Hadrodemius comans (Sampson)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.294282 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6200121 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D10403-FF90-4C7D-38F2-4FD2FBE2F995 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hadrodemius comans (Sampson) |
status |
|
Hadrodemius comans (Sampson) View in CoL
( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 –2, 7–8)
Xyleborus comans Sampson, 1919: 109 View in CoL .
Hadrodemius comans (Sampson) View in CoL : Wood & Bright, 1992: 819. Xyleborus amorphus Eggers, 1926: 147 View in CoL . Syn.n.
Xyleborus metacomans Eggers, 1930: 188 View in CoL . Syn.n.
Taxonomy: I have examined female syntypes of H.comans View in CoL (NHML) and X.amorphus View in CoL (NMW), and compared them with specimens in my own collection (RAB) from Brunei, Taiwan, Thailand and West Malaysia. I have also compared the latter with specimens in NMB from Laos and Vietnam. It has not been possible to examine the holotype of X.metacomans View in CoL from India held by the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, but I have compared a specimen from Thailand which agrees very well with Eggers' description of the species. X.amorphus View in CoL from Taiwan was separated by Eggers (1926, 1939) because the discal striae are distinct and have larger punctures than those on the interstriae, whereas in H.comans View in CoL from Malaysia and Indonesia the strial and interstrial punctures are of similar size and the striae are indistinct. However, specimens from Vietnam and Laos are intermediate in this respect. Eggers (1930) distinguished the Indian species, X.metacomans View in CoL from H.comans View in CoL by the denser and finer puncturation of the elytral declivity, and the denser and longer vestiture. The declivity is also matt rather than shining. However, these characters are rather variable in H.comans View in CoL , and insufficient to distinguish species. I have also compared a male syntype of X.amorphus View in CoL (NMW) and males from Brunei Darussalam, Taiwan and West Malaysia in my collection. They are almost identical, and not specifically separable. It is clear that there is only a single rather variable species. The male has been described by Eggers (1939, as X.amorphus View in CoL ), and Kumar & Chandra (1977, as X.metacomans View in CoL ).
Distribution: Brunei, China (Fujian, Xizang), India (Assam, West Bengal), Indonesia (Java, Kalimantan, Sumatra), Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam.
New Records: BRUNEI, Kuala Belalong FSC, 4o34’N, 115o7E, dipterocarp forest, 220 m, aerial FIT, 8.vi.1991 (N.Mawdsley) (1); as previous except: 275 m, 3.vii.1991 (1); as previous except: 260 m, 16.vii.1991 (1) (NHML); LAOS, Bolimkhamxai prov., Ban Nape (8km NE), 18o21’N, 105o08’E, c. 600m, 1–18.v.2001 (V.Kubán) (1) (NMB); THAILAND, Chiangmai, Doi Suthep, 7.viii.2002 (R.A.Beaver, K.Koivisto) (1) (RAB); VIETNAM, Tonkin, Vinhphu prov., Tandao, 2–11.vi.1985 (V.Kubán) (1) (NMB).
Biology: A polyphagous species recorded from at least 14 families and 22 genera of angiosperm trees. Browne (1961) briefly describes the gallery system, which is typical of the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hadrodemius comans (Sampson)
Beaver, Roger A. 2010 |
Hadrodemius comans
Wood 1992: 819 |
Eggers 1926: 147 |
Xyleborus metacomans
Eggers 1930: 188 |
Xyleborus comans
Sampson 1919: 109 |