Hydrophilomyces hamatus T.Majewski

Santamaria, Sergi & Pedersen, Jan, 2021, Laboulbeniomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota) of Denmark, European Journal of Taxonomy 781, pp. 1-425 : 51-52

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.781.1583

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5829030

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D3878A-B763-FFD7-677B-78F1DE5AFCCB

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hydrophilomyces hamatus T.Majewski
status

 

Hydrophilomyces hamatus T.Majewski View in CoL

MB#315333

Fig. 7F–G View Fig

Acta Mycologica 10: 274 ( Majewski 1974). –

Type: “ On Cercyon bifenestratus Küst. (Col., Hydrophilidae ): Pomiechówek, Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki county, in mud on the left bank of the River Wkra , 13.6.1973 leg. T. Majewski ( TM. 1301 – holotype)”; KRAM. [ Poland]

Diagnostic features

Receptacle stout, consisting of up to 22 flattened cells. Buffer cells present ( Fig. 7F–G View Fig , bf). Perithecial neck bent. [Detailed description: Majewski 1994b]

Distribution and hosts

On Cercyon (Col. Hydrophilidae ) from Poland (type), United Kingdom ( Weir & Beakes 1993), Sierra Leone ( Rossi 1990), and maybe from Belgium ( De Kesel et al. 2020).

Collections examined from Denmark

On Cercyon littoralis (Gyllenhal, 1808) (Col. Hydrophilidae )

DENMARK – Lolland, Falster, Møn (LFM) • Tjørnebjerg ved Kramnitse ; 54°41.586′ N, 11°16.980′ E; PF46; 19 May 2019; JP 1463; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-124042 , C-F-124043 GoogleMaps .

Remarks

First record from Denmark. According to Majewski (1974), Hydrophilomyces hamatus is distinguished from H. gracilis by the presence of buffer cells, by the strongly recurved neck of the perithecium (although only seen on overmature perithecia), and by the stout receptacle, with less cells. Hydrophilomyces hamatus grows on the ventral side of the thorax or between coxae and the base of legs, whereas H. gracilis grows on the elytral apices. Majewski (1994b) considers the possibility that both species might be “growth forms of the same species”.

These species may exist on the same host specimen and their position is not related to host sex as is the case for example with H. coneglianensis and its synonym H. elegans . For this reason we prefer to maintain both species separate.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF