Psilopterus lemoinei (Moreno & Mercerat, 1891)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S0031-10492003000400001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D18A23-C858-1842-5BB6-2E7297B0FD5D |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Psilopterus lemoinei (Moreno & Mercerat, 1891) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Psilopterus lemoinei (Moreno & Mercerat, 1891)
comb. n.
Patagornis lemoinei Moreno & Mercerat, 1891 (pp. 23 and 58).
Psilopterus australis Moreno & Mercerat, 1891 (pp. 26 and 68); Brodkorb, 1967.
Pelecyornis tubulatus Ameghino, 1895 ; Brodkorb, 1967 (syn. of Psilopterus australis ).
Phororhacos modicus Ameghino, 1895; syn.n.
Staphylornis gallardoi Mercerat, 1897 ; Brodkorb, 1967 (syn.? of Psilopterus australis ).
Staphylornis erythacus Mercerat, 1897 ; Brodkorb, 1967 (syn.? of Psilopterus australis ).
Pelecyornis tenuirostris Sinclair & Farr, 1932 ; Brodkorb, 1967 (syn. of Psilopterus australis ).
Lectotype – (by present designation): Distal end of a right tibiotarsus (MLP-162).
Hypodigm – Besides the lectotype and the material that served as type for the diverse synonyms, a plentiful and splendid material is discribed and pictured by Sinclair & Farr (1932). An ungual phalanx (MLP-164), described and pictured by Moreno & Mercerat (1891) as belonging to this species, certainly belongs to Patagornis marshi .
Horizon and Locality – Middle Miocene (Santacrucian) of Argentina, Santa Cruz Province: Santa Cruz, Killik Aike, Monte Observación, Take Harvey, La Cueva, Corriguen Kaik, Tagua Quemada .
Diagnos i s Revised – Larger-sized than P. bachmanni ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ), with the skull and upper maxilla notably higher ( Figs. 26F, 26H and 26I View FIGURE 26 ), and a less slanted rostral edge of the antorbital fenestra. Other differences in the diverse segments of the skeleton are described and pictured by Sinclair & Farr (1932).
Measurements – Table 8 and Sinclair & Farr (1932).
8. Measurements of the Psilopterinae (mm). Numbers in brackets are estimates based on incomplete bones.
Illustrations – Sinclair & Farr (1932).
Remarks – One of the best represented Phorusrhacidae by the relative abundance of fossils. Some observed discrepancies, especially in the skulls ( Figs. 26F, 26G, 26H and 26I View FIGURE 26 ), should be attributed to differences in age or sex. Psilopterus lemoinei and P. bachmanni are herein dealt with as being two very similar species that appear to have lived together, disputing very similar niches. The most important difference between the two is in the size and proportions of the upper maxilla, and the differences in slant of the rostral edge of the antorbital fenestra. A deeper study might lead to different conclusions, as to the number of species of the genus Psilopterus from the Santacruzian of Argentina, as was discussed before under the sub-title: “intra-specific variations”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.