Plagiomerus Crawford 1910
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4017.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BBFC3D93-6A7E-4862-84EF-021ADE2F4B3A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6117005 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC87E4-FFA9-4376-FF02-C7D18DBDFB76 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Plagiomerus Crawford 1910 |
status |
|
Plagiomerus Crawford 1910 View in CoL View at ENA
Hosts. Hemiptera : Diaspididae
diaspidis Crawford 1910: 90 View in CoL
Type. USNM
Distribution. W (Alameda, Butte, Inyo, Lassen, Los Angeles, Marin, Mendocino, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Yuba)
Host/habitat. Clavaspis sp., Diaspis echinocacti , Hemiberlesia lataniae ; NEW: Chionaspis ortholabis (EMEC), Lepidosaphes sp. (UCRC)
Remarks. De Santis (1979) lists “ Clovastis sp.” as a host—presumably a misspelling of “ Clavaspis sp.” Two species of Plagiomerus ( P. diaspidis and P. cyaneus Ashmead, 1888 ) reported from the Nearctic Region, and a third ( P. hospes Timberlake, 1920 ) from the Neotropical Region, are mostly distinguished from each other based on the color and relative dimensions of the funicle segments. Specimens from California (some from the same localities) generally resemble P. diaspidis , but reflect this range of antennal variation, suggesting a high degree of variation in this species, and that these characteristics are therefore of questionable use in distinguishing species.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
Plagiomerus Crawford 1910
Zuparko, Robert L. 2015 |
diaspidis
Crawford 1910: 90 |