Tafana huatanay, De Oliveira & Brescovit, 2021

De Oliveira, Luiz Fernando M. & Brescovit, Antonio Domingos, 2021, Taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of ghost spiders of the genus Tafana Simon, 1903 (Araneae: Dionycha, Anyphaenidae), with the descriptions of twelve new species, European Journal of Taxonomy 742, pp. 1-77 : 33-36

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.742.1291

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:23424EC3-8440-4C72-AD9E-C1EC3087F7CA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4658616

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE788AB4-AF1A-4605-8F07-9403EFF8DADD

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:DE788AB4-AF1A-4605-8F07-9403EFF8DADD

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tafana huatanay
status

sp. nov.

Tafana huatanay View in CoL sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:DE788AB4-AF1A-4605-8F07-9403EFF8DADD

Figs 19–20 View Fig View Fig , 33A View Fig , 34 View Fig

Diagnosis

Males of Tafana huatanay sp. nov. resemble those of T. riveti , T. humahuaca sp. nov. and T. nevada sp. nov. by having the short embolus, but differ by having the base of the embolus wide ( Figs 19C View Fig , 20A–C View Fig ). Females resemble those of T. riveti , T. humahuaca sp. nov. and T. nevada sp. nov. by having the epigynal plate with curved lateral lobes in anterior region, but differ by having the copulatory ducts medially flattened and secondary spermathecae on the sides of the primary spermathecae in dorsal view ( Figs 19F–G View Fig , 33A View Fig ).

Etymology

The specific name, a noun in apposition, is a tribute to the ‘Sacred Valley of the Incas’ called Huatanay.

Material examined

Holotype PERU • 1 ♂; Cusco, Parque Wiñay Wuyna ; [13°30′30″ S, 71°58′18″ W]; 10 Feb. 1990; D. Silva leg.; MUSM. GoogleMaps

Paratype PERU • 1 ♀; Paucartambo, Pilcopata , National Park Del Manu Carretera ; [12°08′00″ S, 71°40′00″ W]; 2700 m a.s.l.; 19 Feb. 1990; D. Silva leg.; MUSM GoogleMaps .

Other material

BOLIVIA – La Paz • 2 ♀♀; Sainami , Valley of the Zongo ; [16°29′39″ S; 68°08′51″ W]; 4 Aug. 1993; A.D. Brescovit leg.; IBSP 258182 View Materials GoogleMaps .

COLOMBIA – Neiva • 1 ♀; Huila, Finca Meremberg , 10 km E of Santa Leticia; [2°59′55″ N, 75°18′16″ W]; Mar. 1979; W. Eberhard leg.; MCZ GoogleMaps .

ECUADOR – Quito • 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Golf Club ; [0°15′00″ S, 78°35′00″ W]; 21 Jul. 1958; A.M. Nadler leg.; AMNH GoogleMaps .

PERU – Cusco • 3 ♀♀; Carretera to Manu National Park, Paucartambo , Pilcopata ; [12°08′00″ S, 71°40′00″ W]; 17–19 Feb. 1990; D. Silva leg.; MUSM GoogleMaps 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding but 18 Feb. 1990; MUSM GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Calca, Hacienda Urco ; [13°19′09″ S, 71°57′1700″ W]; 15 Oct. 1939; K.P. Schmidt leg.; FMNH .

Description

Male (holotype, MUSM)

COLOR. Carapace orange ( Fig. 19A View Fig ). Labium, sternum and endites yellow. Chelicerae reddish. Legs I–IV yellow, darker at tarsi. Abdomen gray with dark spots ( Fig. 19A View Fig ).

MEASUREMENTS. Total length 5.6, carapace length 2.7, width 2.1. Clypeus height 0.06. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.1, PME 0.12, PLE 0.1; AME–AME 0.06, AME–ALE 0.06, PME– PME 0.14, PME–PLE 0.14, ALE–PLE 0.04. Chelicerae 1.7 long, with four promarginal teeth and four retromarginal denticles.

LEG MEASUREMENTS. I—femur 2.2 /patella 0.9/ tibia 2.1/ metatarsus 1.8/ tarsus 1.0 /total 8.0; II— 2.0/ 1.0/ 1.9 /1.7 / 0.9/ 7.5; III—1.8 / 0.9/ 1.3/ 1.5/ 0.5/ 6.0; IV—2.5/ 1.1/ 2.15 / 2.7/ 0.7/ 9.15.

LEG SPINATION. I—tibia v2-2-2, metatarsus v2-0-0; II—tibia v1-2-2, p0-1-0; III—tibia v1-2-2, p0-1-1, r0-1-1; IV—tibia p1-1-1.

PALP. Retrolateral tibial apophysis short and curved; cymbium with retrolateral projection; apophysis at the base of the embolus short and furrowed; embolus short; ventral tegular process near the median apophysis; sperm duct with secondary looping reaching the apex of the tegulum ( Figs 19C–E View Fig , 20A–C View Fig ).

ABDOMEN. Length 2.8, epigastric furrow 0.7 from tracheal spiracle, spiracle 1.0 from base of spinnerets.

Female (paratype, MUSM)

COLOR. Coloration as in males of this species, except for reddish carapace and chelicerae reddish brown ( Fig. 19B View Fig ).

MEASUREMENTS. Total length 6.0, carapace length 2.1, width 1.7. Clypeus height 0.06. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.1, PME 0.1, PLE 0.1; AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE 0.04, PME– PME 0.12, PME–PLE 0.12, ALE–PLE 0.04. Chelicerae 1.1 long, with four promarginal teeth and three retromarginal denticles.

LEG MEASUREMENTS. I—femur 1.5 / patella 0.63 / tibia 1.3 /metatarsus 1.1 /tarsus 0.6/ total 5.13; II— 1.42 / 0.5/ 1.1/ 1.1/ 0.6 /4.72; III—1.2/ 0.6/ 0.8 /1.1 /0.4 / 4.1; IV—1.6 / 0.6 /1.3 / 1.4/ 0.6/ 5.5.

LEG SPINATION. I—tibia v2-2-0, metatarsus v2-0-0; II—tibia v2-2-0; III—tibia v1-2-2, p0-1-1, r0-1-1, metatarsus v2-1-2; IV—tibia p0-1-1, r0-1-1.

EPIGYNUM. Hood semircular, with sclerotized lateral lobes; atrium narrow and elongated; epigynal plate covered by cuticle in the posterior region; lateral lobes extremely curved in anterior region. Internally, copulatory ducts sinuous and flattened; primary spermathecae large and oval; secondary spermathecae lateral to the primary spermathecae, rounded, and fertilization ducts long ( Figs 19F–G View Fig , 20E View Fig , 33A View Fig ).

ABDOMEN. Length 3.8, epigastric furrow 0.8 from tracheal spiracle, spiracle 1.7 from base of spinnerets.

Variation

Five males: total length 4.4–7.9; carapace 2.0–3.3; femur I 1.9–2.6. Six females: total length 4.3–5.3; carapace 1.8–2.0; femur I 1.3–1.5.

Distribution

Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia ( Fig. 34 View Fig ).

FMNH

USA, Illinois, Chicago, Field Museum of Natural History (also used by Finnish Museum of Natural History)

MCZ

Museum of Comparative Zoology

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

FMNH

Field Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Anyphaenidae

Genus

Tafana

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF