EURETIDAE ZITTEL, 1877
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00753.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5492163 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D67546-CB71-C87D-FC1E-BB38FE63F9C5 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
EURETIDAE ZITTEL, 1877 |
status |
|
EURETIDAE ZITTEL, 1877 View in CoL
Revised diagnosis (emended from Reiswig & Wheeler, 2002, for inclusion of Sarostegia ; addition highlighted in bold): Body form either of branching and/or anastomosing tubes, or cup-funnel formed of a ring of tubes, or of a single tube, or of a single-wall funnel with or without lateral oscula extended on marginal tubes, or blade form; dictyonal meshes mainly rectangular or triangular or irregular; meshes usually equal-sided but elongate prismatic mesh series with transverse lamellae developed in some species; dictyonal strands, if developed, orientated longitudinally; with or without dictyonal cortices composed of primary or secondary dictyonalia; dermalia and atrialia are commonly pentactins or pinular hexactins with rays of approximately equal length, or both forms lacking; scopules, which might also be represented by sarules, and uncinates are usually present but are lacking in two genera; microscleres occur as oxyhexasters and/or discohexasters.
Remarks: Euretidae , being the most species-rich family of Hexactinosida ( Reiswig & Wheeler, 2002; Leys et al., 2007), is morphologically highly diverse and taxonomically poorly defined (see above); in lack of potential autapomorphies, its validity remains to be tested with molecular data.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.