Culicoides reticulatus Lutz
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3795.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A90C789-0A57-4905-9253-F00DD530E340 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5696601 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CB1921-FF8B-A045-3EB3-FA8A9F77FBF4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Culicoides reticulatus Lutz |
status |
|
Culicoides reticulatus Lutz View in CoL , redescription
Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 A–K; Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9
Culicoides reticulatus Lutz, 1913: 49 View in CoL (female; Brazil - Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Bahia; fig. wing, male, larva; bionomy, larva in crab holes in mangrove edge; in part material from Bahia); Rieth, 1915: 417 (bionomics data, based on Lutz 1913); Costa Lima, 1937: 413 (key); Barbosa, 1943: 261 (male, female; Brazil - Pernambuco; figs. wing, palpus, male terminalia); Vargas, 1945: 43 (in list); Barbosa, 1947: 5, 25 (key, distrib.); Macfie, 1948: 73 (key); Vargas, 1949: 205 (in list); Ortiz, 1950: 464 (distrib.); Iriarte, 1950: 398 (in list); Fox, 1955: 254 (in list); Forattini, 1957: 432 (in neotropical catalog; figs.; in part specimens from Bahia and Pernambuco); Spinelli & Wirth, 1986: 56 (key, fig. wing); Wirth et al., 1988: 42 (in Atlas; fig. wing; distrib.; in part material from Brazil, not Pará); Borkent & Wirth, 1997: 80 (in catalog); Borkent & Spinelli, 2000: 41 (in catalog; distrib.; in part material from Bahia and Pernambuco); Borkent & Spinelli, 2007: 74 (in catalog; distrib. in part material from Bahia and Pernambuco); Borkent, 2014: 99 (in catalog).
Diagnosis. Female: This species is distinguished by the following combination of characters: large sized species; eyes separated by diameter of ½ ommatidium; palpus with shallow, rounded sensory pit in middle portion; PR 2.6–3.0 (n=6); proboscis long. Male: parameres stem, slightly sinuous in median portion, without ventral lobe; basal arch of aedeagus extending ½ of total length.
Female. Head. Brown. Eyes bare ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 C), separated by a distance equal to a diameter of ½ ommatidium. Pedicel brown, flagellum ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 D) pale brown; AR 1.0–1.4 (1.02, n=5); sensilla coeloconica on flagellomeres 1,6–8. Palpus ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 F) brown; 3rd segment fusiform, slightly swollen in middle length, with a shallow, rounded sensory pit in middle portion; PR 2.6–3.0 (2.8, n=6). Proboscis long; P/H ratio 1.14–1.17 (1.16, n=4); mandible with 23–25 (n=4) teeth.
Thorax. Dark brown. Scutum without distinct pattern in slide mounted specimens. Wing ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 A) with contrasting pattern: second radial cell including dark spot; pale spot over R-M extending from M1 to costal margin, subdivided; r3 with four small and separated pale spots: first, rounded, between the second radial cell and M1; second, poststigmatic extending behind second radial cell, abutting wing margin; third, in the middle of cell, rounded, smaller than second one; fourth, distal pale spot slightly reaching wing margin; m1 with two pale spots, the distal one far from wing margin and greater than the proximal one; m2 with four pale spots: one proximal, near CuA, two between the medial and mediocubital forks and a distal one not reaching the wing margin; cua1 with a rounded pale spot in the middle of cell; anal cell with a faint basal pale area and one distal pale spot near mediocubital fork; wing base with a faint pale spot on M; M1, M2 and CuA1 with pale apices; macrotrichia scarcely distributed on distal half of wing; wing length 1.30 (n=4) mm; breadth 0.57–0.59 (0.55, n=4) mm; CR 0.64 (n=4). Halter knob brown, stem pale. Legs ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 G) mostly brown; femora with subapical pale bands, tibiae with subbasal pale bands; hind tibia pale apically; hind tibial comb with four spines, the one nearest the spur longest.
Abdomen. Brown. Two subequal ovoid spermathecae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 E), measuring 46.4 µm (n=5) by 32.8 µm (n=4) and 43.5 µm (n=4) by 31 µm (n=2). Rudimentary third spermatheca present.
Male. Similar to female with usual sexual differences. AR 0.93 (n=1). Palpus ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 H) with 3rd segment short, two round sensory pits; PR1.6 (n=1). Wing length 1.03 (n=1) mm, breadth 0.43 (n=1) mm, CR 0.63 (n=1), pattern of pale spots as in figure 1B. Terminalia ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 I): tergite 9 not observable in slide mounted specimen; sternite 9 straight on distal margin; gonocoxite 2x longer than greatest breadth, ventral and dorsal root slender, elongated; gonostylus tapering distally, distal portion slightly curved. Parameres ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 K) separated, each with a sclerotized basal knob; stem long, curved near base and slightly sinuous in median portion, without ventral lobe; apical portion tapered, abruptly bent, without lateral fringe of spicules. Aedeagus ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 J) Y-shaped, lateral arms strongly sclerotized, basal arch triangular extending ½ of total length; distal portion slender, tapering to blunt tip without median or distal processes.
Specimens examined. Type series, 1 male, 7 females on one microscope slide, labeled " Culicoides reticulatus Lutz, 1913 , Bahia, A. Lutz prep." (CCER n.2983- Costa Lima collection).
Distribution and bionomics. Culicoides reticulatus is now restricted to Brazilian states of Bahia and Pernambuco ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). It is associated to mangrove areas from these states and cited by Lutz (1913) biting human, horses and cow in the vicinity of these areas.
Discussion. Forattini et al (1960) captured larva and pupa of Culicoides in mangrove areas and described them as C. reticulatus without correlation with adult stage. Due to incertitude if this description is related to C. reticulatus Lutz , we don't consider it herein.
In this study, all material identified as C. reticulatus from the Amazon region (Amazonas, Pará and Roraima States) present important differences from C. reticulatus Lutz and, constitutes five new species as described below. Then, we think that the bionomic data cited by Veras & Castellón (1998) for C. reticulatus from Amazonas State, as well as the records published by Wirth & Blanton (1973) and Castellón et al (1993) for this species in Amazonas and Para states, cannot be considered due to the misidentification of these species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Culicoides reticulatus Lutz
Santarém, Maria Clara Alves, Trindade, Rosimeire Lopes Da, Silva, Tiago Do Nascimento Da, Castellón, Eloy Guillermo, Patiu, Cátia Antunes De Mello & Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza 2014 |
Culicoides reticulatus
Borkent 2014: 99 |
Borkent 2007: 74 |
Borkent 2000: 41 |
Borkent 1997: 80 |
Wirth 1988: 42 |
Spinelli 1986: 56 |
Forattini 1957: 432 |
Fox 1955: 254 |
Ortiz 1950: 464 |
Iriarte 1950: 398 |
Vargas 1949: 205 |
Macfie 1948: 73 |
Barbosa 1947: 5 |
Vargas 1945: 43 |
Barbosa 1943: 261 |
Costa 1937: 413 |
Rieth 1915: 417 |
Lutz 1913: 49 |