Clathrina sagamiana (Hozawa, 1929)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.0024-4082.2003.00063.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D5484C-D439-C37B-FC39-FB2CFC38FB72 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Clathrina sagamiana |
status |
|
CLATHRINA SAGAMIANA ( HÔZAWA, 1929)
Original name: Leucosolenia sagamiana Hôzawa, 1929
Type locality: Odawara , Sagami Sea, Japan .
Type: Tokyo Sci. Fac. Spec. N ∞. 39. (holotype /alcohol). Front of Omeit water, Odawara , 120 Hine. Sagami Sea, Japan, 171 m depth. By hand with bamboo gear by Ijima (1 August 1895) .
Citations: Tanita (1942, 1943); Burton (1963).
Colour: Preserved holotype is white.
Description: The holotype is completely fragmented, but some of the fragments are still attached to the Alcyonaria mentioned in the original description by Hôzawa. According to Hôzawa, the largest individual was provided with a terminal osculum. However, it is no longer possible to recognize the organization of the cormus ( Fig. 30A View Figure 30 ).
The skeleton comprises two populations of equiangular and equiradiate tetractines ( Fig. 30B View Figure 30 ), but there are also sagittal tetractines. Triactines are rare. Diactines are also present ( Fig. 30B View Figure 30 ). Actines are conical, straight and sharp. The apical actine of the tetractines is conical, smooth and has almost the same length as the facial actines. Diactines are fusiform and slightly curved. They are projected through the surface of the tubes.
Remarks: According to the original description, the holotype was attached to a branch of Alcyonaria, as we confirmed. The size of the spicules in the original description was:
Although Hôzawa had not discriminated between the two populations of tetractines, he mentioned in his original description that the ‘dermal (tetractines) are usually slightly larger than the deep ones’.
C. sagamiana differs from C. reticulum in the size of its spicules (which are shorter in C. reticulum ), in the shape of the diactines, which are not arrow-shaped in C. sagamiana , and in the shape of the actines of the triactines and tetractines, which is cylindrical in C. reticulum and conical in C. sagamiana , and also by the presence of a second population of tetractines in C. sagamiana .
The differences between C. sagamiana and C. contorta are mainly in the shape of the apical actine of the tetractines, which is conical in C. sagamiana and cylindrical in C. contorta , as well as in C. reticulum . In relation to C. laxa , the absence of the large tetractines, the diameter of the apical actine and of the tetractines, and the length of the actines of the tetractines are enough to differentiate it from C. sagamiana .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.