Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus, 1905

Ferreira, André da Silva, Grossi, Paschoal C. & Seidel, Matthias, 2022, The taxonomic status of Pelidnota gounellei (Ohaus, 1908) and Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus, 1905 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Melolonthidae), Revista Brasileira de Entomologia (e 20220025) 66 (4), pp. 1-12 : 3-8

Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus, 1905 rev. stat. ( Figs. 6 A-6I, 7A-7F, 8A-

8G, 9A-9F and 10A-10I)

Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus, 1905: 317 [original description].

Pelidnota (Pelidnota) ludovici Ohaus [new subgeneric combination by Ohaus (1918, p. 25)].

Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus [removal of subgeneric classification by Soula (2009, pp. 39-40)].

Type material: 1 male holotype ( Fig.6 A-6C) of Pelidnota ludovici at ZSM: “Espirito Sto. / Timbuhy / L. Ohaus S. // 21.xii.98. // 1 // Pelidnota / Ludovici / Cotype Ohs. // Staatssammlung / München, 1975 / Erwerb Coll. / Machatschke // HOLOTYPE / Pelidnota ludovici / Ohaus, 1905 / det. M. Seidel 2019 // WORLD / SCARAB. / DATABASE / WSD00344827” ( Fig. 6E ) .

Examined material: BRASIL: Bahia:Itamaraju , 26.x.1985, Becker, J. leg. (1 female) ( MZFS) ; 28.x1985, Becker, J. leg. (4 males) ( MZFS) ; 31.x.1985, Becker, J.leg.(3 males); 31.x.1985, Becker,J. leg.(1 male, 1 female) ( CERPE) .

Distribution. BRAZIL: Bahia, Espírito Santo ( Ohaus, 1905, 1918, 1934; Blackwelder, 1944; Machatschke, 1972; Krajcik, 2008; Soula, 2009; Moore et al., 2017) ( Fig. 18 ).

Remarks. Pelidnota ludovici was described by Ohaus (1905), likely named after the brother of Ohaus “L.[=Ludovic or Ludwig] Ohaus”, based on a unique male specimen collected in the state of Espírito Santo: “... Ufer des Rio Doce zwischen Baixo Timbuhy und Guandú gefunden...”, right bank of the Rio Doce, between Baixo Guandu [Baixo Guandú] and Timbuhy [Timbui, today is the District of the municipality of Fundão].In the original description the author compared P.ludovici with P.burmeisteri and recently, based principally in the dorsal and ventral coloration of the body, and in male genitalia and other characters not specified by the authors, Moore et al. (2017) proposed P. ludovici as a new synonym of P.burmeisteri tricolor Nonfried, 1894 . According to Moore et al. (2017), specimens of P. ludovici examined by the authors present the following set of characters: ventral surface metallic rufous with metallic green shine (black with metallic green shine in P. burmeisteri ); legs metallic rufous or purple (black in P. burmeisteri ); head shiny, metallic green (also in P. burmeisteri ); pronotum, scutellar shield, and elytra metallic rufous with green shine (pronotum and scutellar shield metallic green, elytra black and shiny in P. burmeisteri ). Finally, Moore et al. (2017), based on comparison of specimens of P. ludovici and a lectotype of P. burmeisteri tricolor in ZMHB (male genitalia and other characters, not specified by the authors), considered these taxa to be conspecific. The holotype of P.ludovici has recently been discovered in ZSM, where it was obtained in 1975 with the purchase of the Machatschke collection. It is unclear if the holotype legitimately belonged to Machatschke or the SDEI (Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Müncheberg, Berlin) which was Machatschke’s former workplace. Soula (2009) only cites the locality from Ohaus (1905) and did not see the type at ZMHB, as mistakenly interpreted by Moore et al. (2017).

Here, we present a new set of characters, based on a series of P.ludovici ( Figs. 6 A-6I, 7A-7F, 8A-8G, 9A-9F and 10A-10I) specimens, followed by the characters in parentheses referring to P. burmeisteri ( Figs. 1 A- 1F, 2A-2G, 3A-3F and 4A-4G) examined in our study: dorsal ( Figs. 6 A- 6B, 7A-7D and 8A-8B) and ventral side rufous ( Figs. 6C and 7 C-7F) with metallic green reflections, elytron with lateral margin and apex purple ( Fig. 1 A-1D) (head, pronotum ( Figs. 1 A-1D and 2A-2B) and pygidium ( Fig. 2C ) metallic green with purple reflections on lateral margins, scutellar shield ( Fig. 1 A-1D) and ventral side rufous with metallic green reflections ( Fig.1 C-1F), elytron black ( Fig. 1 A-1D)); legs metallic purple ( Fig. 7 A-7F) (coxa, trochanter and femur metallic green, tibia and tarsus metallic purple ( Fig.1 A-1F)); propygidium with longitudinal carinae in dorsal surface, distal margin with smooth surface and sparse setae in medial region ( Fig. 8 C-8D) (propygidium without longitudinal carinae in dorsal surface, distal margin with surface densely punctate, glabrous surface ( Fig. 2 C-2D)); labium with excavated area in dorsal surface of distal portion occupying more than 1/3 of disc surface, lateral margin rounded, palpomere III subfusiform and elongate, longer than palpomeres I–II combined ( Fig. 8 E-8F) (labium with excavated area in dorsal surface in the distal portion occupying less than 1/3 of disc surface, lateral margin substraight, palpomere III fusiform and elongated, length equal to palpomeres I–II combined ( Fig. 2 E-2F)); prosternum with dorsal surface densely striated transversely, space between striae less than width of one stria ( Fig.8 F-8G) (prosternum with dorsal surface densely striated transversely, space between striae bigger than width of one stria ( Fig. 2 F-2G)); prosternal process elongated, extending beyond distal margin of pro-trochanter ( Fig. 9A ) (prosternal process elongated, but not extending beyond distal margin of pro-trochanter ( Fig. 3A)); mesoventral process elongate, extending slightly beyond proximal margin of mesocoxa ( Fig. 1A ) (mesoventral process elongated, but not extending beyond proximal margin of mesocoxa ( Fig. 3A)); posterior angle of metacoxa with rounded apex, divergent, elongated, extending beyond lateroinner margin of metatrochanter ( Fig.9B ) (posterior angle of metacoxa straight, with rounded apex, elongated but not extending beyond lateroinner margin of metatrochanter ( Fig. 3B)); metatibia with distal margin of external surface strongly concave, concave distal surface ( Fig. 9 C-9D) (metatibia with distal margin of external surface weakly concave, flat distal surface ( Fig. 3 C-3D)); male abdominal ventrite VI with enlarged transversal carinae in dorsal surface, not extending to lateral margins of disc, membranous area in distal margin with length greater than 1/3 the length of anterior portion of disc, elongated setae only in lateral margin ( Fig.9E ) (narrow transversal carinae, extending to lateral margins of disc, membranous area with length equal to 1/3 the length of anterior portion of disc, elongated setae in lateral and distal margin ( Fig. 3E)); male metatarsomere V with protuberance laterally enlarged in inner margin, protuberance length slightly bigger than 1/3 of tarsomere length, outer metatarsal claw with excavated and enlarged area in inner margin ( Fig. 9F ) (protuberance laterally enlarged in inner margin, protuberance length slightly smaller than 1/3 of tarsomere length, outer metatarsal claw with strongly excavated and narrow area in inner margin ( Fig. 3F)); spiculum gastrale T-shaped, with straight lateral branches combined with a recurved medial branch, non-enlarged apex ( Fig. 10A ) (spiculum gastrale T-shaped, with straight lateral branches combined with a weakly recurved medial branch, slightly enlarged apex ( Fig. 4A )); parameres with variation, symmetrical, convex in dorsal view ( Fig. 10 B-10C-10E), proximal margin convex ( Fig. 10 C-10E), distal margin rounded ( Fig.10 B-10C-10E), inner margin with concave area in the proximal dorsal surface, substraigth medial region and touching apexes ( Fig. 10 B-10C) or with medial region divergent and free apexes ( Fig. 10E ), outer margin without lateral enlarged area between basal and medial region (Fi. 10C-10D), excavated area absent at base of dorsal surface ( Fig. 10 C-10E), laterally arched ( Fig. 10 E-10F-10I), short lateral carinae ( Fig. 10 B-10F-10I) and excavated area present at base ( Fig. 10 F-10H) excavated area can be more ( Fig.10 G-10H) or slightly less deep ( Fig. 10I ) (parameres without pronounced variation, symmetrical, convex in dorsal view ( Fig. 4 B-4C), proximal margin strongly convex ( Fig. 4 C-4D), distal margin rounded ( Fig. 4 B-4C), inner margin with concave area in proximal dorsal surface and straight medial region and touching apexes ( Fig. 4C ), outer margin with lateral enlarged area between the basal and medial region ( Fig. 4 C-4D), excavated area present at the base of dorsal surface ( Fig. 4 C-4D), laterally arched ( Fig. 4 E-4F), elongated lateral carinae ( Fig. 4 B-4F-4G) and excavated area present at base ( Fig. 4 E-4G)). All specimens of P. ludovici were dissected to analyze the variation among the parameres. There was no variation in the external morphological characters of the body as recorded in the parameres. According to the set of characters presented here, we propose a revised status of Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus , as a valid species, and not as junior synonym of Pelidnota burmeisteri tricolor Burmeister.

Pelidnota ebenina ( Blanchard, 1842) ( Figs. 11 A-11C, 12A-12G, 13A-13D and 14A-14G)

Anomala ebenina Blanchard, 1842 : plate 11 [original description]. Odontognathus ebeninus (Blanchard) [new combination by

Blanchard (1851, p. 215)].

Strigidia ebenina (Blanchard) [new combination by Lacordaire (1856, p. 355)].

Odontognathus ebeninus (Blanchard) [revised combination by Harold (1869, p. 1221)].

Pelidnota (Ganonota) ebenina (Blanchard) [new combination and new subgeneric combination by Ohaus (1918, p. 26)].

Pelidnota (Strigidia) ebenina (Blanchard) [new subgeneric combination by Machatschke (1970, p. 157)].

Pelidnota (Odontognathus) ebenina (Blanchard) [new subgeneric combination by Hardy (1975, p. 4)].

Strigidia ebenina (Blanchard) [revised combination by Soula (2006, pp. 16-17)].

Pelidnota (Strigidia) ebenina (Blanchard) [revised combination and revised subgeneric combination by Özdikmen (2009, p. 145)].

Pelidnota ebenina (Blanchard) [removal of subgeneric classification by Soula (2009, p. 115)].

Type material: 1 female holotype (lacking head) of Pelidnota ebenina (Blanchard) at MNHN: “743 / 34. // MUSEUM PARIS / SANTA CRUZ / DE LA SIERRA / D’ORBIGNY / 1834 // A. ebenina / Blanch. / Santa Cruz ( Bolivien) / A. D’Orbigny // ANOMALA / EBENINA BLANCHARD / det. Jameson 2004 / HOLOTYPE ♀ // PELIDNOTA / EBENINA / (BLANCHARD) ♀ / det. M. E. Jameson 2004 // HOLOTYPE // MNHN / EC7093” ( Fig. 11D) .

Examined material: ARGENTINA: Jujuy, Prov. [Province], Parque Nacional Calilegua , 3km, NW of campground, S 23°44.149’ W 064°51.044’, 777m, 15.i.2008, Light trap. L.R.R. Faria Jr. Leg. (1 male) ( CERPE) ; Salta Province, S of Salta (50km), E of Coronel Moldes , 23.i.2009, Snížek leg. (2 females) ( RBINS, NHMW) . BOLIVIA: Santa Cruz dpt, Ñuflo de Chávez pr. 18.xi.-5.xii. 2011, Concepción-FCBC Alta Vista, 16°08.1’S, 61°56.1’W, 425m, at light, L. Sekerka & D. Windsor lgt. (1 female) ( MSPC) .

Distribution: ARGENTINA: Salta ( Soula, 2006; Moore et al., 2017), Jujuy (new record). BOLIVIA: Santa Cruz ( Blanchard, 1851; Ohaus, 1918, 1934; Blackwelder, 1944; Machatschke, 1972; Soula, 2006; Krajcik, 2008; Moore et al., 2017) ( Fig. 18 ).

Pelidnota gounellei ( Ohaus, 1908) rev. stat. ( Figs. 15 A-15G, 16A-16 D and 17A-17G)

Odontognathus gounellei Ohaus, 1908: 307 [original description].

Pelidnota (Ganonota) gounellei (Ohaus) [new combination and new subgeneric combination by Ohaus (1918, p. 26)].

Pelidnota (Strigidia) gounellei (Ohaus) [new subgeneric combination by Machatschke (1970, p. 157)].

Pelidnota (Odontognathus) gounellei (Ohaus) [new subgeneric combination by Hardy (1975, p. 4)].

Strigidia ebenina (Blanchard) [syn. by Soula (2006, p. 17)].

Pelidnota (Strigidia) gounellei (Ohaus) [revised subgeneric combination and revised species status by Özdikmen (2009, p. 145)].

Pelidnota ebenina (Blanchard) [revised synonymy by Moore et al. (2017, p. 192 )].

Type locality: BRAZIL: Bahia (San Antonio da Barra [= Condeúba ]) .

Examined material: BRASIL: Minas Gerais: Águas Vermelhas, 7 km ao Norte da Fazenda Faceira , 12-14.xii.2012, luz (13 males, 5 females) ; 15.xii.2012, E.J.Grossi & P.C.Grossi legs., luz (6 males, 3 females); same but, 16.xii.2012, E.J.Grossi, E.& P.C. Grossi, P.C. legs., luz (4 males, 4 females); Jissaras [Giçaras], área de Cerrado , 13.xii.2012 J.A. Rafael, G.A.R. Melo, E.J. Grossi, E. & P.C. Grossi, P.C. legs. (6 males CERPE) ; Berizal, Fazenda Veredão , 09-12.xii.2012, E.J.Grossi, E.& P.C.Grossi legs. (1 male) . Bahia: Encruzilhada , 11.xii. 2007, 800m, luz, 15°32’25”S 40°50’12”W, P.C. Grossi, J.A. Rafael & D.R. Parizotto legs. (1 male) ( CERPE) .

Distribution: BRAZIL: Pará ( Ohaus, 1908, 1918, 1934; Blackwelder, 1944; Machatschke, 1972; Soula, 2006; Krajcik, 2008; Moore et al., 2017), Bahia ( Ohaus, 1908, 1918, 1934; Blackwelder, 1944; Machatschke, 1972; Soula, 2006; Krajcik, 2008; Moore et al., 2017; present study), Minas Gerais (new state record) ( Fig. 18 ).

Remarks: Pelidnota gounellei was described by Ohaus (1908) based on a unique male specimen collected in the state of Bahia (San Antonio da Barra) [Santo Antônio da Barra is an old District,that currently belongs to the municipality of Condeúba,in southwest of Bahia] (IBGE,2022 – Available at: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ba/condeuba/historico).In the original description of the species, Ohaus (1908) comparedP. gounellei withP. cuprea fulvipennis (Germar,1824) (according to him,this species has a very variable shape) and suggested that P. gounellei is a western Brazilian variety of P. cuprea fulvipennis. Recently, Soula (2006) synonymized P. gounellei ( Figs. 15 A-15G, 16A-16D and 17A-17G) with P.ebenina ( Blanchard, 1842) ( Figs.11 A-11C,12A-12G, 13A-13D and 14A-14G) and described this species based on a single female specimen from Santa Cruz de la Sierra ( Bolivia). Moore et al. (2017), considered both species very similar based on outer appearance only,without presenting comparative characters.Furthermore, Moore et al. (2017) pointed out the differences on type localities of both species ( P. ebenina from the western slopes of the Andes in Bolivia and Argentina; P. gounellei from Bahia and Minas Gerais in eastern Brazil). Moreover, Moore et al. (2017) stated that the type specimens associated with these three names ( P.ebenina , P.gounellei , andP. cuprea fulvipennis) will assist in clarifying the validity of these species. However, Moore et al. (2017) followed Soula (2006) and considered Pelidnota gounellei as a revised synonymy of Pelidnota ebenina .

Here, we present a set of new characters, based on a series of P. gounellei ( Figs 15 A-15G, 16A-16D and 17A-17G) specimens followed by the characters in brackets referring to P. ebenina ( Figs. 11 A-11C, 12A-12G, 13A-13D and 14A-14G) examined in our study: dorsal ( Fig. 15A), lateral ( Fig. 15B) and ventral sides ( Fig. 15C) brownish black (dorsal ( Figs. 11A and 12A ), lateral ( Figs. 11C and 12B ) and ventral sides ( Figs. 11B and 12C ) black); legs brownish black ( Fig.15 A-15C) (black ( Figs.11 A-11C and 12A-12C)); pygidium brownish black ( Fig. 15E) (black ( Fig. 12E )); labium with inverted “V” shaped carinae in dorsal surface of distal portion extending from base of the labial palp insertion to distal margin of disc, insertion area of labial palp more excavated, palpomere III fusiform and elongated, equal to palpomeres I–II combined, concave distal margin and rounded lateral margin ( Fig. 15 F-15G) (labium without carinae on dorsal surface of distal portion, insertion area of labial palp less excavated, palpomere III fusiform and elongated, longer than palpomeres I–II combined, distal margin weakly concave and slightly rounded lateral margin ( Fig.12 F-12G)); mesoventral process elongated, not extending beyond the proximal margin of mesocoxa ( Fig. 16A ) (mesoventral process elongated extending slightly beyond proximal margin of mesocoxa ( Fig. 13A )); posterior angle of metacoxa with rounded apex, divergent, elongated, extending beyond lateroinner margin of metatrochanter ( Fig. 16B ) (posterior angle of metacoxa straight, with rounded apex, elongated extending beyond lateroinner margin of metatrochanter ( Fig. 13B )); metatrochanter elongated, apex exceeding distal margin of metafemur slightly ( Fig. 16B ) (apex exceeding distal margin of metafemur ( Fig.13B )); metatibia with distal margin of external surface strongly concave in the area of insertion of trochanter ( Fig.16 C-16D) (metatibia with distal margin of external surface concave ( Fig. 13 C-13D)); male abdominal ventrite I with smooth surface ( Fig. 15B) (surface moderately striated transversely ( Fig. 12B ); male abdominal ventrite VI with transversal carinae in dorsal surface, membranous area in distal margin with length subequal to length of anterior portion of disc ( Fig. 17A ) (carinae not evident, membranous area with length less than length of anteriorportion of disc ( Fig. 14A )); male metatarsomere V with protuberance absent in inner margin, outer metatarsal claw with length less than length of metatarsomere ( Fig. 17B ) (male metatarsomere V with protuberance weakly present in inner margin, outer metatarsal claw with length subequal to length of metatarsomere ( Fig. 14B )); spiculum gastrale T-shaped, with straight lateral branches combined with straight medial branch, slightly enlarged apex ( Fig. 17C ) (spiculum gastrale T-shaped, with straight lateral branches combined with a weakly curved medial branch, slightly enlarged apex ( Fig. 14C )); parameres symmetrical, fused only at base, enlarged basal region without carinae in surface, narrow medial region and apical region spatuliform, sinuous proximal margin, concave lateral margin and subelliptical inner margin in dorsal view ( Fig. 17 D-17E), in lateral view ( Fig.17 F-17G) irregular surface with laterobasal and dorsal margins sinuous, lateroventral margin almost straight and acute apex ( Fig. 17 F-17G) (parameres symmetrical, fused only at base, enlarged basal region with a transversal carinae in surface of medial portion, narrow medial and apical region, acute and dorsally produced apex, sinuous proximal margin, straight lateral margin and sub diamond-shaped inner margin in dorsal view ( Fig. 14 D-14E), in lateral view ( Fig. 14 F-14G) irregular surface with sinuous laterobasal and dorsal margins, almost straight lateroventral margin and hammershaped apex ( Fig. 14 F-14G)). According to the set of characters presented here, and following Özdikmen (2009), we propose the revised status of Pelidnota gounellei (Ohaus) , as a valid species, different from Pelidnota ebenina (Blanchard) .

