Bandicota indica (Bechstein, 1800)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7353098 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7283673 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087AE-FFB8-FFF5-FF0A-09D0F935FA1C |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Bandicota indica (Bechstein, 1800) |
status |
|
Bandicota indica (Bechstein, 1800) View in CoL . In Pennant, Allgemeine Ueber Vierfuss. Thiere, 2:497.
TYPE LOCALITY: India, Pondicherry .
DISTRIBUTION: Sri Lanka, peninsular India north to Nepal, NE India (Assam), Burma, S China (Yunnan and Hong Kong Isl), Taiwan, Thailand, Laos, and Vietnam. Introduced into Kedah and Perlis regions of Malay Peninsula ( Harrison, 1956; J. T. Marshall, Jr., 1977a) as well as Sumatra and Java ( Musser and Newcomb, 1983). Its spotty distribution may reflect other geographic introductions ( Taiwan for example); "since it is commensal, large, and delicious to eat, this bandicoot may have been spread by man in comparatively recent times" (J. T. Marshall, Jr., 1977a:428).
SYNONYMS: bandicota (of Bechstein, 1800; see Ellerman, 1941), elliotanus , eloquens , gigantea , jabouillei , kagii, macropus , malabarica , mordax , nemorivaga, perchai, setifera, siamensis , taiwanus.
COMMENTS: Morphologically more closely related to B. savilei than to B. bengalensis , but based on gel electrophoretic comparisons closer to Nesokia than to other species of Bandicota ( Radtke and Niethammer, 1984 /85). Chromosomal data for Thai samples provided by Markvong et al. (1973). A careful systematic revision is necessary to assess the significance of morphological and biochemical variation among samples. Pradhan et al. (1989), for example, argued that B. gigantea is specifically distinct from B. indica, and indicated they are pursuing a taxonomic revision of the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.