Ipsiura frieseana ( Ducke, 1902 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4165.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2D809845-D7A0-4612-BB9E-0A4AC2BF8890 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6055642 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D687A8-FA56-AC41-97CB-C53FFB6AE0CC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ipsiura frieseana ( Ducke, 1902 ) |
status |
|
Ipsiura frieseana ( Ducke, 1902)
( Figs 57–62 View FIGURES 57 – 62 )
Chrysis frieseana Ducke, 1902: 99 . Lectotype Ƌ [examined by photos]: BRAZIL: Pará (MNHN). Designed by Bohart, in Kimsey & Bohart (1991: 509).
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) frieseana: Bohart 1966: 142 .
Ipsiura frieseana: Bohart 1985: 710 .
Diagnosis. Ipsiura frieseana most closely resembles I. genbergi (Dahlbom) , I. lilloi Bohart and I. obidana Bohart. It can be readily distinguished from these and other Ipsiura species by the following combination of characters: T3 with low, sloping gently prepit swelling (absent or not recognizable in I. genbergi , I. lilloi and I. obidana ), T3 with shallow, reduced, and well-separated punctures (definite punctures in I. genbergi , I. lilloi and I. obidana ); S2 spots separated medially by one-half spot diameter (touching in I. obidana ), and large basolateral whitish spot on T3 (narrow spot in I. obidana ).
Female description. Body ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 57 – 62 ). Length: 7.8 mm. Coloration: head predominantly green; F1 brownish green; mesosoma metallic green, with faint bluish highlights on dorsum, mostly on mesoscutum and pronotum; metasoma metallic green, with conspicuous transverse purplish stripes on dorsum of T1 and T2; T3 with large lateral whitish spot; wing membrane light brown, with brown veins; femora and tibiae greenish; tarsi light brown, meso- and hind basitarsi green. Head: TFC enclosing the median ocellus, widely opened medially, with distinct lateral secondary facial carina ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 57 – 62 ); F1 longer than broad, 1.3× as long as F2; scapal basin with dense silvery pubescence. Mesosoma: fore femur without flattened area or ventral tooth-like projection on outer surface of distal margin, diameter of distal area subequal to diameter of proximal area; fore wing with short M distal to discoidal cell (as in Fig. 190 View FIGURE 190 ), R1 short, obsolescent (as in Fig. 145 View FIGURES 141 – 146 ); dorsal surface of pronotum wider than head; lower lateral pronotal surface irregularly punctate anteriorly, with indistinct posterior area delimited by faint transverse ridge; metanotum slightly elevated distally but not projecting above the propodeal surface; mesopleural lower posterior margin carinate, with equally separated tooth-like projections. Metasoma: T3 with six acute distal teeth ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 57 – 62 ), pit row obsolescent, indicated primarily by small lateral pits, prepit swelling very low, sloping gently; S2 spots medium-sized, medially separated by one spot diameter ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 57 – 62 ). Punctation: fore femur impunctate, tiny, sparse punctures only distally on outer surface; T3 with shallow, tiny and well-separated punctures.
Male. Same as female, except for the characteristic shape of S2 spots as shown in Fig. 60 View FIGURES 57 – 62 and the broad dark band occupying much of the dorsum of meso- and metasoma. Genital capsule ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 57 – 62 ): cuspis as long as gonostylus, broader than gonostylus basally; digitus very narrow, clavate apically; gonostylus and cuspis with short setae apically; aedeagus lobes acute apically, strongly convergent apically.
Variation. The most conspicuous variation noticed in this species involves the distal margin of T3. Some specimens have a short distal margin, with small teeth, and a flattened appearance in dorsal view (Brazil: Pará, Óbidos–MZUSP). Body length 6.6–7.9 mm.
Hosts. Unknown.
Distribution. Brazil (AC, AM, BA, MA, MG, PA, SC, SP); Ecuador (Morona Santiago); French Guiana (Kourou); Surinam (Paramaribo) ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 57 – 62 ).
Material examined. BRAZIL: Pará 19.8.99 Ducke, A. / Musem Paris Brésil / Lectotype Ƌ Chrysis frieseana Ducke ( MNHM) . Macapá , 21.v.1900, Ducke, A. / Paralectotype 1♀ Chrysis frieseana Ducke [ MNHN] .
Additional material. BRAZIL: Acre, Senador Guiomard , Res. Catuaba 19. xi.2002, 1 Ƌ, coll. E.F. Morato [BME] . Amazonas, Embrapa Km 31/AM 6. ii.1992, 1 ♀, coll. L.P. Albuquerqu & J.E. Binda [ INPA]. Same data except 7 . viii.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 9. i.1991, 2 ♀ [INPA], 12. xii.1991, 2 ♀ [INPA], 13. iii.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 14. xii.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 16. x.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 18. vi.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 19. ii.1992, 1 ♀ [INPA], 23. xi.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 25. ix.1991, 2 ♀ [INPA], 26. xii.1991, 3 ♀ [INPA], 28. vi.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 28. viii.1991, 1 ♀ [INPA], 28. xi.1991, 2 ♀ [INPA]. Manaus–Reserva Ducke/AM 1. xii.1988, 1 ♀, coll. J.A. Rafael [INPA]. Same data except 6. x.1988, 2 ♀ [INPA], 7. xii.1988, 1 ♀ 1Ƌ [INPA], 12. i.1989, 1 ♀ [INPA], 15. viii.1978, 1 ♀ [INPA], 19. i.1989, 1 ♀, coll. L.P. Albuquerque & J.E. Binda [INPA]. Manaus–Reserva Ducke/AM 26. viii.1988, 3 ♀, coll. Y.C. Mara & F. Xavi [INPA]. Same data except 30. iv.1982, 1 ♀, coll. J.A. Rafael [INPA], x.2003, 1 ♀, coll. A. Henriques [INPA]. Bahia, Jequié campus da UESB II 25 . iii.2007, 1 ♀, coll. J.C. Silva-JR & Col. [LEBIC]. Maranhão, Igarapé Grande–Aldeia Araçu v.1963, 1 ♀, coll. Malkin [BME] . Minas Gerais, Marliéria, Parque Estadual do Rio Doce ( PELD), Área Tereza 3, 26 . x.2004, 1 ♀, coll. J.C.R. Fontenelle [UFES]. Same data except 24. x.2002, 1 ♀ [UFES], 03–10. xi.2004, 1 ♀ [UFES], 18–25. x.2001, 1 ♀ [UFES], 24–31. x.2002, 1 ♀ [UFES], 24. x.2002, 1 ♀ [UFES], 08–15. xi.2001, 1 ♀ [UFES], 28. x.2007, 1 ♀ [UFES], 18–25. x.2001, 1 ♀ [UFES], 10–17. xi.2004, 1 ♀ [UFES], 07–14. viii.2002, 1 ♀ [UFES], 14. xi.2002, 1 ♀ [UFES], 24. x.2002, 1 ♀ [UFES], 24–31. x.2002, 2 ♀ [UFES], 18–25. x.2001, 1 ♀ [UFES], 09–1. xi.2003, 1 ♀ [UFES], 03–10. xi.2004, 2 ♀ [UFES], 09–13. xii.2003, 1 ♀ [UFES], 08–10. xii.2003, 1 Ƌ [UFES], 20–27. x.2004, 1 Ƌ [UFES]. Pará, Bujaru 7. x.1977, 1 ♀ , coll. P. Waldir [MPEG]. Óbidos, 1♀, coll. A. Ducke [MZUSP]. Same data except 24. xii.1904, 1 ♀, [MPEG], 4. ix.1907, 1 ♀ [MPEG], 1. i.1907, 1 ♀ [BME], 21. xii.1903, 1 ♀ [MPEG], 3. i.1905, 1 Ƌ [MPEG]. Teffé 22. vi.1906, 1 Ƌ, coll. A. Ducke [MPEG]. Itaituba, R. Tapajós 4. ix.1902, 1 Ƌ, A. Ducke [MPEG]. Itaituba, R. Tapajós 4. ix.1902, 1 Ƌ, coll. A. Ducke [MPEG]. Santarém ix, 1Ƌ, coll. A. Ducke [BME]. Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia ii.1966, 1 Ƌ , coll. Fritz Plaumann [BME]. São Paulo, Luis Antônio, Est. Ecol. Jataí 21 . xi.2007, 1 ♀, coll. N.W. Perioto [LRRP]. Same data except 7. xi.2007, 1 ♀ [LRRP]. Ribeirão Preto, campus USP, 13–16. x.2013, 1 ♀, coll. Martins, Ignácio, Fachin & Porto [ RPSP]. Teodoro Sampaio, Parque Estadual Morro do Diabo , Sítio São Francisco, 21 . i.2012, 1 ♀, coll. P.R. Lopes [ RPSP]. ECUADOR: Morona Santiago, Cord. De Cutucu 2 . vi.1981, 1 Ƌ, coll. M. Cooper [BME]. Same data except 3. vi.1981, 1 Ƌ [BME], 9. v.1981, 1 Ƌ [BME]. FRENCH GUIANA: Kourou, Dégrad Saramaca vi.2005, 1 ♀, coll. D. Faure [BME] . SURINAM: Paramaribo, Ma Retraite 20 . i.1964, 1 ♀, coll. D.C. Geijskes [BME].
Comments. The redescription above is based on a female from Brazil: Amazonas, Manaus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ipsiura frieseana ( Ducke, 1902 )
Lucena, Daercio A. A., Kimsey, Lynn S. & Almeida, Eduardo A. B. 2016 |
Ipsiura frieseana:
Bohart 1985: 710 |
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) frieseana:
Bohart 1966: 142 |
Chrysis frieseana
Kimsey 1991: 509 |
Ducke 1902: 99 |