Fernandezina, Biraben, 1951
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5415.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:92E05C65-4922-4999-AEA9-32D43694D772 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10692846 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA87F8-FA4C-D06C-FF68-A825EBA5FA97 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Fernandezina |
status |
|
Key to species of Fernandezina View in CoL View at ENA
1 Males .............................................................................................. 2
- Females............................................................................................ 18
2(1) Embolus with well-developed basal ledge ( Platnick et al. 1999, figs. 20–21)...................................... 3
- Embolus without well-developed basal ledge ( Ott & Ott 2014, figs 4–5) or without basal ledge ( Figs 5b, e View FIGURE 5 ).............. 5
3(2) Basal ledge of the embolus with rounded apex in ventral view ( Platnick et al. 1999, fig. 20); proportionally smaller palpal bulb and longer, more sinuous embolus.............................................................. F. maldonado View in CoL
- Basal ledge of the embolus with square apex in ventral view ( Platnick 1975, fig. 86; Platnick et al. 1999, fig. 32); proportionally larger palpal bulb and shorter, less sinuous embolus.......................................................... 4
4(3) Prolaterally widening of the embolus with pointed tip ( Platnick 1975, fig. 86)................................ F. pelta View in CoL
- Prolaterally widening of the embolus with rounded border ( Platnick et al. 1999, fig. 32)..................... F. pulchra View in CoL
5(4) Embolus as long as the cymbium ( Martínez & Gutierrez 2021, fig. 1e) or longer than the cymbium ( Cala-Riquelme et al. 2018, figs 26–27, 31–32).................................................................................... 6
- Embolus shorter than the cymbium ( Figs 5b, e View FIGURE 5 ).............................................................. 9
6(5) Palpal bulb without a proximal constriction ( Cala-Riquelme et al. 2018, figs 26–27)....................... F. andersoni View in CoL
- Palpal bulb with conspicuous proximal constriction ( Cala-Riquelme et al. 2018; Platnick et al. 1999)................... 7
7(6) Embolus with conspicuous prolateral, subdistal ledge and bifid apex ( Martínez & Gutierrez 2021, fig. 1e)..... F. grismadoi View in CoL
- Embolus without any subdistal ledge and bifid apex.......................................................... 8
8(7) Embolus proportionally very long and curved (almost 2x the cymbium length) and very long, narrow neck of the palpal bulb, almost as long as the cymbium ( Cala-Riquelme et al. 2018, figs 31–33)................................. F. eduardoi View in CoL
- Embolus proportionally long and curved (almost 1.5x the cymbum length) and short neck of the palpal bulb ( Platnick et al. 1999, figs 22–24)............................................................................... F. ilheus View in CoL
9(5) Embolus with subdistal retrolateral laminar extension ( Ott & Ott 2014, figs 4–5).................................. 10
- Embolus without subdistal retrolateral laminar extension ( Figs 5a, d View FIGURE 5 )........................................... 11
10(9) Embolus with inconspicuous basal ledge and semicircular retrolateral laminar extension ( Ott & Ott 2014, figs 4–5).. F. nica View in CoL
- Embolus without basal ledge and irregular retrolateral laminar extension ( Castro et al. 2015, fig. 6c)......... F. jurubatiba View in CoL
11(9) Embolus straight ( Platnick et al. 1999, figs 29–31) or almost straight ( Ramírez & Grismado 1996, fig. 1)............... 12
- Embolus conspicuously curved ( Figs 5a–b, d–e View FIGURE 5 )............................................................ 15
12(11) Embolus with conspicuous neck at the tip ( Buckup & Ott 2004, fig. 7; Ramírez & Grismado 1996, fig. 1).............. 13
- Embolus uniformly straight, without apical neck ( Platnick 1975, figs 90–91)..................................... 14
13(12) Embolus inserted in the distal half of the palpal bulb ( Castro et al. 2015, fig. 8b–c; Ramírez & Grismado 1996, fig. 1)... F. tijuca View in CoL
- Embolus inserted in the proximal half of the palpal bulb ( Buckup & Ott 2004, fig. 7)........................... F. saira View in CoL
14(12) Embolus with a folded lateral ridge ( Platnick 1975, figs 90–91)........................................... F. acuta View in CoL
- Embolus straight, without lateral ridges............................................................. F. dasilvai View in CoL
15(11) Embolus inserted in the distal half of the palpal bulb ( Castro et al. 2015, fig. 8b–c; Ramírez & Grismado 1996, fig. 1).... 16
- Embolus inserted in the proximal half of the palpal bulb ( Buckup & Ott 2004, fig. 7)............................... 17
16(15) Embolus with a bifid apex ( Platnick 1975, fig. 92)..................................................... F. divisa View in CoL
- Embolus without bifid apex ( Figs 5d–e View FIGURE 5 )..................................................... F. angeloi sp. nov.
17(15) Embolus with a retrolateral insertion ( Figs 5a–b View FIGURE 5 )............................................ F. fernandoi sp. nov.
- Embolus with ventral insertion ( Grismado 2002, fig. 3)................................................. F. takutu View in CoL
18(1) Female internal genitalia with short receptacles ( Cala-Riquelme et al. 2018, fig. 34; Platnick 1975, fig. 20)............. 19
- Female internal genitalia with very developed and globose receptacles ( Fig. 5c View FIGURE 5 )................................... 20
19(18) Receptacles thin and curved at the tip, wider at the base ( Cala-Riquelme et al. 2018, fig. 34)................. F. eduardoi View in CoL
- Receptacles small and rounded ( Platnick 1975, fig. 20)................................................. F. acuta View in CoL
20(18) Receptacles apart from the pore plates, anteriorly positioned ( Fig. 5c View FIGURE 5 )........................................... 21
- Receptacles positioned dorsally to the pore plates ( Platnick et al. 1999, fig. 27)................................... 22
21(20) Pore plates with two rounded branches, directed anteriorly ( Cala-Riquelme et al. 2018, fig. 28).............. F. andersoni View in CoL
- Pore plates with two thin branches, directed posteriorly ( Fig. 5c View FIGURE 5 )................................ F. fernandoi sp. nov.
22(20) Receptacles ovoid or semicircular, without constrictions ( Platnick 1975, fig. 89).................................. 23
- Receptacles with constrictions ( Castro et al. 2015, fig. 8a).................................................... 25
23(22) Receptacles superimposed medially ( Castro et al. 2015, fig. 6a)...................................... F. jurubatiba View in CoL
- Receptacles separated medially ( Platnick 1975, fig. 89)...................................................... 24
24(23) Receptacles with pointed posterior border ( Platnick 1975, fig. 89).......................................... F. pelta View in CoL
- Receptacles with rounded posterior border......................................................... F. dasilvai View in CoL
25(22) Pore plates widely separated from each other ( Ott & Ott 2014, fig. 13)...................................... F. nica View in CoL
- Pore plates very close to each other, medially ( Castro et al. 2015, fig. 8a)........................................ 26
26(25) Receptacles with anterior half wider than the posterior half ( Castro et al. 2015, fig. 8a)......................... F. tijuca View in CoL
- Receptacles with posterior half wider than the anterior half ( Piacentini et al. 2013, fig. 6b).................... F. pulchra View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |