Rhaphidophora hexagoniproctalis Wang, Di & He, 2024

Di, Mi, Qin, Yan-Yan, Shen, Zi-Hao, Zhang, Tao, Wang, Han-Qiang, Li, Kai & He, Zhu-Qing, 2024, Six new species of Rhaphidophora from China (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae: Rhaphidophorinae), European Journal of Taxonomy 925 (1), pp. 76-99 : 78-80

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.925.2453

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98C16EE9-4ED7-4A26-AC94-7A4F4C25A771

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10809002

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/107262A5-AF65-4CC8-8561-B3AAD573A6CE

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:107262A5-AF65-4CC8-8561-B3AAD573A6CE

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rhaphidophora hexagoniproctalis Wang, Di & He
status

sp. nov.

Rhaphidophora hexagoniproctalis Wang, Di & He sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:107262A5-AF65-4CC8-8561-B3AAD573A6CE

Fig. 1 View Fig

Chinese name

六¶板kõ

Diagnosis

This new species is similar to R. spinifera Gorochov, 2013 and R. complanatis , but especially to R. digitata and R. shii . It differs from R. spinifera by the main part of the epiproct compacted ( Fig. 1D View Fig ) instead of elongated; from R. complanatis by digitate processes of the male epiproct cylindrical and shorter ( Fig. 1D–E View Fig ); from R. digitata and R. shii by the distance between the processes of the male epiproct which is significantly longer than the length of the process ( Fig. 1D View Fig ), while in the other species it is nearly equal.

Etymology

The new specific epithet is derived from ‘epiproct’ and the Latinised Greek prefix ‘ hexagoni ’ due to the shape of the main part of the male epiproct in dorsal view.

Material examined

Holotype

CHINA • ♂; Yunnan Prov., Nabanhe Reserve , television tower ; alt. 1900 m; 30 Jul. 2005; Li-Zhen Li and Jin-Wen Li leg.; SEM CAS 14098450 View Materials .

Description

Male

BODY SIZE. Small.

HEAD. Fastigium of vertex divided into pair of plate-like processes by longitudinal furrow ( Fig. 1B View Fig ). Eyes protruding outward, reniform, situated at upper part of external margin of antennal sockets ( Fig. 1A View Fig ); lateral ocelli almost occupying nearly three quarters of lateral margins of whole tubercles, suborbicular, situated at lateral base of tubercles ( Fig. 1B View Fig ); median ocellus situated between two antennal sockets, oval ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Maxillary palpi stout, apical segment longer than subapical one, apex inflated, almost spherical.

THORAX. Anterior and posterior margin of pronotum slightly convex ( Fig. 1B View Fig ); lateral lobes with ventral margins arched, posterior margins slightly concave ( Fig. 1C View Fig ); posterior margin of mesonotum slightly convex, posterior margin of lateral lobes slightly concave, arched ( Fig. 1C View Fig ); posterior margin of metanotum straight ( Fig. 1C View Fig ).

LEGS. Fore femur with 1 apical spine on internal genicular lobe ( Fig. 1B View Fig ); fore tibia ventrally with 1 internal spine, 2 external spines and 1 pair of apical spines. Middle femur with 1 apical spine on internal and external genicular lobe separately; middle tibia dorsally with 2 pairs of spines and 1 pair of apical spines, ventrally with 2 external spines and 1 pair of apical spines. Hind femur ventrally unarmed, inner genicular lobe with spinule; hind tibia dorsally with 17–18 spinules on both sides, subapical area dorsally with 1 pair of spines, apex with 1 pair of larger mediate spines and 1 pair of smaller ventral spines asymmetrically (always inner one longer), dorsal pair, which is largest one, is missing in the sole specimen ( Fig. 1G–H View Fig ) and seen as pair of circular pits. Hind tarsus laterally compressed, basitarsus dorsally with 5 spinules and 1 terminal spine exceeding ventral edge ( Fig. 1G View Fig ).

ABDOMEN. Abdominal tergite without distinct projection. Posterior margin of tenth abdominal tergite concave. Epiproct roughly hexagonal, with pair of digitative processes ( Fig. 1D View Fig ) in posterolateral corners, and with rather long lobe located between these processes and directed downwards/anteriorly as well as having bispinous apex (maybe due to shrinkage of dry specimen, Fig. 1E–F View Fig ). Subgenital plate damaged, repaired structure as in Fig. 1H. View Fig

COLORATION. Body dark brown with yellowish spots, ventral surface brown, external surface of hind femora with stripes.

Female

Unknown.

Measurements (mm)

BL: ♂ 12.0; PL: ♂ 5.2; FFL: ♂ 6.0; HFL: ♂ 14.5; HTL: ♂ 12.5; HBL: ♂ 3.2.

Distribution

China (Yunnan).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF