Phyllomedusa tarsius (Castanho and De Luca, 2001)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2005)294[0001:SROTFF]2.0.CO;2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5457806 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887A5-FF9B-8922-FD60-FAC8CFE8FDF3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phyllomedusa tarsius |
status |
|
Phyllomedusa tarsius View in CoL Group
DIAGNOSIS: We are not aware of any synapomorphy supporting the monophyly of this group.
COMMENTS: We included a single species of this group, and as such we did not test its monophyly, but we continue to recognize it following De la Riva (1999) until its monophyly is rigorously tested.
CONTENTS: Four species. Phyllomedusa boliviana Boulenger, 1902 ; Phyllomedusa camba De la Riva, 2000 ; Phyllomedusa sauvagii Boulenger, 1882 ; Phyllomedusa tarsius (Cope, 1868) .
Species of Phyllomedusa Unassigned to Group
There are several species that are currently not assigned to any group. These are: Phyllomedusa atelopoides Duellman, Cadle, and Cannatella, 1988 ; Phyllomedusa bicolor (Boddaert, 1772) ; Phyllomedusa coelestis (Cope, 1874) ; Phyllomedusa palliata Peters , ‘‘1872’’ [1873]; Phyllomedusa tomopterna (Cope, 1868) ; Phyllomedusa trinitatis Mertens, 1926 ; Phyllomedusa vaillanti Boulenger, 1882 ; and Phyllomedusa venusta Duellman and Trueb, 1967 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.