Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4165.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2D809845-D7A0-4612-BB9E-0A4AC2BF8890 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6055701 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D687A8-FA7F-AC18-97CB-C6ECFAA0E698 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985 |
status |
|
Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985
( Figs 179–184 View FIGURES 179 – 184 )
Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985: 719 . Holotype Ƌ [examined]: MEXICO: Morelos, Cuernavaca (BME).
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) amaurotica Linsenmaier, 1985 . Holotype Ƌ [not examined]: BRAZIL (NMLS). Synonymized by Kimsey & Bohart (1991: 511).
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) tropicalis: Linsenmaier 1997: 266 .
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) tropicalis amaurotica: Linsenmaier 1997: 266 .
Diagnosis. Ipsiura tropicalis most closely resembles I. spiculella Bohart. It can be distinguished by the following combination of characters: T3 with distinct lateral whitish spot (narrow, obsolescent in I. spiculella ), prepit swelling sloping gently (absent in I. spiculella ), pit row represented by large, deep foveae; TFC almost complete medially (medially interrupted in I. spiculella ); aedeagus lobes acute apically (blunt in I. spiculella ), and S2 spots medium-sized, touching medially (large spots, slightly separated medially in I. spiculella ).
Female description. Body ( Fig. 179 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ). Length: 6.8 mm. Coloration: head predominantly green blue, with bluish highlights on vertex; F1 brownish green; mesosoma metallic green, with purplish blue stripe on pronotum, broad purplish blue band on dorsum of mesoscutum; metasoma metallic green, with bluish purple transverse stripes on dorsum of T1 and T2; T3 with bluish highlights dorsally, with lateral whitish spot; wing membrane light brown, with brown veins; femora and tibiae greenish; tarsi brown, basitarsi brownish green. Head: TFC slightly interrupted medially ( Fig. 180 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ); F1 longer than broad, 1.3× as long as F2; scapal basin densely covered with silvery pubescence. Mesosoma: fore femur without ventral tooth-like projection or flattened area on outer surface of distal margin, diameter of distal area about one-half diameter of proximal area; fore wing with short M distal to discoidal cell, R1 shorter than stigma (as in Fig. 190 View FIGURE 190 ); dorsal surface of pronotum wider than head; lower lateral pronotal surface irregularly punctate anteriorly, with distinct posterior area delimited by transverse ridge; metanotum rounded, without differentiated surface; mesopleural lower posterior margin carinate, with indistinct tooth-like projections. Metasoma: T3 with four obtuse distal teeth ( Fig. 181 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ), pit row with large, deep foveae, prepit swelling low, sloping gently; S2 spots medium-sized, touching medially ( Fig. 182 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ). Punctation: fore femur with tiny, sparse punctures on outer surface; dorsal surface of T3 with definite, deep punctures; dorsal surface of T1 and metanotum with largest punctures.
Male. Same as female, except for the characteristic shape of S2 spots as shown in Fig. 182 View FIGURES 179 – 184 . Genital capsule ( Fig. 183 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ): gonostylus slightly longer than cuspis; digitus narrow; cuspis shield-like, broad basally; gonostylus setose apically; aedeagus lobes sharp, pointed apically.
Variation. The holotype and specimens from the Central America and north South America are primarily greenish blue. Additionally, specimens from those localities have a broad cuspis basally (as in the Fig. 183 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ). On the other hand, the South American specimens are predominantly green (as in the Figs 179–181 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ), and also have the slenderer cuspis instead, but we had considered that these features do not form a pattern. Body length 6.4–6.9 mm.
Hosts. Unknown.
Distribution. Argentina (Salta, Tucumán); Bolivia (Santa Cruz); Brazil (AM, BA, ES, MG, MT, PA, PR, RR, SC, SE, SP); Colombia (Meta); Costa Rica (Guanacaste, San Jose); Ecuador (Napo, Santa Cecilia); Mexico (Morelos, Oaxaca, Veracruz); Panama ( Panamá Oeste); Surinam (Paramaribo); Venezuela (Aragua) ( Fig. 184 View FIGURES 179 – 184 ).
Remarks. Ipsiura tropicalis is the most common species in South America.
Material examined. MEXICO: Morelos, 5 mi East Cuernavaca 26.iii.1962 F.D.Parker / Holotype Ƌ (BME). Same data except 26–29.iii.1962 / Paratypes 3Ƌ 10♀ [BME]. Vera Cruz , Cordoba 6.vii.1966 J.S. Buckett, M.R & R.C. Gardner / Paratypes 2♀ [BME]. Vera Cruz, Minatitlán 8.ix.1961, coll. R. & K. Dreisbach / Paratype 1Ƌ [BME] . Oaxaca, Palomarea 5.xi.1961 coll. R. & K. Dreisbach / Paratype 1Ƌ [BME] . COSTA RICA: San Jose coll. R. Bohart / Paratype 1♀ [BME]. Guanacaste, Hacienda Pacífica / Paratype 1Ƌ [BME] . PANAMA: Rio Trinidad, Pan 16.iii.12 / Paratype 1♀ [BME].
Additional material. ARGENTINA: Tucumán, El Solidad 16. ix.1969, 1 ♀, coll. L.A. Stange [BME]. La Soledad 11 . viii.1966, 1 ♀, coll. E. Bucher [BME]. Rio Nio 26 . iv.1966, 1 ♀, coll. L.A. Stange [BME]. Salta, Orãn Abra Grande 9 . ii.1967, 1 ♀, coll. R. Coolback [BME]. Orãn Abra Grande 18. iv.1969, 1 ♀, coll. C. Porter [BME]. Tartagal xi.1971, 1 Ƌ, coll. Manfredo Fritz [BME]. Tartagal 11 . viii.1973, 2 ♀, coll. C. Porter [BME]. Pocitos, 2♀, coll. Manfredo Fritz [BME]. BOLIVIA: Sunchal, 1♀, coll. M. Fritz [BME] . BRAZIL: Amazonas, Rio Taruma Mirim 29 . xi.1991, 1 ♀, coll. M.V. Garcia [ INPA]. Bahia, Jequié, campus UESB II 19 . ix.2005, 1 ♀, coll. J.C. Silva-Jr [ RPSP]. Espírito Santo, Santa Teresa 12 . x.1964, 1 Ƌ, coll. C. Elias [ DZUP]. Mato Grosso, Cáceres 16 . i.1985, 1 Ƌ, coll. C. Elias [ DZUP]. Minas Gerais, Barbacena 24 . x.1905, 1 Ƌ, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Patrocínio 5 . x.1965, 1 ♀, coll. C. Elias [ DZUP]. Pará 8 . xi.1901, 1 ♀, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Itaituba, Rio Tapajós 3 . ix.1902, 1 ♀, coll. A. Ducke [MPEG]. R. Arroyollos 21. iv.1903, 1 ♀, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Faro 16 . vii.1903, 1 Ƌ, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Óbidos 21 . xi.1904, 1 Ƌ 1♀, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Tefé 10 . vi.1906, 1 ♀, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Lago Grande de Villa Franca 6 . i.1907, 2 Ƌ, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Óbidos 20 . xi.1907, 1 Ƌ, coll. A. Ducke [ MPEG]. Same data except 6 . x.1909, 1 ♀ [MPEG], 27. vii.1912, 1 ♀ [MPEG], 1906, 1Ƌ [MPEG], 20. xii.1904, 1 ♀ [BME], 1. i.1907, 1 ♀ [BME]. Paraná, Ponta Grossa 28 . iv.1988, 1 ♀, coll. Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR [ DZUP]. Roraima, Rio Uraricoera , Ilha de Maraca 2 . v.1986, 1 ♀, coll. J.A. Rafael, J.E.B. Brasil & L.S. Aquino [ INPA]. Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia 30. x.1963, 1 ♀, coll. Fritz Plaumann [BME]. Same data except 18 . x.1965, 1 ♀ [BME], x.1965, 1 ♀ [BME], xi.1965, 1 ♀ 1Ƌ [BME], xi.1966, 1 ♀ [BME], ii.1974, 1 ♀ [BME]. São Paulo, Araçatuba x.1961, 1 ♀, coll. J. Lane & Rabello [ MZUSP]. Juquiá 1935, 1♀, coll. J. Lane [BME]. Luis Antônio , Est. Ecol. Jataí 7 . xi.2007, 1 ♀, coll. N.W. Perioto [ RPSP]. Same data except 11 . x.2007, 1 ♀ [LRRP], 15. x.2008, 1 ♀ [LRRP], 29. x.2008, 1 ♀ [LRRP], 30. ix.2009, 1 ♀ [LRRP], 5. xii.2007, 1 ♀ [LRRP], 24. x.2007, 1 ♀ [LRRP], 26. xi.2008, 1 ♀ [ LRRP]. Ribeirão Preto, campus USP, 1♀, coll. L.C. Rocha-Filho [ RPSP]. Teodoro Sampaio, Parque Estadual Morro do Diabo , Sítio São Francisco 23.vi.2011 –14 . iv.2012, 7 ♀, coll. P.R. Lopes [ RPSP]. Sergipe, Canindé do São Francisco 25 . xi.2002, 1 Ƌ, coll. Débora Moura [LEBIC]. COLOMBIA: Meta El Porvenir 27. ii.1979, 1 Ƌ, coll. R. Wilkerson [BME] . ECUADOR: Napo, Limoncocha 25 . ix.1974, 1 Ƌ, coll. B.A. Drummond [BME]. Santa Cecília, Napo Pastaza 14 . vi.1967, 1 ♀, coll. J.D. Lynch [BME]. SURINAM: Samatraweg, Lelydorp 1964, 1Ƌ, coll. D.C. Geijskes [BME]. Paramaribo 21 . iii.1964, 1 Ƌ, coll. D.C. Geijskes [BME]. Same data except 10. iv.1964, 1 ♀ [BME]. Republier 28. ii.1963, 1 ♀, coll. D.C. Geijskes [BME]. VENEZUELA: Aragua, Cagua iv.1965, 2 ♀, coll. E. Doreste [BME]. El Limon 19 . ii.1960, 1 ♀, coll. M. Gelbes [BME].
Comments. The redescription above is based on a female from Brazil: São Paulo, Luis Antônio.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985
Lucena, Daercio A. A., Kimsey, Lynn S. & Almeida, Eduardo A. B. 2016 |
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) tropicalis:
Linsenmaier 1997: 266 |
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) tropicalis amaurotica:
Linsenmaier 1997: 266 |
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) amaurotica
Kimsey 1991: 511 |
Ipsiura tropicalis
Bohart 1985: 719 |