Type stratum and age
Mid-late Eocene, 48–34 Ma ( Seyfullah et al., 2018; Bukejs et al., 2019; Kasiński et al., 2020; Sadowski et al., 2017, 2020).
Type locality
Baltic Sea coast, Yantarny mine, Sambian (Samland) Peninsula, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia.
Etymology
The specific epithet “ serraticornis ” is a Latin adjective referring to the shape of the antennae.
Diagnosis
As for the genus (vide supra).
Description
Adult male. Body ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ) about 7.5 mm long and 2.5 mm wide, narrowly elongate, about 3 times as long as wide, weakly convex; dorsally moderately densely setose.
Head ( Figs. 2a, c, d View Figure 2 ; 3 View Figure 3 ; 4a, b View Figure 4 ) 1.5 mm wide, subquadrate, 0.8 times as wide as pronotum width. Eyes large, strongly protuberant. Frontoclypeal suture distinctly impressed, more or less straight; clypeus short and strongly transverse. Labrum wider than long, distinctly sclerotized, anteriorly slightly concave, with discal setae longer than length of exposed portion of labrum. Antenna ( Figs. 1–3 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 ) serrate, almost reaching middle of elytra; scape slightly longer than pedicel; pedicel slightly longer than wide; antennomeres 3–10 elongate, with prominent, acute serrations; terminal antennomere simple, slightly curved, elongate, about 1.4 times as long as antennomere X, apically rounded. Mandible ( Figs. 2a View Figure 2 , 3d View Figure 3 ) considerably reduced, very short, subtriangular, without teeth, apically narrowly rounded. Maxillary palpus ( Figs. 2c, d View Figure 2 ; 3 View Figure 3 ; 4a, b View Figure 4 ) moderately long; penultimate palpomere elongate, shorter than preceding one, about twice as long as wide; terminal palpomere fusiform, slightly longer than penultimate palpomere, about 2.5 times as long as wide, apically flattened and narrowly rounded. Labial palpus distinctly shorter than maxillary palpus, with terminal palpomere fusiform.
Pronotum ( Figs. 2b, c View Figure 2 ; 3a, d View Figure 3 ) transverse, about 1.7 times wider than long (1.9 mm wide, 1.1 mm long), widest just anterior to posterior angles; sides weakly arcuate; lateral carinae distinct, complete, slightly explanate; anterior angles obtuse, not projecting, posterior angles weakly acute; posterior edge tri-emarginate and weakly crenulate along entire length; disk slightly convex, with rather smooth surface. Hypomeron with postcoxal process obtuse. Prosternum ( Figs. 3b View Figure 3 ; 4b, c View Figure 4 ) in front of coxa about as long as procoxal diameter; prosternal process not developed, forming short right-angled denticle. Pronotosternal suture complete. Scutellar shield ( Figs. 1a View Figure 1 ; 2b View Figure 2 ; 3a View Figure 3 ) slightly longer than wide, weakly rounded anteriorly, narrowly rounded posteriorly. Elytra ( Figs. 1a View Figure 1 ; 2a, b View Figure 2 ) together about 2.4 times as long as wide (5.9 mm long, 2.5 mm wide) and 5.0 times as long as pronotum; weakly convex, more or less straight, widest at apical third, then gradually narrowed basal half. Tergite X triangular, apically narrowly rounded. Aedeagus with only parameres visible but not median lobes.
Remark
We conclude that the examined specimen is a male based on the shape of the body, serrate antennae, a long, narrowly rounded abdominal ventrite 5, and aedeagal structure (parameres) detected in X-ray micro-CT imaging.
towards apex; elytral surface without costae or striae; elytral punctures irregular, only partially in weakly defined rows; elytral intervals flat; elytral epipleuron narrow and oblique behind humeral area. Mesoventrite ( Figs. 3b View Figure 3 ; 4b, c View Figure 4 ) with anterior edge medially on the same plane as metaventrite, forming short triangular projection laterally bordered by procoxal rests. Mesocoxal cavities separated by narrow mesoventral process. Metaventrite wider than long, moderately convex. Metacoxae contiguous, extending laterally to level of elytral epipleuron; metacoxal plate well developed mesally. Hind wing fully developed. Leg ( Figs. 1b View Figure 1 ; 2d View Figure 2 ; 4a, b View Figure 4 ) slender, femur robust, elongate; tibia about as long as femur in fore- and midlegs, and slightly longer than femur in hind legs; each tibia with pair of distinctly serrate spurs approximately equal in length. Tarsomere 1 distinctly longer than tarsomere 2, tarsomeres 2–4 gradually shorter towards apex, each of tarsomeres 1–4 with membranous ventral lobe; lobes gradually larger from tarsomere 1 to tarsomere 4, those on tarsomeres 2–4 strongly bilobed ( Figs. 2e, f View Figure 2 ; 4f, g View Figure 4 ); claws simple, moderately curved; empodium absent.
Abdomen ( Figs. 1b View Figure 1 ; 4d, e View Figure 4 ) with five ventrites, with surface moderately densely covered by fine punctures; ventrites 1–4 gradually shorter towards apex; ventrite 1 without delimited hind coxal cavities, and with intercoxal process indistinct; ventrite 5 slightly longer than 4, triangular, narrowly rounded apically, apical half of ventrite in slightly different plane from
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.