Figures

Figure 1 Pelidnota burmeisteri burmeisteri Burmeister,1844:A-C, male (dorsal,lateral, ventral); D-F, female (dorsal, lateral, ventral).

Figure 2 Pelidnota burmeisteri burmeisteri Burmeister, 1844: A, male head (dorsal); B, female head (dorsal); C, pygidium (frontal); D, male pygidium in detail (frontal); E, male labium (dorsal); F, male mouthparts and prosternum (dorsal); G, prosternum in detail (dorsal).

Figure 4 Pelidnota burmeisteri burmeisteri Burmeister, 1844: A, spiculum gastrale (dorsal); B-G, parameres; B, lateral carinae in detail (frontal); C-D, excavated aerea in surface and enlarged lateral area in lateral margin in detail (dorsal);E, aedeagus (lateral); F-G, lateral carinae and excavated aerea in lateral surface in detail.

Figure 6 Holotype ofPelidnotaludovici Ohaus,1905:A-C, male (dorsal,lateral,ventral); D male pygidium in detail (frontal);E, type labels;F-G, excavated aerea in surface and enlarged lateral area in lateral margin indetail (dorsal);H, aedeagus (lateral);I-J, lateral carinae and excavated aerea in lateral surface in detail.

Figure 9 Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus,1905:A, male prosternal and mesoventral processes (dorsal); B, male posterior angle of metacoxa in detail (dorsal);C, male metatibia (lateral); D, apex of metatibia in detail (lateral);E, male abdominal ventrite VI (dorsal); F, male metarsomere V and outer metatarsal claw (lateral).

Figure 10 Pelidnota ludovici Ohaus,1905:A, spiculum gastrale (dorsal);B-G, parameres; B, lateral carinae in detail (frontal);C-D, basal region of dorsal surface in detail;E, morphological variation of the parameres, inner margin divergent and free apex (frontal); F, aedeagus (lateral);G-I, lateral carinae and excavated aerea in lateral surface in detail.

Figure 12 Pelidnota ebenina (Blanchard, 1842): A-C, male (dorsal, lateral, ventral); D, male head (dorsal); E, male pygidium (frontal); F, male mouthparts (frontal); G, male labium (dorsal).

Figure 13 Pelidnota ebenina (Blanchard, 1842): A, male mesoventral process (dorsal); B, male posterior angle of metacoxa,metatrochanter and abdominal ventrite I in detail (dorsal); C, male metatibia (lateral); D, apex of metatibia in detail (lateral).

Figure 14 Pelidnota ebenina (Blanchard,1842): A, male abdominal ventriteVI (dorsal); B, metatarsomere V and outer tarsal claw (lateral); C, spiculum gastrale (dorsal);D-G, parameres; D-E, dorsal; E, transversal carinae in basal surface and acute and dorsally produced apex in detail; F, aedeagus (lateral); G, hammer-shaped apex in detail.

Figure 16 Pelidnota gounellei (Ohaus, 1908): A, male mesoventral process (dorsal);B, male posterior angle of metacoxa, metatrochanter and abdominal ventrite I in detail (dorsal); C, male metatibia (lateral); D, apex of metatibia in detail (lateral).

Figure 17 Pelidnota gounellei (Ohaus, 1908): male abdominal ventrite VI (dorsal); B, metatarsomere V and outer tarsal claw (lateral); C, spiculum gastrale (dorsal); D-G, parameres; D-E, dorsal; E, apex in detail; F, aedeagus (lateral); G, apex in detail.

Figure 18 Distribution records for four species of Pelidnota.