Stolas indigacea arrogans ( Spaeth, 1923 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-75.1.191 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D387F5-FFA4-FF9F-FD57-FE17FE17FE7B |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Stolas indigacea arrogans ( Spaeth, 1923 ) |
status |
|
Stolas indigacea arrogans ( Spaeth, 1923) ( Figs. 43–52 View Figs View Figs )
Pseudomesomphalia indigacea subsp. arrogans Spaeth 1923: 175 .
Type Localities. Argentina: Salta, Tucuman, Catamarca .
Type Specimens Examined. Syntypes: male, pinned, “Coll. E. Ross | Berlin. N 113 [b, t, cb] || COTYPUS [r, t, cb] || Tucuman [w, hw, cb] || arrogans [hw] | Spaeth det. [w, t, cb] || 26 [w, hw, s] || ZMH 823529 [w, bf, sf]” ( ZMH) ( Figs. 43–44 View Figs ); female, pinned, “Coll. E. Ross | Berlin. N 113 [b, t, cb] || Tucuman [hw, w, cb] || Pseudomesomphal. | indigacea subsp. | Spaeth determ. || arrogans m | nov subsp. | cotyp. [hw, w, cb] || Argentinien | coll. Ross, Berlin [g, t, cb] || Pseudomes. | indigacea | 38.) Boh. Bolivia [g, hw, bf, cb] || ZMH 824679 [w, bf, sf]” ( ZMH) ( Figs. 45–46 View Figs ); male, pinned, “Coll. E. Ross | Berlin. N 113 [b, t, cb] || Tucuman [hw, w, cb] || Pseudomesomphal. | v. arrogans m. n. subsp. | Spaeth determ. [t & hw, w, cb] || ZMH 824680 [w, bf, sf]” ( ZMH) ( Figs. 47–48 View Figs ); male, pinned, “Coll. E. Ross | Berlin. N 113 [b, t, cb] || Tucuman [hw, w, cb] || Pseudomesomphal. [w, p, cb] || indig. v. arrogans m. | Spaeth determ. [t & hw, w, cb] || Argentinien | coll. Ross, Berlin [g, t, cb] || ZMH 824682 [w, bf, sf]” ( ZMH) ( Figs. 49–50 View Figs ); female, pinned, “Coll. E. Ross | Berlin. N 113 [b, t, cb] || Tucuman [hw, w, cb] || Argentinien | coll. Ross, Berlin [g, t, cb] || Pseudomesomphal. | arrogans m. n. subsp. | Spaeth determ. [t & hw, w, cb] || Pseudomes. | arrogans | 33 Spaeth | Argentinien [g, hw, bf, cb] || ZMH 824683 [w, bf, sf]” ( ZMH) ( Figs. 51–52 View Figs ).
Current Status. Synonym of Stolas indigacea ( Boheman, 1850) .
Remarks. Spaeth (1923) based the description of this taxon on numerous specimens from various localities in Argentina, but did not select one as the holotype; therefore, all must be considered syntypes.
Borowiec (1999) did not recognize any taxa of subspecific rank as valid and considered them synonyms of their nominal species. Since that time, S. arrogans has been treated as a synonym of S. indigacea . We have studied the types of both taxa, and they are quite distinct. However, they belong to the complicated Stolas festiva (Klug, 1829) species- group, which displays great polymorphism with many local forms. The group needs a complete revision.
Until now, this nominal taxon was considered to have been published in 1922, as the description was in the fourth issue of Volume 1 of Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskrift in 1922. However, this issue was published no sooner than 24 June 1923. Hence, the year is changed accordingly.
ZMH |
Zoologisches Museum Hamburg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stolas indigacea arrogans ( Spaeth, 1923 )
Simões, Marianna V. P., Husemann, Martin & Sekerka, Lukáš 2021 |
Pseudomesomphalia indigacea subsp. arrogans
Spaeth, F. 1923: 175 |