Litocampa Silvestri, 1933
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F8DAFD36-2878-438D-B7C0-B8D05531EC5C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345571 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87F2-FC72-FF96-292F-A0D0D922ECC1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Litocampa Silvestri, 1933 |
status |
|
Genus Litocampa Silvestri, 1933
Litocampa Silvestri, 1933c: 117 .
Diagnosis ( Silvestri 1933c; Condé 1956a)
Notal formula with 1+1 ma, 1+1 la, 1+1 lp macrosetae on pronotum; 1+1 ma, 0+0 or 1+1 la, 1+1 lp on mesonotum, 0+0 or 1+1 ma, 0+0 or 1+1 lp on metanotum; with or without dorsal femoral macrosetae; one or two ventral tibial macrosetae; subequal to unequal elbow-like claws with small to large sized smooth lateral crests and smooth setiform telotarsal process; 0+0, 1+1 or 2+2 lp and 0+0 or 1+1 la macrosetae on III–VII urotergites; with or without medial anterior or medial posterior macrosetae on urotergites and abdominal segment; urosternite I with 7+7-6+6 macrosetae; II–VII with 6+6-4+4, although variability within each species not yet been studied. Species of Litocampa described outside North America and Europe ( Paclt 1957) should be placed in other genera such as Cocytocampa Paclt, 1957 ( Condé 1982a) or in new ones. The similarities found between some species of Podocampa is noticeable, the only difference seems to be small lateral claws and their similar distribution areas ( Condé, 1956a).
Habitat and distribution
Among the 33 described species of Litocampa , including the American species, 23 inhabit cave ecosystems in their deep zones and are considered cave adapted.Although there are several soil-dwelling species in Europe, e.g., L. humilis (Condé, 1948) , L. cognata (Condé, 1948) or L. tuzetai (Condé, 1948) , the main life-style tendency is to inhabit caves as well as MSS ( Bareth 1983; Condé 1956a; Condé & Mathieu 1957; Sendra et al. 2013). Litocampa has a disjunt distribution on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, it is found in karst territories and the regions surrounding the Appalachian Mountains in the United States ( Condé 1949a) and in Europe from the Cantabrian Mountains throughout the Pyrenees towards the Central Massif in France ( Condé 1956a; Sendra et al. 2003) in many caves, and reaching central and eastern Europe in moisty habitats, including natural and artificial caves ( Condé 1956a; Sendra et al. 2012) ( Fig. 62 View Fig ).
Taxonomic key for species of the genus Litocampa
1. Dorsal femoral macrosetae absent..................................................................................................... 2
– Dorsal femoral macrosetae present.................................................................................................... 8
2. Lateral posterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; lateral anterior macrosetae of the fifth urotergite 1+1.. ........................................................................................................................................................... 3
– Without lateral posterior metanotal macrosetae; whithout lateral anterior macrosetae of the fifth urotergite............................................................................................................................................ 7
3. Male g 1 glandular setae present in two separated areas; without lateral posterior macrosetae of the fifth urotergite................................................................................ Litocampa vandeli (Condé, 1947)
– Male g 1 glandular setae present in a continuous area; lateral posterior macrosetae of the fifth urotergite 1+1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
4. Medial anterior macrosetae of the eighth urotergite 1+1................................................................... 5
– Without medial anterior macrosetae of the eighth urotergite ............................................................ 6
5. Medial posterior macrosetae of the ninth abdominal segment 1+1; cave-adapted body shape; complex sensillum of the cupuliform organ.................................................. Litocampa tuzetai (Condé, 1948)
– Without medial posterior macrosetae of the ninth abdominal segment; body shape non-cave-adapted; simple sensillum of the cupuliform organ ................................ Litocampa montana ( Ionescu, 1955)
6. Medial anterior macrosetae of the first urotergite 1+1; medial anterior macrosetae of the second urotergite 1+1; medial anterior macrosetae of the third urotergite 1+1; medial anterior macrosetae of the fourth urotergite 1+1............................................................... Litocampa cognata (Condé, 1948)
– Without medial anterior macrosetae in first to fourth urotergites........................................................ ...................................................................................................... Litocampa humilis (Condé, 1948)
7. Medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; lateral anterior macrosetae of the sixth urotergite 1+1; lateral posterior macrosetae on sixth and seventh urotergites 1+1 Litocampa sollaudi ( Denis, 1930)
– Without medial anterior metanotal macrosetae; without lateral anterior macrosetae of the sixth urotergite; without lateral posterior macrosetae on sixth and seventh urotergites............................... ................................................................................................... Litocampa bourgoini (Condé, 1948)
8. Male g 1 glandular setae absent........................................................................................................... 9
– Male g 1 glandular setae present in a continuous area....................................................................... 10
9. Medial anterior macrosetae of the first urotergite 1+1; medial anterior macrosetae on second to fourth urotergites 1+1 ................................................ Litocampa mendesi Sendra & Reboleira, 2010
– Without medial anterior macrosetae on first to fourth urotergites....................................................... ..................................................................................................... Litocampa espanoli (Condé, 1949)
10. Lateral anterior pronotal macrosetae 2+2............................ Litocampa quadrisetigera Bareth, 2001
– Lateral anterior pronotal macrosetae 1+1 .........................................................................................11
11. Lateral posterior macrosetae of the fourth urotergite 2+2................................................................... ............................................................... Litocampa zaldivarae Sendra, Salgado & Monedero, 2003
– Lateral posterior macrosetae of the fourth urotergite 1+1 ............................................................... 12
– Without lateral posterior macrosetae of the fourth urotergite.......................................................... 13
12. Lateral posterior macrosetae of the fifth to seventh urotergites 2+2; medial posterior macrosetae of the eighth urotergite 1+1.................................................................. Litocampa hubarti Bareth, 1999
– Lateral posterior macrosetae of the fifth to seventh urotergites 1+1; without medial posterior macrosetae of the eighth urotergite.................................................... Litocampa henryi Condé, 1951
13. Male a 2 glandular setae absent....................................................... Litocampa drescoi (Condé, 1949)
– Male a glandular setae present .................................................... Litocampa coiffaiti (Condé, 1948)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Litocampa Silvestri, 1933
Sendra, Alberto & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S. 2020 |
Litocampa
Silvestri F. 1933: 117 |