Dayipsammolyce paulayi, Cruz-Gómez, 2022

Cruz-Gómez, Christopher, 2022, Pelogeniinae Chamberlin, 1919 (Annelida, Sigalionidae) from the Grand Caribbean Region, European Journal of Taxonomy 807, pp. 1-59 : 9-13

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.807.1717

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:67DAF0D7-9D9F-4F0F-8004-9CCE0071BF33

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6421747

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CB87CF-C657-FFA3-B814-FA5FB3C4FB5F

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Dayipsammolyce paulayi
status

sp. nov.

Dayipsammolyce paulayi View in CoL sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:3426B17A-F0F9-4624-B477-41C48EBFF05F

Figs 2A–B, E–F, M–N View Fig , 3–4 View Fig View Fig

Diagnosis

A species of Dayipsammolyce with second elytra pear-shaped with one median and one posterior process; neurochaetae from segment II with whorled handles and falcate blades.

Etymology

This species is named after Dr Gustav Paulay, echinoderm specialist and curator of marine invertebrates at the University of Florida Natural History Museum, Gainesville, in recognition of his support by kindly sharing many of the specimens used in this study. The epithet is a noun in the genitive case ( ICZN 1999, Art. 31.1.2).

Material examined

Holotype SAINT MARTIN • complete spec.; Chicot, windward side of Tintamarre Island; 18°06′7″ N, 62°58′58″ W; depth 13–19 m; 23 Apr. 2012; Mandy Bemis and Frank Roncuzzi leg.; reef in sand; UF 2777 . GoogleMaps

Paratype SAINT MARTIN • 1 complete spec., 74 segments, 1.7 cm long, 0.8 cm to segment 30, 0.3 cm wide; same locality as for holotype; depth 15–18 m; 12 Apr. 2012; Frank Roncuzzi leg.; reef in sand; UF 2618 GoogleMaps .

Description (holotype)

BODY. Pale yellow, long, broad ( Fig. 3A View Fig ); 104 segments, 2.8 cm long, 0.5 cm to segment 30, 0.1 cm wide. Middorsal line covered with foreign particles attached to adhesive papillae ( Fig. 3B View Fig ). Venter covered with short globular and long papillae ( Fig. 3C View Fig ).

PROSTOMIUM. Oval, wider than long. Two pairs of eyes, anterior eyes larger, inserted anteriorly. Lateral antennae small, slender; ceratophores longer than style, dorsally fused with tentacular segment. Median antenna with bulbous ceratophore with a dorsal ridge; basally with small ctenidia, ceratophore slightly larger than prostomium; style short, almost twice as long as ceratophore ( Fig. 3B View Fig ). Middorsal lobe of segment II absent. Facial tubercle large, bulbous, stalk reduced ( Fig. 3D View Fig ). First segment directed anteriorly, fused with tentacular segment; biramous, chaetae simple verticillate. Dorsal tentacular cirrus longer than neuropodia including chaetae, ventral tentacular cirrus as long as dorsal one; palps laterally displaced, short, reaching segment four, with inner palpal sheaths ( Fig. 3C View Fig ). Pharynx partially everted, margin papillate ( Fig. 3E View Fig ). Paratype with pharynx completely everted ( Fig. 3F View Fig ).

ELYTRA. First three right elytra missing. Second left elytron pear-shaped, with one median and one posterior process ( Fig. 4F View Fig ), covered with a few foreign particles and foraminifera, and several kinds of papillae: dendritic short papillae, pedunculate papillae with truncated tips, pedunculate papillae with flat tips, and flat papillae ( Figs 2E–F, M–N View Fig , 4H, K View Fig ); central region with a patch of long dendritic papillae; marginal papillae long dendritic, bifurcate ( Fig. 4I View Fig ). Third left elytron slightly longer than second, with same distribution and kinds of papillae as second elytron. Posterior right elytron round ( Fig. 4G View Fig ), with two posterior and one medial process, with same kinds of papillae, but less abundant, and with microtubercles ( Fig. 2A–B View Fig ).

