Rhaphidophora impressa Wang, Qin & He, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.925.2453 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98C16EE9-4ED7-4A26-AC94-7A4F4C25A771 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10809012 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B38A9455-48AE-4366-8224-D53E4FE774BE |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:B38A9455-48AE-4366-8224-D53E4FE774BE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhaphidophora impressa Wang, Qin & He |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhaphidophora impressa Wang, Qin & He sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B38A9455-48AE-4366-8224-D53E4FE774BE
Figs 6–8 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Chinese name
圆Ḥkõ
Diagnosis
The new species is similar to those species bearing a simple male epiproct. It differs from the previous species by the apex of the male epiproct only plump without being vertically expanded ( Fig. 8B View Fig ), and bears a circular imprint at the bottom of the epiproctal concavity ( Fig. 8A View Fig ); from R. setiformis Qin, Jiang, Liu & Li, 2018 by the apex of the male epiproct swell not depressed ( Figs 8B View Fig , 9A View Fig ), the concavity of the male epiproct being not narrow and prolonged from base to apex; and from R. duxiu in the shape of the male epiproctal concavity and the length of the female subgenital plate.
Etymology
The new specific epithet is derived from the Latin ‘ imprimo ’ and stands for the circular imprint of the epiproctal concavity in the male.
Material examined
Holotype
CHINA • ♂; Hunan Prov., Yueyang, Pingjiang, Fushoushan National Forest Park ; alt. 1079 m; 18 Sep. 2016; Ri-Xin Jiang, Ji-Bao Jiang, Sheng-Nan Liu and De-Yao Zhou leg.; SEM CAS 14098455 About CAS .
Paratypes
CHINA • 1 ♂; same locality as for holotype; alt. 1070–1270 m; 15 Sep. 2018; Yan-Yan Qin and Sai-Nan Zhang leg; SEM CAS 14098453 About CAS • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; SEM CAS 14098454 About CAS .
Description
Male
BODY SIZE. Medium to small.
HEAD. Fastigium of vertex divided into pair of plate-like processes by longitudinal furrow ( Fig. 6B View Fig ). Eyes protruding outward, reniform, situated near upper part of external margin of antennal sockets ( Fig. 6A View Fig ); lateral ocelli situated at lateral base of rostral tubercles, suborbicular, nearly occupying three fourths of lateral margin of rostral tubercles ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); median ocellus situated between antennal sockets, oval ( Fig. 6A View Fig ). Maxillary palpi strong, apical segment longer than subapical segment, apex inflated, almost spherical.
THORAX. Anterior margin of pronotum straight, posterior margin convex ( Fig. 6B View Fig ), posterior part of ventral margin of lateral lobes arched, posterior margin emarginate ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); Posterior margin of mesotergum slightly projected, posterior part of ventral margin of lateral lobes emarginate, arched; posterior margin of metanotum straight ( Fig. 6C View Fig ).
LEGS. Fore coxa inflated, dorsally with 1 spinule; fore femur with 1 apical spine on internal genicular lobe ( Fig. 6B View Fig ); ventral surface of fore tibia with 2 external and 1 internal spine, apex with 1 pair of spines on ventral surface. Anterior margin of middle coxa dorsally with 1 pair of spiniform processes; mid femur with 1 apical spine on internal and external genicular lobe separately; mid tibia dorsally with 1 pair of spines and 1 pair of apical spines, ventrally with 2 pairs of external spines and 1 pair of apical spines. Hind femur ventrally unarmed, with 1 spinule on internal genicular lobe; hind tibia dorsally with 17–18 spinules on both dorsal margins, subapical area dorsally with 1 pair of spines, apex with 1 pair of dorsal long spines and 2 pairs of shorter ventral spines asymmetrically, the largest apical spine slightly surpassing tip of terminal basitarsal spine ( Fig. 6G View Fig ); hind tarsus laterally compressed, basitarsus with 2 spinules and a terminal spine on dorsal surface, dorsal tip longer than ventral edge ( Fig. 6G View Fig ).
ABDOMEN. Abdominal tergite without processes, posterior margin of tenth abdominal tergite emarginate ( Fig. 6D View Fig ). Epiproct similar to that of previous species but with basal portion trapezoidal, more distal portion elongately triangular, concavity between dorsolateral carinae drop-shaped, base of concavity widened and expanding to middle forming circular imprint, apex of concavity constricted and narrowing to epiproctal end ( Figs 6D View Fig , 8A View Fig ). Subgenital plate roughly semicircular, sub apex with pair of stout styli with apex enlarged ( Fig. 6E–F View Fig ). Cerci elongated, basal part wider than apical part, nearly conical, apex obtuse ( Fig. 6E View Fig ).
Female
Similar to male. Hind basitarsus with 4–5 spinules and a terminal spine on dorsal surface. Subgenital plate transverse and short, near semicircular, hind margin pointed in middle ( Figs 7A View Fig , 8C View Fig ). Ovipositor longer than half length of hind femora, narrower from base to apex gradually, evenly upcurved, ventral margin serrated near apex ( Fig. 7B View Fig ).
COLORATION. Body reddish brown in thoracic tergites and dark brown with yellowish patches in rest part; face pale brown, eyes darkish, ocelli pale. Legs tawny, external surface of hind femora with oblique darkish stripes and pale patches.
Measurements (mm)
BL: ♂ 13.0–15.0, ♀ 14.0; PL: ♂ 5.5–6.2, ♀ 5.7; FFL: ♂ 5.5–6.5, ♀ 5.4; HFL: ♂ 14.0–14.5, ♀ 15.0; HTL: ♂ 12.0–13.5, ♀ 13.8; HBL: ♂ 3.0–3.2, ♀ 3.5; OvL: ♀ 8.0.
Distribution
China (Hunan).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |