Schiodtella japonica, Imura, Jimpei & Ishikawa, Tadashi, 2009

Imura, Jimpei & Ishikawa, Tadashi, 2009, A review of Schiodtella formosana, with some remarks on the genus Schiodtella and description of a Japanese new species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Cydnidae), Zootaxa 2315, pp. 19-30 : 21-25

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.192017

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6226901

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE87E8-AB24-6763-FF6E-87E11001FCC8

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Schiodtella japonica
status

sp. nov.

Schiodtella japonica new species

( Figs. 1–16 View FIGURE 1 – 9 View FIGURE 10 – 16 , 31–36 View FIGURE 31 – 39 )

Stibaropus formosanus: Hasegawa, 1960: 24 , fig. 4; Miyamoto, 1965: 75, pl. 38, fig. 11; Miyamoto and Yasunaga, 1989: 183.

Diagnosis. Eyes moderately small ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ); ocular index 6.2–8.3. Apical process of peritreme indistinct ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ). Tarsi present ( Figs. 5, 7 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ). Median arm of basal plate of penis surpassing lateral arms ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ); conjunctival appendage strongly protruding and recurved downwards in rest ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ). Distal part of spermathecal duct longer than dilation ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ).

In general appearance, this species resembles Sc. secunda Lis, 1991 from China ( Lis 1991b), but it is separable from the latter by its larger eyes (ocular index is 6.2–8.3 in the former, and 10.2–12.8 in the latter) and a more developed conjunctival appendage of the penis (protruding well beyond the phallotreme in the former ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ), and not externally visible in the latter).

Description. Male: holotype ― total length 4.8; total width 3.2; body 4.4 long, 2.5 high; head 1.0 long, 1.05 wide; length of antennal segments I 0.17, II 0.34, III 0.23, IV 0.33; length of rostral segments I 0.45, II 0.5, III 0.35, IV 0.3; pronotum 1.5 long, 2.64 wide; scutellum 2.14 long, 1.85 wide; hemelytron 3.4 long.

Body castaneous to dark castaneous, darker in dorsum. Eyes red; ocelli orange. Antennae and rostrum yellowish brown to light castaneous. Hemelytral caria slightly lighter than pronotum and scutellum; hemelytral membranes semi-hyaline. Legs light castaneous to castaneous; apical half of protibia blackish; tarsi yellowish brown.

Total length about 1.5 times as long as total width, 1.9 times as long as body height. Head ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) moderately wrinkled in dorsum; clypeus ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) slightly shorter than paraclypei; paraclypeus ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) fringed with 10 or 11 peg-bearing tubercles, ventrally bearing several setae of various length; primary setae III–V ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) thickened, longer and slenderer than secondary ones. Eyes and ocelli ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) moderately small; ocular index 7.8; ocellar index 5.5; interocellar index 5.0. Setae on antenna thin and dense, but slightly thicker and sparser in segment II; approximate proportion of antennal segments I to IV 1.0: 2.0: 1.4: 2.0. Rostrum reaching mesocoxae; approximate proportion of segments I to IV 1.5: 1.7: 1.2: 1.0. Pronotum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) distinctly wrinkled in posterior half, and with 20–22 setae on lateral margin and 2 setae behind callus ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ), on each side. Scutellum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) evenly wrinkled. Thoracic pleura slightly wrinkled; apical process of peritreme indistinct ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ). Hemelytron ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) moderately developed, surpassing lateral margin and tip of abdomen; corium ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) covered with small punctures and wrinkles, bearing 2 rows of small punctures on mesocorium and 1 or 2 rows of them on clavus alongside claval suture, and with 6 or 8 setae on costal margin; clavus ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) with 1 seta basally. Protibia ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ) more or less covered with setae in proximal 4/5 on anterior and ventral sides, and with 5 or 6 spines on tibial edge. Setae on mesotibia ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) longer in dorsum and finer in posterior side, gradually becoming stouter toward tibial apex in anterior and dorsal sides. Setae on metatibia ( Figs. 7, 8 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) thinner in posterior side, gradually becoming stouter toward corbicle in anterior and dorsal sides, arranging in 1 rough, longitudinal row on corbicle. Tarsus sparsely covered with fine setae. Abdominal sternites III to VII moderately covered with setae of variable length and thickness. Posteriorly exposed part of terminalia densely covered with setae.

Paratypes ― total length 4.0–4.9; total width 2.8–3.3.

General aspect similar to holotype. Paraclypeus fringed with 7–11 peg-bearing tubercles. Ocular index 6.2–8.3. Lateral margin of pronotum and costal margin of hemelytron with 12–24 and 4–9 setae, respectively. Genital capsule with medial process on apicoventral margin. Penis ( Figs. 10, 11 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ) with strongly sclerotized and pigmented theca; median arm of basal plate surpassing lateral arms ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ); conjunctival appendage strongly protruding from phallotreme and recurved downwards in rest ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ). Paramere ( Fig. 12–14 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ) covered with setae; hypophysis moderately sharpened ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ).

Female: paratypes ― total length 4.6–5.8; total width 3.1–3.8.

General aspect similar to male. In some specimens hemelytra remarkably developed ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 1 – 9 ) and tarsi also more developed (see below for detail). Setae on mediotergite VIII smaller in medial part ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ). Paratergite IX ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ) continuous with gonocoxa II, sharply prominent laterally; gonocoxae II continuously pigmented to each other through midline ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ). Distal part of spermathecal duct longer than dilation, clearly thinner than proximal part ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ); flanges of intermediate part larger in diameter than receptacle ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 10 – 16 ).

Type materials. Holotype 3, “Akatsuka-tameike Park, Akatsuka, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo Pref., JAPAN, May 26, 2008, Jimpei IMURA leg.” Paratypes 18326♀ — Japan: Honshu: same locality as holotype: 435♀, 26.V.2008, J. Imura leg. (TUA); 635♀, 21.IV.2008, J. Imura & G. Kaji leg. (TUA); 13, 23.XII.2007, T. Tsurumaki leg. (TUA); Komaba, Tokyo: 13, 1930, R. Sawa leg. ( ELKU); Hiratsuka Beach, Kanagawa Pref.: 13, 11.X.1961, N. Watanabe leg. (TUA); 1♀, 28.IX.1958, Y. Shibata leg. (TUA). Kyushu: Kashii, Fukuoka Pref.: 1♀, 25.IX.1959, Y. Hirashima leg. ( ELKU); Mt. Aso, 800 m alt.: 2♀, 30.VIII.1958, Fujimura leg. ( ELKU); Kusasenrigahama, Aso-shi, Kumamoto Pref.: 5312♀, 14.X.2007, Y. Utsunomiya leg. (OMM).

form sex scutellum hemelytron protarsus mesotarsus metatarsus

form with shortened wings 3 1.97 3.08 0.64 0.38 0.35 3 2.00 3.00 0.52 0.40 0.30 3 2.06 3.28 0.55 0.38 0.32 Ƥ 2.06 3.54 0.65 0.46 0.38 3 2.13 3.30 0.62 0.40 0.35 3 2.15 3.50 0.65 0.40 0.35 Ƥ 2.16 3.54 0.55 0.40 0.36 3 2.17 3.60 0.60 0.40 0.35 3 2.18 3.44 0.52 0.40 0.38 Ƥ 2.18 3.60 0.60 0.45 0.33 Ƥ 2.18 3.76 0.67 0.50 0.43 Ƥ 2.20 3.70 0.60 0.43 0.40 3 2.23 3.40 0.60 0.40 0.38 3 2.25 3.50 – 0.45 0.42 Ƥ 2.36 3.90 0.68 – 0.42

macropterous form Ƥ 2.30 4.45 0.80 0.62 0.55 Ƥ 2.36 4.68 0.78 0.60 0.53 Ƥ 2.38 4.50 0.80 0.60 0.53 Distribution. Japan: Honshu, Kyushu.

Etymology. The name is derived from the type locality.

Remarks. As shown in the synonymy above, this species has previously been known under the name Stibaropus formosanus in Japan ( Hasegawa 1960; Miyamoto 1965; Miyamoto & Yasunaga 1989). The species St. formosanus or Schiodtella formosana from mainland China is closely related with or, perhaps, conspecific with Sc. japonica sp. nov., judging from the descriptions provided by Esaki and Ishihara (1951) and Lis (1994). However, a final conclusion about the identity of the Chinese species is on hold until the specimens become available for examination.

The tarsi and the hemelytra, especially their membranes, obviously vary in length among individuals, even among those from a single locality. Table 1 shows the lengths of the tarsi and hemelytra of 18 specimens (nine males and nine females, including the holotype) from one location in Tokyo. Based on the lengths of the hemelytra, the specimens are roughly divided into two types: a form with shortened wings (hemelytral length / scutellar length <1.75), and macropterous form with longer wings (hemelytral length / scutellar length> 1.85); the latter form is shown only in the female. Such a wing dimorphism is also known in the Brazilian Atarsocoris giselleae Carvalho, 1952 (= A. macroptera Becker, 1967) within the tribe Scaptocorini. In addition to the variation of the hemelytra, interestingly, the tarsi, peculiar to those of the hind legs, are also variable in length among the specimens, despite no significant difference in relative body size among the specimens. The shortened tarsus, moreover, accompanies a decrement in the size of the pretarsus ( Figs. 31– 36 View FIGURE 31 – 39 ).

Biology. According to Hasegawa (1960), this species lives in soil covered with vegetation, such as upland rice Oryza sativa L., goose-grass Eleusine indica Gaertn and Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) (Poaceae) . In Tokyo, it was also noted that adults are sometimes attracted by artificial light around August and appear on the ground for copulation around October ( Hasegawa 1960). Through our field observations in Tokyo, young to old nymphs and adults were found in January 2008 from a soil depth of 10–20 cm under vegetation, such as Penisetum alopecuroides (L.), Imperata cylindrica Beauv. , Miscanthus racemosum DC. ( Poaceae ), and other lower plants.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cydnidae

Genus

Schiodtella

Loc

Schiodtella japonica

Imura, Jimpei & Ishikawa, Tadashi 2009
2009
Loc

Stibaropus formosanus:

Miyamoto 1989: 183
Miyamoto 1965: 75
Hasegawa 1960: 24
1960
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF