Platystethus luae Zheng, 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3915.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BEAD42C0-1031-4C82-A71A-15A670C3467A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6114342 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE8795-FFC9-A459-FF11-A450FBE5FF12 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Platystethus luae Zheng, 2000 |
status |
|
7. Platystethus luae Zheng, 2000 View in CoL
( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 ; 17; 18)
Zheng, 2000: 112 (Type locality: Sichuan, Mt. Emei (29.30N 103.20E), 1500m, 1982-VII-30); Smetana, 2004: 518 (subgenus Craetopycrus ); Yan, Li & Zheng, 2004: 342.
Material examined. 4 specimens, 2♂♂, 2♀♀. CHINA: Sichuan: 1♂, Baoxing, Fengtongzhai [30.53ºN 102.91ºE], 1795 m, mixed coniferous broad leaved forest, pitfall trap, 2001. VI.30–VII.3, X.-D. Yu & H.-Z. Zhou legg. (IZ-CAS); 1♂, Mt. Emei, 1983. VII.26, Z.- Y. Gou leg. ( CWNU); 1♀, Mt. Emei, Wan Nian Si [=Wan Nian Temple, 29.58ºN 103.38ºE], 1983. VII.26 [suspicious, for “26” written over “22”], “ III-12 ” ( CWNU). Guizhou: 1♀, Mt. Fanjing [27.94ºN 108.61º1], 1550 m, 2006. VIII.8, Z.-L. Zhang leg. ( CWNU). [Note: the CWNU specimens (1♂ 1♀) from Mt. Emei were identified by Prof. Zheng as “ paratype ” [in Chinese] on the stopper and tape of containing vials, but we did not find the label information of each present in the original material where there were no specimens collected on 1983. VII.26.]
Redescription. Body ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 A, B) shiny and dark brown; mouthparts and legs reddish brown. Body small in size, length [average]: ♂, 2.65 mm; ♀, 2.7 mm.
Male. Head ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 A; 17C) broadest at eyes. Disc pubescent, with setal punctures large but sparse, no microstriae. Clypeus with surface delicate and not punctate, protruding beyond anterior border of supra-antennal ridges, anterior margin truncate without modification. Epistomal suture fine and posteromedially directed. Supra-antennal ridges elevated. Vertex depressed anteriorly, without mid-longitudinal suture, where with setal puncture instead. Eyes convex, equal with temples in length, with fine facets; orbital sulcus fine. Temple slightly dilated laterally.
Neck constricted, and demarcated by occipital suture. Occipital suture integral and slightly curved. Mandible ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 A) short and incurved; bearing 3 teeth on inner edge: 2 large with 1 tiny in between.
Pronotum ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 A; 17C) wider than or equal with head, widest at anterior 1/3, with mid-longitudinal sulcus reduced, micro-striae absent, with a few large punctures lined or clustered; anterior margin broadly emarginate, anterior lateral angles less prominent, posterior angles rounded; lateral and posterior margins without crenulation, near lateral margin with shallow punctate depression. Scutellum with crest-shaped impression. Elytra ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 A) with posterior margin roundly truncate, elytral suture not overlapping.
Abdominal sternite VII ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 C; 18C) with posterior margin deep and semicircularly emarginate in middle, where modified by short semicircular membrane (not beyond posterior margin). Sternite VIII ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 D; 18D) posterior margin with broad, deep and sub-trapezoidal emargination.
Aedeagus ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 G–I; 18G–J) with median lobe ovoid; apical orifice fissure-like, reaching middle of ventral surface, edges of ventral fissure protruding into a pair of sharp triangular spines; internal sac with sclerite-like and membranous parts, not rolling. Paramere arm-like; basal arm with furrow; apical arm slightly explanate, furnished with setae at apex, with another seta near apex of ventral edge, by which a few pits lined.
Female. Similar to male ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 B; 17B, D; 18B). Abdominal sternite VII without modification, sternite VIII ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 E; 18E) gradually narrowed, with posterior margin nearly truncate and slightly protruding in middle. Spermatheca ( Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 F; 18F) constricted at middle, basal part inflated; apical part short, curved at apex.
Distribution. China (Guizhou, Sichuan).
Remarks. Similar to P. quedenfeldti Weise, 1879 , but P. quedenfeldti is with prominent posterior corners on the pronotum, and with two short spines on the posterior margin of sternite VIII.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |