Solenoptera tomentosa Lingafelter, 2015

Devesa, Sergio, Fonseca, Elier & Barro, Alejandro, 2017, Description of the female of Solenoptera tomentosa Lingafelter, 2015 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Prioninae: Solenopterini), Insecta Mundi 2017 (588), pp. 1-7 : 2-3

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5169348

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EF3F1E1D-7FE4-4495-9298-7AB776F83C66

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D58811-FFA4-FF9A-FF06-FECFFE9AFCB0

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Solenoptera tomentosa Lingafelter, 2015
status

 

Solenoptera tomentosa Lingafelter, 2015 View in CoL ( Fig. 1–20 View Figures 1–6 View Figures 7–11 View Figures 12–17 View Figures 18–20 )

Description. Female ( Fig. 1–6 View Figures 1–6 , 12, 14, 16 View Figures 12–17 , 18–19 View Figures 18–20 ). Head dark brown; pronotum dark reddish-brown; elytra reddish-brown at base, gradually becoming reddish posteriorly; basal antennomeres dark brown; mandibles blackish at apex; femora, tibiae, tarsi and apical antennomeres reddish-brown; ventral surface dark brown.

Head ( Fig. 18 View Figures 18–20 ). Surface glabrous except some setae around eyes and base of scape and on clypeus; sparsely punctate; central area between antennal tubercles and middle of upper ocular lobes with pronounced, triangular-shaped sulcus, narrowed on vertex and not reaching apex of pronotum ( Fig. 12 View Figures 12–17 ); clypeus strongly punctate; mandibles relatively short and broad, weekly arcuate, with acute apex, cutting edge with small tooth, centrally with a few setae; hypostomal area very coarsely punctaterugose from gula to anterior third, with a few setae ( Fig. 14 View Figures 12–17 ). Antennal tubercles with small setae at base ( Fig. 19 View Figures 18–20 ). Antennae surpassing elytral base by about 3 antennomeres; antennomeres glabrous, flattened ventrally; scape reaching or extending to just beyond posterior edge of eye, thick, coarsely and moderately punctate; antennomeres IV–IX triangular, constricted at base; segments III–X decreasing in length; poriferous sensory areas as follows: antennomere III with very small dorsal apicolateral rounded patch; one row of three very small apicolateral patches on IV; one row of three apicolateral patches and one apicodorsal patch on V; two rows of three-four apicolateral and apicodorsal patches and many small ones basidorsally on VI–IX; many different sized patches on most dorsal and lateral surfaces of X–XI, larger ones along margins ( Fig. 19 View Figures 18–20 ). Antennal formula (ratio) based on length of antennomere III: scape = 1.17; pedicel = 0.23; IV = 0.73; V = 0.67; VI = 0.61; VII = 0.59; VIII = 0.56; IX = 0.53; X = 0.44; XI = 0.61.

Thorax ( Fig. 12, 14 View Figures 12–17 , 18 View Figures 18–20 ). Prothorax transverse, almost rectangular, 1.72 times wider than long; sides with acute spine on anterolateral and posterolateral margins, both pointed backward; lateral margins strongly crenulate; posterolateral angle abruptly narrowed; pronotum shiny, weekly punctate on disc, with deep Y-shaped depression anteriorly; lateral areas shiny, rugose-punctate, with a variable irregular golden pubescence on both side of median sulcus, and dense fringe of golden pubescence on anterior margin ( Fig. 12 View Figures 12–17 ). Prosternum shiny, transversely strongly convex, longitudinally rugose in center; prosternal process notched at apex, lobes not divergent, base lacking protuberance; with fringe of golden pubescence around procoxae. Pronotum and prosternum without sexual micropunctation. Mesosternum and metepisternum with dense golden pubescence. Metasternum with dense golden pubescence except centrally ( Fig. 14 View Figures 12–17 ). Scutellum triangular, with golden pubescence obscuring integument.

Elytra ( Fig. 16 View Figures 12–17 ). Sides nearly parallel, slightly tapering at apical third and not divergent apically at suture; 1.90 times longer than humeral width; nearly glabrous, with very small, suberect setae in each puncture (only visible at high magnification); semirugose basally, densely punctate throughout, punctures gradually smaller toward apex; elytral apex rounded with a few, slightly distinct crenulae, and weakly dentiform apicolaterally and at suture.

Legs. Short; coxae with golden pubescent patches (more evident on pro- and mesocoxae); femora gradually clavate, without pubescence, finely punctate and without denticles on profemora; hind femur extending to apical fifth of elytra; tibiae with dense golden-orange pubescence on inner margins of api- cal half and without denticles.

Abdomen. Ventrites with wide, dense golden pubescent bands laterally, glabrous centrally, where they are moderately, weakly punctate; last ventrite 1.25 times longer than fourth, rounded, almost flat, without broad emargination at distal margin ( Fig. 2–4 View Figures 1–6 ).

Dimensions, females (in mm). Total length, 29.6/25.3. Pronotum: length, 6.5/5.4; anterior width, 9.7/8.6; posterior width, 10.5/9.8. Elytral length, 20.1/17.2. Humeral width, 10.6/9.3.

Specimens examined. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, Provincia de Pedernales: Oviedo (17°49′10.3″N / 71°26′15.1″W), 1 male and 2 females, Nov-2003, J.A. Genaro leg. (MNHNCu) GoogleMaps ; Fondo Paradí, Parque Nacional Jaragua (17°45′15″N / 71°24′01″W), 1 male, Feb-2002, J.A. Genaro, E. Gutierrez & G. Alayon col. (MNHNCu) GoogleMaps .

Remarks. Sexual dimorphism: The morphological differences between the sexes are largely confined to the thoracic segments. The most noticeable difference lies in the appearance and structure of the pronotum and prosternum. The sides of the pronotal disc in male have a matte, densely micropunctate surface, only interrupted by a narrow, oblique, shiny, sparsely punctate ridge ( Fig. 13 View Figures 12–17 ), while in females they are uniformly shiny and moderately punctate ( Fig. 12 View Figures 12–17 ). Antennomeres VI–X in males have long yellow setae ( Fig. 20 View Figures 18–20 ), while in females they lack setae ( Fig. 19 View Figures 18–20 ). The male anterolateral margins of the pronotum are mostly rounded and without distinct spines on the margin ( Fig. 13 View Figures 12–17 ); conversely, the female anterolateral and posterolateral pronotal margins have an acute spine, directed backwards, and the lateral margins are strongly crenulate ( Fig. 12 View Figures 12–17 ). The prosternum in males is densely micropunctate, except for a nearly smooth central area close to the head and on the prosternal process ( Fig. 15 View Figures 12–17 ); the female prosternum is shiny and only rugose around the upper part of the prosternal process ( Fig. 14 View Figures 12–17 ). The elytra in males have moderately dense, fine, suberect setae throughout ( Fig. 17 View Figures 12–17 ), while the female elytral surface is almost glabrous ( Fig. 16 View Figures 12–17 ).

The abdominal ventrites are transversely more convex in females than in males; pubescence is restricted to the sides of the ventrites ( Fig. 2–5 View Figures 1–6 and 8–11 View Figures 7–11 ), and the posterior margin of ventrite V is truncate in females, but deeply emarginate in males. Finally, unlike in most other Prioninae , there is very little difference in the shape and length of the female and male antennae.

The dimensions (in mm) of the two males studied are: Total length: 26.9/29.1. Pronotum: length, 6.0/6.2; anterior width, 8.8/9,0; posterior width, 8,8/9.7. Elytral length, 17.1/19.0. Humeral width, 9.3/10.1.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Solenoptera

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF