Dacus (Neodacus) perpusillus Drew, 1971
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7300862 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A105F057-F2A4-4C14-B82E-14912B319D57 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7301280 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D4F455-00AB-43B6-41BE-C987297D39C1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dacus (Neodacus) perpusillus Drew, 1971 |
status |
|
Dacus (Neodacus) perpusillus Drew, 1971 View in CoL , restored combination
Figure 91 View Figure 91
Distribution. New Caledonia (mainland, Maré, Lifou).
Male lure. Cue-lure.
Host plants. No known host.
Biology. Monthly trapping data illustrated on Figure 135 View Figure 135 .
Notes. This species was originally described as Dacus (Asiadacus) perpusillus Drew, 1971 and later reassigned as Bactrocera (Sinodacus) perpusilla (Drew) by Drew (1989). More recently, it was transferred to genus Zeugodacus , as Z. (Sinodacus) perpusillus (Drew) (DeMeyer et al. 2015; Doorenweerd et al. 2018) or treated as Bactrocera (Parasinodacus) perpusilla (Drew) by Hancock and Drew (2017b). A close morphological examination of fresh specimens collected by the author in New Caledonia in 2019 clearly shows that this species belongs to genus Dacus and subgenus Neodacus , as defined by Drew and Romig (2013, 2022), further confirmed by genetic data ( Doorenweerd et al. 2020). I am therefore reassigning this species as Dacus (Neodacus) perpusillus Drew.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |