Goniobasis rubiginosa I. Lea, 1862
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.848.1993 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CD87E211-18D1-43DF-A4A4-70D8D111C969 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7458496 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87B3-FFA3-FFF0-52EC-FE772389B420 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Goniobasis rubiginosa I. Lea, 1862 |
status |
|
Goniobasis rubiginosa I. Lea, 1862
This name was established by Lea (1862: 270; 1863a: 333–334, pl. 38 fig. 193; 1863b: 155–156, pl. 38 fig. 193) based on two specimens sent to him by Wesley Newcomb, M.D., from “ Oregon ”. Tryon (1864, 1865, 1866, 1873) considered the species to be valid, despite having seen specimens only from Lea’s collection, and was confident they would be plicate if the initial whorls were not eroded ( Tryon 1865: 244). Pilsbry (1899) also considered the species to be valid. Henderson (1929) identified two specimens as this species in a lot of eight from Ahtanum Creek, Union Gap, in Yakima County, Washington; the other specimens in the lot were identified as Goniobasis draytonii . Henderson (1936b: 274) later admitted that one of the specimens was quite young, and in the other the carina was evidently the “result of disease or injury”. As mentioned above, the lot in question (UCM 15814) appears to be J. bulbosa as circumscribed herein and it does not resemble Lea’s (1863a, 1863b: pl. 38 fig. 193) original illustration of rubiginosa ( Fig. 27B View Fig ). Frest & Johannes (1995a: 246) provided the common name “Rusty Juga ”, and listed J. (J.) rubiginosa among species of uncertain status but considered it a potentially valid species and local endemic of conservation concern owing to agricultural impacts in the Yakima Valley. Later, Frest& Johannes (2010: 6) indicated it could be J. plicifera , but again expressed doubts as to its identity as a Juga . Other authors have considered the species to be conspecific with J. silicula ( Goodrich, 1942; Burch & Tottenham 1980; Burch 1982, 1989). J.P.E. Morrison annotated the label of the lectotype, USNM 119297 ( Graf 2001; Fig. 27B View Fig ), that the locality was incorrect, and was “probably North or South Carolina ”. Given that no Juga species are known to possess a single, prominent spiral keel, we agree with the interpretation of Morrison that this species is a mislocalized eastern North American pleurocerid. The paralectotype is filed under Elimia symmetrica (Haldeman, 1841) in the USNM collections. Three paralectotypes in the Newcomb collections at the Paleontological Research Institute (PRI 21730) appear conspecific with the specimens in the USNM.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |