Bothropolys rugosus ( Meinert, 1872 )

Ma, Huiqin, Pei, Sujian, Hou, Xiaojie, Zhu, Tiegang, Wu, Dayong & Gai, Yonghua, 2014, An annotated checklist of Lithobiomorpha of China, Zootaxa 3847 (3), pp. 333-358 : 353-354

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3847.3.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D0095F72-699E-4315-888C-0252AF873ECE

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514078

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CB87B1-FFF0-1D62-FF48-F82DFAB60DD4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Bothropolys rugosus ( Meinert, 1872 )
status

 

Bothropolys rugosus ( Meinert, 1872) View in CoL

Lithobius rugosus Meinert, 1872: 306

Bothropolys asperatus L. Koch, 1878: 788 View in CoL

Lithobius thetidis Karsch, 1880: 848 View in CoL

Bothropolys shimensis Pocock, 1895: 349 View in CoL

Bothropolys spinosior Chamberlin, 1920: 78 View in CoL

Bothropolys migrans Chamberlin, 1930: 69 View in CoL

Bothropolys asperatus View in CoL — Takakuwa, 1941b: 35, fig 23 Bothropolys asperatus asperatus View in CoL — Takakuwa & Takashima, 1949: 58 Bothropolys asperatus View in CoL — Chamberlin & Wang, 1952: 184 Bothropolys asperatus View in CoL — Wang, 1956: 159

Bothropolys asperatus View in CoL — Chen & Ye, 1959: 95, figs 1 1 – 5 Bothropolys asperatus View in CoL — Wang, 1963: 95

Bothropolys rugosus View in CoL — Eason, 1974: 20, fig 6

Bothropolys rugosus View in CoL — Wang & Mauriès, 1996: 91 Bothropolys asperatus View in CoL — Chao, 2005: 39

Bothropolys rugosus View in CoL — Zapparoli, 2006

Bothropolys rugosus View in CoL — Stagl & Zapparoli, 2006: 4 Bothropolys rugosus View in CoL — Ma, Song & Zhu, 2008a: 43 View Cited Treatment Bothropolys rugosus View in CoL — Chao, 2010: 339

Previous records. Anhui Province (Huangshan City), Hebei Province (Baoding, Hengshui and Zhangjiakou Cities), Henan Province (Anyang, Nanyang, Xinyang and Zhumadian Cities), Hunan Province (Changsha, Dayong and Zhangjiajie Cities), Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Baise, Chongzuo, Guilin, Nanning and Pingxiang Cities), Guizhou Province (Zunyi City), Shaanxi Province (Hanzhong and Huayin Cities), Sichuan Province (Guangyuan City), Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Hami City) ( Chen & Ye, 1959; Ma et al., 2008a); Shanxi Province (Xinzhou and Yuncheng Cities), ( Takakuwa & Takashima, 1949); Zhejiang Province (Shengsi City) ( Chamberlin & Wang, 1952); Taiwan (Hualien) ( Wang, 1956); Taiwan (Ta Ping Shan) ( Wang, 1963).

Remarks. Eason (1974) established that asperatus , thetidis , shimensis , spinosior and migrans are synonyms of Bothropolys rugosus . Also known from Uzbekistan, Kirghizstan, Japan, North Korea, the Philippines, New Guinea, the Hawaiian Islands( Ma, Song & Zhu, 2008a). This species is not only naturally widespread in China, but also widespread in eastern Asia. However, it was also found in the Hawaiian Islands, Eason (1974, 1977) suggested that B. rugosus had been introduced in the Hawaiian Islands from either Japan or the mainland of eastern Asia.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Chilopoda

Order

Lithobiomorpha

Family

Lithobiidae

Genus

Bothropolys

Loc

Bothropolys rugosus ( Meinert, 1872 )

Ma, Huiqin, Pei, Sujian, Hou, Xiaojie, Zhu, Tiegang, Wu, Dayong & Gai, Yonghua 2014
2014
Loc

Bothropolys rugosus

Chao 2010: 339
Ma 2008: 43
Stagl 2006: 4
2006
Loc

Bothropolys rugosus

Chao 2005: 39
Wang 1996: 91
1996
Loc

Bothropolys rugosus

Eason 1974: 20
1974
Loc

Bothropolys asperatus

Wang 1963: 95
Chen 1959: 95
1959
Loc

Bothropolys asperatus

Wang 1956: 159
Chamberlin 1952: 184
Takakuwa 1949: 58
Takakuwa 1941: 35
1941
Loc

Bothropolys migrans

Chamberlin 1930: 69
1930
Loc

Bothropolys spinosior

Chamberlin 1920: 78
1920
Loc

Bothropolys shimensis

Pocock 1895: 349
1895
Loc

Lithobius thetidis

Karsch 1880: 848
1880
Loc

Bothropolys asperatus

Koch 1878: 788
1878
Loc

Lithobius rugosus

Meinert 1872: 306
1872
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF