Prionocrangon brasiliensis, Anker, Arthur, Pachelle, Paulo P. G. & Tavares, Marcos, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3815.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B6DBB09-F677-4181-8329-27F00A640EAE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6133556 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D7870B-FFB1-FFA1-DBF1-F476FC38F9E2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Prionocrangon brasiliensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Prionocrangon brasiliensis View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 , 8 View FIGURE 8
Material examined. Southwestern Atlantic Ocean off Brazil: holotype, male (cl 4.8 mm), TAAF MD 55 / BRÉSIL 1987, station 54 CB 93, depth: 707–733 m, 19º36’S 38º53’W, 30.V.1987 ( MZUSP 31147); paratype, male (cl 5.5 mm), TAAF MD 55 / BRÉSIL 1987, station 54 CB 93, depth: 707–733 m, 19º36’S 38º53’W, 30.V.1987 ( MZUSP 31146); paratype, ovigerous female (cl 7.6 mm), TAAF MD 55 / BRÉSIL 1987, station 54 CB 93, depth: 707–733 m, 19º36’S 38º53’W, 30.V.1987 ( MZUSP 31498).
Description. Rostrum relatively long, usually reaching beyond base of branchiostegal (= pterygostomial) tooth, directed obliquely upwards, distally subacute, about 0.11–0.12 times as long as carapace ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 a, h, l). Middorsal carina of carapace armed with 10–13 teeth, two or three of them beyond carapace mid-length, anterior-most tooth distinctly removed from rostrum ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 a, h, l). Antennal tooth relatively small, subtriangular, marginal; pterygostomial tooth very strong, falling short of tip of distolateral tooth of antennal basicerite, not reaching beyond distal margin of eyestalks ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 a, b).
Fourth and fifth abdominal somites without dorsal carina; fourth and fifth somites faintly pitted; sixth somite about 1.6 times as long as fifth (measured along mid-dorsal line); posterolateral margin with short, truncated lobe, without sharp tooth; ventrolateral angle with conspicuous depression, without deep incision ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 d). Telson subequal to sixth abdominal somite in length, much shorter than uropods; lateral margins more or less straight in anterior portion of telson, with strong convexity at about mid-length, and strongly convergent posterior to this convexity; dorsal surface with three pairs of spiniform setae, one pair near mid-length convexity and two pairs in posterior half of strongly tapering portion of telson, most-posterior pair adjacent to posterior margin; posterior margin rounded, about 0.25 length of proximal width of telson, with shallow median depression and two long, thick, plumose setae, without minute median denticle; ventral surface with strong teeth, forming telson-uropodal locking mechanism ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 e, f).
Eyestalks elongate, cylindrical, with blunt extremities, somewhat twisted, curving ventrally in-between antennular peduncles; ventral surface with one more or less developed denticle ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 b, c, i). Antennular peduncle with long proximal article, about 0.6 times as long as carapace; stylocerite with elongate, acute tip, not reaching distal margin of eyestalks ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 a, b). Antenna with basicerite armed with strong distolateral tooth; scaphocerite equal to or slightly shorter than proximal article of antennular peduncle, with extremely narrow blade and small distolateral tooth ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 b, j, tip sometimes broken). Third maxilliped with rudimentary exopod ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 a).
First pereiopod with merus bearing small, sharp distodorsal tooth; palm moderately stout, 4.0–4.2 times as long as wide; pollex situated between 0.6 and 0.7 length of palm, stout, ending in sharp point; dactylus sickleshaped, not reaching proximal base of pollex when fully closed ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 b–d, j). Second and third pereiopods typical for genus ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 e, f). Fourth and fifth pereiopods with dactyli expanded, with minute terminal hook, 0.6 and 0.5 times as long as propodi, respectively ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 g–i).
Endopods and protopods of pleopods without lateral lobe or distoventral projection; endopod of female second pleopod about 0.25 times as long as exopod; male second pleopod with appendix masculina much shorter than endopod, with few robust setae apically ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 k). Uropod without specific features ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 e).
Colour pattern unknown.
Etymology. Refers to the new species’ occurrence on the continental slope of Brazil; used as an adjective.
Distribution. Western Atlantic: presently known only from the type locality off Espírito Santo, Brazil, at a depth of 707– 733 m.
Remarks. Prionocrangon is morphologically a very homogeneous genus, making separation of the eight currently recognised species ( Kim & Chan 2005; Hendrickx & Ayón-Parente 2012) extremely difficult. As Chace (1984) noted, “one feature that seems to be most useful in distinguishing the species, from prevailing knowledge, is the form of the degenerate eyes and eyestalks”. Kim & Chan (2005) used this character throughout their revision of the genus, distinguishing between species with triangular eyestalks inhabiting deeper waters (1033–2556 m) and species with the eyestalks “drawn out to bluntly cylindrical or villiform extremities” from somewhat shallower depths (200–891 m).
Prionocrangon brasiliensis View in CoL sp. nov. is morphologically very close to Prionocrangon pectinata Faxon, 1896 View in CoL , the only other Atlantic species of the genus, known from depths of 516–1236 m in the Gulf of Mexico and 200–1033 m in the Caribbean Sea ( Faxon 1896; Cruz et al. 2002; Felder et al. 2009), differing from it most conspicuously by the elongate, cylindrical, distally broad and blunt eyestalks ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 b, c) vs. much shorter, triangular, i.e. distally narrowing eyestalks in P. pectinata View in CoL ( Cruz et al. 2002: fig. 4; Kim & Chan 2005: fig. 3B, C). In this respect, the new species resembles the Indo-West Pacific species Prionocrangon ommatosteres View in CoL Wood- Mason in Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891, Prionocrangon dofleini Balss, 1913 View in CoL , Prionocrangon curvicaulis Yaldwyn, 1960 View in CoL , and Prionocrangon formosa Kim & Chan, 2005 ( Kim & Chan 2005) View in CoL . The Brazilian species differs from P. ommatosteres View in CoL by the shorter antennal scaphocerite and much broader and shorter telson, the latter also with a different configuration of dorsal spines; from P. do f l e i n i by the absence of mid-dorsal carina on the fourth and fifth abdominal somites and broader telson; from P. curvicaulis View in CoL by the much shorter antennal scaphocerite (reaching far beyond distal margin of first article of antennular peduncle in P. c u r v i c au l i s vs. not reaching this margin in P. brasiliensis View in CoL sp. nov.); and from P. formosa View in CoL by the fewer teeth on the carapace (6 in P. f o r m o s a vs. 10 –13 in P. brasiliensis View in CoL sp. nov.) and more convex lateral margin of the telson (cf. Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 , 8 View FIGURE 8 and Kim & Chan 2005: figs. 1, 4–8). The new species also differs from the recently described Prionocrangon incisum Hendrickx View in CoL & Ayón- Parente, 2012 from the eastern Pacific, by the absence of a deep incision on the posteroventral margin of the sixth abdominal somite, apically broad (not narrowing) eyestalks, and absence of a distinct U-shaped groove on the carapace flanks (cf. Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 a, b, d and Hendrickx & Ayón-Parente 2012: 1A, C, E, G, H).
The authors are aware that the shape of the eyestalks and some of the other characters currently used in taxonomy of Prionocrangon View in CoL ( Chace 1984; Kim & Chan 2005) may eventually be shown to be variable. In addition, the scarcity of the material makes taxonomic decisions even more challenging. However, assigning the Brazilian specimens to one of the previously described species, for instance, to the Atlantic P. pectinata View in CoL with much shorter, triangular eyestalks, or to one of the Indo-West Pacific taxa with similarly elongate eyestalks, but with one or two differences in other features, would seriously destabilise the current taxonomic concept of Prionocrangon ( Kim & Chan 2005) View in CoL . Future research on this rare and bizarre genus, including comparison of DNA sequences from fresh specimens, will show whether P. brasiliensis View in CoL sp. nov. is a distinct southwestern Atlantic taxon or conspecific with P. pectinata View in CoL or one of the Indo-West Pacific (and hence pantropical) species.
The ecology and biology of Prionocrangon brasiliensis View in CoL sp. nov. remains largely unknown. The type series was found syntopically with another crangonid shrimp, Parapontophilus gracilis View in CoL , recently reported from Brazil by Cardoso (2013). Interestingly, P. gracilis View in CoL , unlike all species of Prionocrangon View in CoL , has large and well-pigmented corneas. The very large egg size of P. brasiliensis View in CoL sp. nov. ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 g) suggests that this species may have an abbreviated larval development, i.e. with a few lecithotrophic larvae.
MZUSP |
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Prionocrangon brasiliensis
Anker, Arthur, Pachelle, Paulo P. G. & Tavares, Marcos 2014 |
Prionocrangon formosa Kim & Chan, 2005 ( Kim & Chan 2005 )
Kim & Chan, 2005 (Kim & Chan 2005 |
Prionocrangon (
Kim & Chan 2005 |
Prionocrangon curvicaulis
Yaldwyn 1960 |
Prionocrangon dofleini
Balss 1913 |
Prionocrangon pectinata
Faxon 1896 |