Ceratoculicoidespropinquus, Fasbender, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.875.2147 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:32FA008C-B35D-483C-9DBE-1DCCD0868FAC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8083810 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E8A43CD5-482E-4376-8AAB-FBC676694752 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:E8A43CD5-482E-4376-8AAB-FBC676694752 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ceratoculicoidespropinquus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ceratoculicoidespropinquus sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E8A43CD5-482E-4376-8AAB-FBC676694752
Figs 5c View Fig , 10i–k View Fig
Diagnosis
Male
Ceratoculicoides propinquus sp. nov. can be separated from congeners by the following combination of characters: femora and tibiae brown; wing length ~ 0.95 mm; apices of parameres acute, tapering distally; aedeagus lateral margins straight, apical and posterolateral points adjacent, without accessory spines, posterolateral point subtriangular, apex directed anteriorly ( Fig. 10k View Fig ).
Female
Unknown.
Etymology
The specific epithet ‘ propinquus ’ is a Latin adjective expressing ‘closeness’ or ‘kinship’, which refers to the similarity of this species with C. sp. M1 and C.moravicus .
Material examined
Holotype
USA • ♂; California, Los Angeles Co., Pine Canyon ; 13 Jun. 1953; W.A. McDonald leg.; USNM.
Paratype
CANADA • ♂; British Columbia, 23 km NW of Port Renfrew, Upper Carmanah Valley ; 16–30 Aug. 1991; N. Winchester leg.; CNCI.
Description (male)
MEASUREMENTS (n = 2). Head width 270–286; flagellomeres 44–47, 21–26, 21–25, 25, 21–22, 19–22, 22– 23, 27–30, 27–28, 29–32, 77, 51–63, 64–71; AR 0.74–0.76; FR 1.68–1.7; wing length 0.94–0.96 mm; wing width 0.29–0.31; costal ratio 0.53; GCR 1.58–1.7; GSR 1.04–1.05; aedeagus ratio 1.26–1.35.
THORAX. Dorsocentral punctations possibly absent, at most a few spots of thinned cuticle among dorsocentral setae. Legs with femora and tibiae yellow or very lightly infuscate.
GENITALIA ( Fig. 10i–k View Fig ). Distal portion of parameres tapering gradually to acute apex. Aedeagus lateral margins straight, becoming slightly divergent at apex; posterior margin a smooth concave arc, hyaline medial incision broadest posteriorly, tapering anteriorly; base of posterolateral point directed laterally, apex rounded, directed anterolaterally; apical point subacute, directed posterolaterally, adjacent to posterolateral point, without accessory spines between apical and posterolateral points, similar in size and shape to apical point.
Distribution
British Columbia ( Canada), California ( USA) ( Fig. 13 View Fig ).
Remarks
This species belongs to the C. moravicus group, and is very similar to C. aliciae , C. sp. M1 and C. moravicus . It can be recognized by the straight lateral margins of the aedeagus (vs distinctly tapering at midlength in C.aliciae and C.moravicus ) and the apical and posterolateral points being adjacent but without accessory spines between them (spines present in C. sp. M1 and C.moravicus ), and the posterolateral point apex rounded and directed anteriorly ( Fig. 10k View Fig ). The posterior margin of the aedeagus forms an evenly concave arc, while C. aliciae has a distinct acute medial notch along its posterior margin ( Fig. 10e View Fig ). Females have not been associated for this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |