Scutacarus crinitus, Khaustov, Alexander A., 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4013.2.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:78DDD4C3-A37A-45DA-B190-673224664C97 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6107310 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D6332E-FFD7-FFB8-30DB-ACACFEF17807 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scutacarus crinitus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Scutacarus crinitus sp. nov.
( Figs. 9–11 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 , 12 View FIGURE 12 C, 13A)
Description. FEMALE (holotype). Length of idiosoma 195 (185–195 in 7 paratypes), width 190 (185–190). Gnathosoma ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ): similar to that of S. myrmicinus sp. nov., but minute postpalpal setae present anterolaterally to setae cha. Setae cha and chb sparsely barbed. Rough microsculpture present only on lateral surfaces of gnathosoma and not reaching to bases of setae m. Idiosomal dorsum ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A). Prodorsum as in S. lasiophilus sp. nov. All dorsal shields with numerous small dimples. Setae e and h 2 vestigial. Setae c 1, c 2 and d heavily barbed and slightly thickened distally ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A). Setae f and h 1 short, blunt-ended and weakly barbed. Cupules ia on tergite D and ih on tergite H large, round. Tergite EF with 1 pair of oval porous fields situated anteromedially to setae f. Small pore-like structures situated posteromedially to setae c 1 on tergite C and medially to d on tergite D. Lengths of dorsal setae: c 1 30 (29 – 32), c 2 28 (28 – 29), d 31 (33–36), f 9 (9–10), h 1 9 (9–10). Distances between setae: c 1– c 1 53 (53–55), d–d 91 (91–93), f–f 89 (88–93), h 1– h 1 46 (43–46). Idiosomal venter ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 B). All ventral plates with numerous small dimples. Apodemes as in S. myrmicinus sp. nov. Setae 2 b slightly thickened, smooth, blunt-ended, setae 4 a smooth, situated on the same level as 4 b and not reaching beyond posterior margin of poststernal plate, setae ps 3 short and smooth. Other ventral setae distinctly barbed. Secondary transverse sclerotized line on poststernal plate present. Anterior genital sclerite complicate, similar to that of S. lasiophilus sp. nov. ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 C), posterior genital sclerite large, triangular. Lengths of ventral setae: 1 a 29 (28–39), 1 b 25 (23–26), 2 a 25 (23–26), 2 b 20 (19–21), 3 a 27 (25–28), 3 b 35 (30–35), 3 c 32 (29–33), 4 a 14 (13–14), 4 b 32 (21–34), 4 c 33 (32–35), ps 1 17 (16– 18), ps 2 17 (16–18), ps 3 5 (4–5). Legs ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 ). Leg I ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 A) as in S. myrmicinus sp. nov. Lengths of solenidia: ω 1 9 (8–9)> ω 2 6 (6–7) = φ 1 6 (6–7) = φ 2 6 (6–7); ω 2 and φ 2 baculiform, φ 1 clavate, ω 1 finger-shaped. Leg II ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 B) as in S. lasiophilus sp. nov. Solenidion ω 7 (6–7) finger-shaped. Leg III as in S. lasiophilus sp. nov. Leg IV ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ) as in S. lasiophilus sp. nov. except seta tc” distinctly barbed and slightly longer than d of tibiotarsus.
MALE and LARVA unknown.
Type material. Female holotype, slide AK 170914 and 9 female paratypes, RUSSIA: Tyumen Province, vicinity of Tyumen, 57°13'43.6" N, 65°28'28.4" E, on ants Lasius niger , 17 September 2014, coll. A.A. Khaustov.
Type deposition. Holotype and 7 paratypes deposited in TUMZ; 2 paratypes in ZISP.
Etymology. The name of a new species is derived from the Latin word crinitus meaning "fluffy" and referring to the heavily barbed setae on tergites C and D.
Differential diagnosis. Female of the new species is very similar to S. ellipticus Karafiat, 1959 by the presence of a secondary sclerotized line on the poststernal plate and similar relative lengths of dorsal idiosomal setae. It differs from S. ellipticus by heavily barbed and slightly thickened distally setae on tergites C and D (not so heavily barbed and not thickened in S. ellipticus as in Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 B) and by shorter setae f and h 1 9–10 long (vs. 15–16 in S. ellipticus ).
ZISP |
Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |