Arsipoda punctata, Samuelson & Biondi, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.230 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80B8573D-AEF3-4E98-A9C8-BF652ED4124E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3853539 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8176244E-DFAF-4B0E-9639-9F9BA3CB5BD8 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:8176244E-DFAF-4B0E-9639-9F9BA3CB5BD8 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Arsipoda punctata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Arsipoda punctata sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8176244E-DFAF-4B0E-9639-9F9BA3CB5BD8
Figs 2E View Fig , 5B View Fig , 6D View Fig , 9F View Fig , 15B View Fig
Diagnosis
Arsipoda punctata sp. nov. is an easily distinguishable small, yellow species with a strongly punctate pronotum. Species with similar strong punctuation ( A. isola and A. rutai sp. nov.) are very different in color: bronze, metallic in the case of A. isola , and very dark with greenish metallic lustre in A. rutai sp. nov.; moreover, the pronotal punctuation is unevenly sized in A. isola . Genitalia are also clearly different ( Figs 9A, F, H View Fig , 11I, N View Fig ).
Etymology
The specific epithet is a Latin adjective referring to the strong pronotal punctuation.
Type material
Holotype
NEW CALEDONIA: ³, Mueo , [-21.310337 165.020997], 20 May 1928, J.D.A. Cockerell leg. ( BMNH). GoogleMaps
Paratypes
NEW CALEDONIA: 4 ³³, same data as the holotype ( BMNH).
Description of the holotype (³)
Body slightly convex ( Fig. 2E View Fig ); LB = 1.95 mm; maximum pronotal width at base (WP = 0.74 mm); maximum elytral width at basal third (WE = 0.98 mm). Dorsum yellowish, slightly metallic. Frons and vertex strongly punctate, with microreticulate surface; head grooves short, not continued to postantennal region; genae and frontal carina very short; antennae slightly longer than ½ body length ( LAN = 1.18 mm; LAN/LB = 0.61), yellow; LA: 100:56:44:56:78:78:78:78:89:78:100. Pronotum slightly trapezoidal, distinctly transverse (LP = 0.45 mm; WP/LP = 1.64), laterally straight ( Fig. 5B View Fig ); anterior angles weakly prominent, obliquely beveled; antebasal transverse sulcus moderately impressed, weakly sinuate; lateral fovea almost indistinguishable; pronotal punctuation large, strongly impressed, dense, evenly distributed on the irregularly microreticulate surface. Elytra moderately elongate (LE = 1.48 mm; WE/LE = 0.66), laterally slightly arcuate; punctuation clearly impressed; interstriae microreticulate and micropunctulate.
Legs yellow; first pro- and mesotarsomeres slightly dilated; adhesive setae present on ventral side of first pro-, meso- and, partially, metatarsomeres. Venter brownish; last abdominal ventrite laterally clearly incised, without special pre-apical impressions. Median lobe of aedeagus (LAED = 0.74 mm; LE/LAED = 2.01) ( Fig. 9F View Fig ) in ventral view thickset, tapered toward base, apically subtruncate, with median rounded small
tooth; ventral surface with complete, shallow ventral sulcus, wider at apical ¾; in lateral view, median lobe slightly curved, gradually thinner toward apex; dorsal ligula elongate, narrow, tapered toward apex.
Biometry
Male (n = 5; mean and standard deviation; range): LE = 1.52 ± 0.10 mm (1.40 Ĺ LE Ĺ 1.66 mm); WE = 0.99 ± 0.06 mm (0.90 Ĺ WE Ĺ 1.08 mm); LP = 0.45 ± 0.03 mm (0.40 Ĺ LP Ĺ 0.48 mm); WP = 0.75 ± 0.05 mm (0.68 Ĺ WP Ĺ 0.82 mm); LAN = 1.22 ± 0.07 mm (1.12 Ĺ LAN Ĺ 1.30 mm); LAED = 0.77 ± 0.02 mm (0.74 Ĺ LAED Ĺ 0.79 mm); LB = 2.05 ± 0.19 mm (1.85 Ĺ LB Ĺ 2.97 mm); LE/LP = 3.58 ± 0.15 (3.38 Ĺ LE/LP Ĺ 3.83); WE/WP = 1.47 ± 0.05 (1.42 Ĺ WE/WP Ĺ 2.35); WP/LP = 1.67 ± 0.03 (1.64 Ĺ WP/LP Ĺ 1.71); WE/LE = 0.65 ± 0.01 (0.64 Ĺ WE/LE Ĺ 0.66); LAN/LB = 0.60 ± 0.03 (0.54 Ĺ LAN/ LB Ĺ 0.64); LE/LAED = 1.99 ± 0.08 (1.88 Ĺ LE/LAED Ĺ 2.09). Paratypes (³) very similar in shape, sculpture and color to the holotype.
Female unknown.
Distribution
Endemic to Mueo area, Central Grande Terre ( Fig. 15B View Fig ).
LAN |
Lancing College |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |