Stenocrates clipeatus Endrödi, 1966
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3678492 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:930EAB11-37FA-41B0-980A-1A4736527842 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3682423 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D7FF1C-FF0B-FF2D-FF48-F8773524FB36 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Stenocrates clipeatus Endrödi, 1966 |
status |
|
§ Stenocrates clipeatus Endrödi, 1966
Stenocrates clipeatus Endrödi 1966a: 424 ( Peru)
Distribution. French Guiana: Brûlé et al. 2011a: 192, 2011b: 120, 2014: 182; Duranton 2011: 18; Ponchel 2011: 60; Ratcliffe 2015c: 778; Moore et al. 2018b: 289. Brazil: Ratcliffe 2015c: 778; Moore et al. 2018b: 289. Other: Endrödi 1966a: 424 ( Bolivia, Peru), 1985a: 181 ( Bolivia, Peru); Ratcliffe 2015c: 778 ( Bolivia, Colombia, Peru); Moore et al. 2018b: 289 ( Bolivia, Colombia, Peru).
Note. According to Dupuis (2016b: 103, 2017a: 55), Stenocrates clipeatus is often confused with S. rufipennis due to the drawings of the parameres in Endrödi (1966a: 424). Stenocrates rufipennis is a common species in at least French Guiana and Suriname, while S. clipeatus may well be restricted to Peru and neighboring Andean countries. Unfortunately, Dupuis (2016b: 103) adds to the confusion by placing “ Essequibo,” the origin of the lectotype of S. rufipennis , in Peru, rather than in Guyana as correctly indicated by Endrödi (1966a: 435). We regard S. clipeatus as not occurring in the research area. All records of this species for the research area likely concern S. rufipennis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenocrates clipeatus Endrödi, 1966
Hielkema, Auke J. & Hielkema, Meindert A. 2019 |
Stenocrates clipeatus Endrödi 1966a: 424 ( Peru )
Endrodi, S. 1966: 424 |