Campodeinae Condé, 1956
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F8DAFD36-2878-438D-B7C0-B8D05531EC5C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345362 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87F2-FC3C-FFE4-294C-A6F6D923EE35 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Campodeinae Condé, 1956 |
status |
|
Subfamily Campodeinae Condé, 1956
Campodeinae Condé, 1956a: 94 .
Diagnosis ( Condé 1956a)
Epicuticle reticulated apparently smooth in optical microscopy, with microdenticles; presence of roseta formations; body covered with smooth to well-barbed macrosetae and setae; sensillum of third antennomere in dorsal or ventral position; labial pieces typical or slightly rotated in Remycampa ssp.; pronotal macrosetae formula up to 1+1 medial anterior, 1+1 lateral anterior, 1+1 lateral posterior; with or without trochanteral sensilla; with or without one dorsal femoral macrosetae; tibia with up to three short ventral macrosetae, usually only one; subequal simple claws without medial unguiculus except in Eutrichocampa hispanica Silvestri, 1932 ; claws with lateral crests in the genus Litocampa ; one pair of medial anterior and lateral anterior urotergal macrosetae at most and one or two pairs of lateral posterior urotergal macrosetae (exceptionaly three).
Habitat and distribution
Almost 75% of the campodeid species belongs to Campodeinae . The 300 species of Campodeinae are grouped in 28 genera ( Condé 1956a; Paclt 1957; Sendra 2015). They are distributed across nearly every terrestrial subsurface habitat, except in the polar regions or those under permafrost influence. Most species of Campodeinae inhabit more-or-less humid soils, but 34 occur in cave habitats, for which they show particular adapations (= troglomorphic traits).
Taxonomic key for genera and subgenera of the subfamily Campodeinae (including species of Eutrichocampa and Remycampa ) from the Euro-Mediterranean region
1. Lateral process of the pretarsus laminar and with a unique subtrapezoidal extreme; labium atypical............................................................................................................................................. 13
– Different shape of lateral process of the pretarsus, labium typical.................................................... 2
2. Unguiculus between claws absent ..................................................................................................... 3
– Unguiculus between claws present................................... Eutrichocampa hispanica Silvestri, 1932
3. Laminar lateral telotarsal process with short barbs on ventral side..................................................... ..................................................................................... Eutrichocampa thamugadensis Condé, 1947
– Lateral telotarsal process with side-shoot sharp ............. Oreocampa aff. minutella ( Silvestri, 1918)
– Subtrapezoidal laminar lateral telotarsal process with ending with or without pubescence ............... .................................................................................................... Libanocampa coiffaiti Condé, 1955
– Laminar lateral telotarsal process with long barbs on ventral side.................................................... 4
– Setiform and barbed lateral telotarsal process............ Eutrichocampa helvetica Wygodzinsky, 1941
– Laminar lateral telotarsal process with barbed both sides............ Edriocampa ghigii Silvestri, 1933
– Polymorphic lateral telotarsal process...................................................... Podocampa Silvestri, 1932
– Smooth setiform lateral telotarsal process......................................................................................... 6
4. Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; lateral posterior macrosetae in some urotergites 1+1 ................ ................................................................................................ Eutrichocampa aegea Silvestri, 1933
– Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0; medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 0+0; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0; without lateral posterior macrosetae in urotergite ................... 5
5. Lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; urosternite I 7+7 macrosetae; urosternites II–VII 4+4 macrosetae .................................................................................. Eutrichocampa remyi Condé, 1947
– Without lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae; urosternite I 4+4 macrosetae; urosternites II–VII 3+3 macrosetae .............................................................................. Eutrichocampa collina Ionescu, 1955
6. Elbow-like claws ....................................................................................... Litocampa Silvestri, 1933
– Regularly curved claws...................................................................................................................... 7
7. One dorsal femoral macrosetae ................................................................ Podocampa Silvestri, 1932
– Without dorsal femoral macrosetae ................................................................................................... 8
8. Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1 ..................................................................................... 9
– Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0 ................................................................................... 10
9. Lateral posterior macrosetae in some urotergites 2+2............ Helladocampa mahnerti Condé, 1984
– Lateral posterior macrosetae at least in urotergites 1+1 or 0+0........ Campodea s. str. Silvestri, 1932
10. Medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1 ................... ...................................................................................................................... Dicampa Silvestri, 1932
– Without medial anterior metanotal macrosetae; without medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae ....11
11. Lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1............................................ Monocampa Silvestri, 1932
– Without lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae................................................................................ 12
12. With 1+ l medial anterior, 1+1 lateral anterior and 1+1 lateral posterior pronotal macrosetae........... ................................................................................................................ Paurocampa Silvestri, 1932
– Without pronotal macrosetae ........................................ Spaniocampa relicta Sendra & López, 2020
13. Lateral posterior macrosetae on metanotum; 1+1 lateral posterior macrosetae on third and fourth urotergites ...................................................................................... Remycampa launeyi Condé, 1952
– Without lateral posterior macrosetae on metanotum and no lateral posterior macrosetae on third and fourth urotergites; cave-adapted traits ...................... Remycampa herbanica Sendra & Oromí, 2020
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |