Machairocentron amahuaca, Vilarino & Salles & Bispo, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2051 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C6F8E502-3898-44A6-968A-F302C8521F9D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7689551 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4241D080-8E08-4428-8F3D-8ECA3877F54C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:4241D080-8E08-4428-8F3D-8ECA3877F54C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Machairocentron amahuaca |
status |
sp. nov. |
Machairocentron amahuaca sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4241D080-8E08-4428-8F3D-8ECA3877F54C
Figs 1 View Fig , 2A View Fig , 3A View Fig , 4 View Fig
Machairocentron morphotype C Vilarino & Holzenthal, 2020: 31, fig. 18.
Diagnosis
Machairocentron amahuaca sp. nov. is similar to Machairocentron echinatum ( Flint, 1981) by the inferior appendage having a very elongated apical region, not enlarged apically, and having a single row of setae. It can be distinguished by: a) the mesal projection of the inferior appendage has shorter spines ( Fig. 4B View Fig ) and b) the ventral margin of the mesal projection forms a sharp right angle in lateral view ( Fig. 4A View Fig ), whereas it is rounded in other species.
Etymology
Named after the Amahuaca, an indigenous people whose language belongs to the Pano linguistic family. The name of the Amahuaca or “ amin waka ” has been translated as “children of the capybara”, an animal that is said to be able to “sing” in the native language of this people.
Material examined
Holotype PERU • ♂; 19 rd km W of Cusco, Quincemil, Rio Araza tributary; 13°20′10.0″ S, 70°50′57.00″ W; elev. 874 m; 23–31 Aug. 2012; R.R. Cavichioli, J.A. Rafael, A.P.M. Santos and D.M. Takiya leg.; Malaise trap; MUSM-ENT-0320559 GoogleMaps .
Paratypes
PERU • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; MUSM-ENT-0320560–0320561 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; DZRJ 8650–8651 GoogleMaps .
Description of male
BODY ( Figs 2A View Fig , 3A View Fig ). Forewing length 3.8– 2.9 mm (n =5). Color overall dark brown with pale legs (in alcohol) ( Fig. 2A View Fig ). Maxillary palp segment length formula (I =II =III) <IV<V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Venation: forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell about as long as thyridial cell. Hindwing forks II and V present. Sternum V with mammiliform reticulated projection ( Fig. 3A View Fig ).
GENITALIA ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). Tergum IX, in lateral view, narrow ( Fig. 4A View Fig ); in dorsal view, anterior margin with deep, wide concave incision, U-shaped; posterior margin tapered, divided apicomesally by narrow incision about ¼ its length; apex of tergite rounded lobe ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Sternum IX, in lateral view, about 1.5× as long as high; anterior apodeme short, narrow, curved ventrad; apex deltoid ( Fig. 4A View Fig ); in ventral view, anterior margin strongly concave; posterior margin widely concave with very small mesal lobe ( Fig. 4C View Fig ). Paraproct, in lateral view, oblong, apex rounded ( Fig. 4A View Fig ); in dorsal view, each side unfused, with two pairs of setae at mid length ( Fig. 4B View Fig ); wide basally, tapering apically; divided apicomesally, with numerous sensillae on apex ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Preanal appendage about 3.5× as long as tergum IX, densely setose; in lateral view, wide, straight on basal ⅓, slightly curved ventrad on apical ⅓, tapering apically; in dorsal view, about same width throughout length, apex curved mesad ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Inferior appendage longer than preanal appendage; bi-segmented, with dorsal and ventral incision between them ( Fig. 4A– B View Fig ). Coxopodite shorter than harpago, with long setae ventrally ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). Harpago basal region short, sclerotized; in lateral view, narrow and oblong dorsally, wide ventrally, posteroventral margin forming sharp right angle; apical region slender, digitate, more than 4× length of basal region, bearing row of setae on mesal margin from base to apex ( Fig. 4A View Fig ); in ventral view, with lateral and mesal projections; lateral projection rounded, covered with small spines, with anterior margin straight and lateral margin crenulate; mesal projection oblong, mesal margin forming narrow flap, which circumscribes spiny concavity, apex rounded, densely covered with small spines ( Fig. 4C View Fig ). Phallus tubular, very long and slender, reaching segment V; basally conical, weakly sclerotized; in dorsal view, apex slightly enlarged, with mesal incision ( Fig. 4D View Fig ).
Remarks
The new species is described from the South Brazilian dominion, Yungas Province, and is most similar to M. echinatum , known from the Pacific dominion. This group of species is particularly recognizable by the deep concavities on the anterior and posterior margins of tergum IX. Machairocentron amahuaca sp. nov. corresponds to the “morphotype C” of Vilarino & Holzenthal (2020), defined on one damage specimen. Thus, more specimens were analyzed, confirming the consistency of the characters and the distinctiveness of the species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |