Ellampus schulthessi subauratus Mocsáry, 1890

Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, Zootaxa 4908 (2), pp. 181-204 : 196-197

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:756BD41F-BEF3-4DDD-9478-A9E3BC8F78BA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4439739

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97B-D75B-0B07-FF6F-FEF0FA6D6F40

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ellampus schulthessi subauratus Mocsáry, 1890
status

 

Ellampus schulthessi subauratus Mocsáry, 1890

( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 A–D)

Ellampus schulthessi var. subauratus Mocsáry, 1890: 51 . Holotype ♂; Russia: Raddefka [= Evreyskaya autonomous Prov.: Radde] (ETHZ).

Ellampus sareptanus var. subauratus: Bischoff 1913: 9 (cat.).

Omalus sareptanus var. subauratus: Trautmann 1927: 36 (cat., descr.).

Omalus Horvathi [!] var. subaurata: Linsenmaier 1951: 96 (cat.).

Omalus (Omalus) sareptanus var. subauratus: Linsenmaier 1959: 20 (cat.).

Philoctetes schulthessi subauratus: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 257 (synonymous of Philoctetes sareptanus ( Mocsáry, 1889)) .

Type locality: Russia: “ Patria: Raddefka in territorio Amurensi Sibiriae (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi) ”.

Holotype, ♂: Raddefka // Schulthessi v. subauratus <handwritten in red> det. Mocsary // Omalus Pz. sareptanus Mocs . Linsenmaier det. 57.

Remarks. Ellampus subauratus was described as a subspecies of Ellampus schulthessi Mocsáry, 1890 and synonymised with Ellampus sareptanus Mocsáry, 1889 (currently Philoctetes sareptanus ) by Kimsey & Bohart (1991). However, it is separated from the latter by different punctation on the last metasomal tergum, which is very fine and dense in Ph. sareptanus , but sparse and shallow in Ph. subauratus . For this reason, we consider Philoctetes subauratus ( Mocsáry, 1890) spec. resurr. to be a separate species.

After type examination of both types, we can state that Philoctetes conifer ( Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932) is conspecific with Ph. subauratus . Semenov-Tian-Shanskij (1932) followed Bischoff’s (1913) classification of the species and wrote that he did not know Ph. sareptanus (“ mihi in natura ignotae specie ”) and consequently considered Ph. schulthessi and Ph. subauratus varieties of Ph. sareptanus . Here, we propose the synonymy Ellampus schulthessi subauratus Mocsáry, 1890 = Ellampus (Dictenulus) conifer Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932, syn. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Chrysididae

Genus

Ellampus

Loc

Ellampus schulthessi subauratus Mocsáry, 1890

Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael 2021
2021
Loc

Philoctetes schulthessi subauratus: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 257

Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. 1991: 257
1991
Loc

Omalus (Omalus) sareptanus var. subauratus:

Linsenmaier, W. 1959: 20
1959
Loc

Omalus

Linsenmaier, W. 1951: 96
1951
Loc

Omalus sareptanus var. subauratus:

Trautmann, W. 1927: 36
1927
Loc

Ellampus sareptanus var. subauratus:

Bischoff, H. 1913: 9
1913
Loc

Ellampus schulthessi var. subauratus Mocsáry, 1890: 51

Mocsary, A. 1890: 51
1890
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF