Scinax uruguayus (Schmidt, 1944) FAIVOVICH & HADDAD & GARCIA & FROST & CAMPBELL & WHEELER, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2005)294[0001:SROTFF]2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887A5-FFB0-8937-FD67-F9ADCA59FDD6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Scinax uruguayus |
status |
|
Scinax uruguayus View in CoL Group
DIAGNOSIS: Putative morphological synapomorphies of this group include the bicol ored iris and the presence of two keratinized and pigmented plates on the sides of the low er jaw sheath (Kolenc et al., ‘‘2003’’ [2004]).
COMMENTS: The marginal papillae of the posterior margin of the oral disc being larger than those of the lateral margins (Kolenc et al., ‘‘2003’’ [2004]) and the reduction in toe webbing could be other synapomorphies of the group.
CONTENTS: Two species. Scinax pinima (Bokermann and Sazima, 1973) new comb.; Scinax uruguayus (Schmidt, 1944) new comb.
Species of the Scinax ruber Clade Unassigned to a Species Group
We follow Faivovich (2002) in not recognizing the former Scinax ruber and S. staufferi groups, as both were not monophyletic on his analysis. We are considering all species formerly included in these groups as members of the S. ruber clade, although we consider them as unassigned to any group. These species are Scinax acuminatus (Cope, 1862) ; Scinax altae (Dunn, 1933) ; Scinax alter (B. Lutz, 1973) ; Scinax auratus (Wied Neuwied, 1821); Scinax baumgardneri (Rivero, 1961) ; Scinax blairi (Fouquette and Pyburn, 1972) ; Scinax boesemani (Goin, 1966) ; Scinax caldarum (B. Lutz, 1968) ; Scinax cardosoi (Carvalho e Silva and Peixoto, 1991) ; Scinax castroviejoi De la Riva, 1993 ; Scinax chiquitanus (De la Riva, 1990) ; Scinax crospedospilus (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax cruentommus (Duellman, 1972) ; Scinax curicica Pugliese, Pombal, and Sazima, 2004 ; Scinax cuspidatus (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax danae (Duellman, 1986) ; Scinax dolloi (Werner, 1898) new comb.; Scinax duartei (B. Lutz, 1951) ; Scinax elaeochrous (Cope, 1875) ; Scinax eurydice (Bokermann, 1964) ; Scinax exiguus (Duellman, 1986) ; Scinax flavidus La Marca, 2004 ; Scinax funereus (Cope, 1874) ; Scinax fuscomarginatus (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax fuscovarius (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax granulatus (Peters, 1871) ; Scinax hayii (Barbour, 1909) ; Scinax ictericus Duellman and Wiens, 1993 ; Scinax karenanneae (Pyburn, 1992) comb. nov.; Scinax lindsayi Pyburn, 1992 ; Scinax manriquei BarrioAmorós , Orellana, and Chacon, 2004; Scinax maracaya (Cardoso and Sazima, 1980) ; Scinax nasicus (Cope, 1862) ; Scinax oreites Duellman and Wiens, 1993 ; Scinax pachycrus (MirandaRibeiro, 1937) ; Scinax parkeri (Gaige, 1926) ; Scinax perereca Pombal, Haddad, and Kasahara, 1995 ; Scinax quinquefasciatus (Fowler, 1913) ; Scinax rub er (Laurenti, 1768); Scinax similis (Cochran, 1952) ; Scinax squalirostris (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax staufferi (Cope, 1865) ; Scinax trilineatus (Hoogmoed and Gorzula, 1977) ; Scinax wandae (Pyburn and Fouquette, 1971) ; Scinax xsignatus (Spix, 1824) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.