RIGHT PARAPODIUM FROM SEGMENT II ( Fig. 3G View Fig ). Notopodia leaf-shaped, smooth (non-papillate), slightly shorter than neuropodia, notopodial flange fleshy. With up to 100 simple verticillate notochaetae, tips hooked, shortest ones slightly longer than notopodia, longest ones 3× as long ( Fig. 3H View Fig ). Neuropodia conical, smooth (non-papillate), slightly larger than notopodia. Neurochaetae only falcigers, blades falcate, bifid, subdistal tooth broken in most blades: unit A, eight falcigers with handles thick, whorled with fimbriae, blades short, 4–5× as long as wide ( Fig. 3I View Fig ); unit B, two falcigers with handles thick, whorled with fimbriae, blades short, 3× as long as wide ( Fig. 3J View Fig ); unit C and D undifferentiated, six falcigers with handles slender, whorled with fimbriae, blades long, 6–7 × as long as wide ( Fig. 3K View Fig ).

RIGHT PARAPODIUM FROM SEGMENT III ( Fig. 3L View Fig ). Notopodia oval, smooth (non-papillate), short, half as long as neuropodia, notopodial flange fleshy. With up to 100 simple verticillate notochaetae, tips hooked, shortest ones half as long as notopodia, longest ones twice as long ( Fig. 3M View Fig ). Neuropodia conical, smooth (non-papillate), larger than notopodia. Neurochaetae only bifid falcigers: unit A, four falcigers with handles thick, with 5–7 transverse rows of fimbriae, blades medium-sized, 4 × as long as wide ( Fig. 3N View Fig ); unit B, three falcigers with handles thick with 7–8 transverse rows of fimbriae, blades medium-sized, 6–7 × as long as wide ( Fig. 3O View Fig ); unit C, eight falcigers with handles thick with 8–10 transverse rows of fimbriae, blades medium-sized, 5–6 × as long as wide ( Fig. 3P View Fig ); unit D, two falcigers with handles thick with 11–12 transverse rows of fimbriae, blades medium-sized, 5–6 × as long as wide ( Fig. 3Q View Fig ).

RIGHT PARAPODIUM FROM SEGMENT 32 (MIDDLE SEGMENT) ( Figs 3R View Fig , 4A View Fig ). Notopodia conical, smooth (nonpapillate), short, half as long as neuropodia, notopodial flange absent, with lobe instead. With up to

60 simple verticillate notochaetae, tips hooked, shortest ones as long as notopodia, longest ones 4× as long ( Figs 3S View Fig , 4B View Fig ). Neuropodia conical, papillate, larger than notopodia. Neurochaetae only falcigers: unit A, two falcigers with handles thick with 2 transverse rows of spines, blades short, 2× as long as wide ( Fig. 3T View Fig ); unit B, two falcigers with handles thick with 3 transverse rows of spines, blades medium-sized, 4–5 × as long as wide ( Figs 3U View Fig , 4C View Fig ); unit C, eight falcigers with handles slender, smooth, with subdistal transverse row of denticles, blades short, 2 × as long as wide ( Figs 3V View Fig , 4D View Fig ); subunit 1, three falcigers with handles thick, smooth, with subdistal transverse rows of denticles, blades short, 2× as long as wide ( Fig. 3W View Fig ); subunit 2, two falcigers with handles slender, smooth, blades medium-sized, 5–6 × as long as wide ( Fig. 3X View Fig ); unit D, two falcigers with handles slender, smooth, blades long, 8–10 × as long as wide ( Figs 3Y View Fig , 4E View Fig ).

PYGIDIUM. Rounded, with two anal cirri.

Remarks

Before this study, Dayipsammolyce was considered monotypic with D. ctenidophora , described from North Carolina, as its only species. Dayipsammolyce paulayi sp. nov. differs from D. ctenidophora in several features. Dayipsammolyce paulayi sp. nov. has the second right elytron pear-shaped, with only one median and one posterior process, whereas in D. ctenidophora it is subrectangular, with five posterior processes ( Pettibone 1997: 29, fig. 20b). Another relevant difference between both species is found in the neurochaetae from segment II. The neurochaetae of D. paulayi sp. nov. are falcigers with thick and whorled handles and short falcate blades, whereas in D. ctenidophora the neurochaetae are falcigers with slender handles covered by transverse rows of spines, and short straight blades ( Pettibone 1997: 28, fig. 18d).

Distribution

Caribbean Sea. Saint Martin, French Antilles.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF