Polysphincta boops Tschek, 1869
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3955.3.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:61E33C29-94BF-4CA5-AF64-D0EC921AD6EB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6097846 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887FC-0F42-A60D-FF10-FA916E2D9E34 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Polysphincta boops Tschek, 1869 |
status |
|
Polysphincta boops Tschek, 1869 View in CoL
Polysphincta asiatica Kusigemati, 1984 View in CoL , syn. nov.
Taxon discussion. According to the original description ( Kusigemati, 1984), P. asiatica View in CoL is morphologically close to the Holarctic P. t ub e ros a Gravenhorst, 1829, but differs by the complete and strong pleural carina and the form of the propodeum which is very sparsely punctate anteriorly and smooth posteriorly. Kasparyan and Khalaim (2007) placed P. asiatica View in CoL in a species group along with P. tuberosa View in CoL which also has the pleural carina absent. They also provided the yellow-brownish bases of metasomal tergites 2–5 as an additional distinguishing feature for P. asiatica View in CoL .
Our examination of the type materials of P. asiatica View in CoL demonstrated that this species has the pleural carina complete ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 d) and all metasomal tergites black ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 e). Both P. boops View in CoL (holotype and materials collected in Carpathians by the first author), and P. asiatica View in CoL have the mandibles, scape and pedicel, tegula, subtegular ridge, scutellum, metascutellum, and legs largely yellow.
According to Fritzén and Shaw (2014) the main differences between two closely related species, P. boops View in CoL and P. l o ng a, Kasparyan, 1976, are the number of flagellomeres (at most 28 in P. boops View in CoL and at least 28 in P. l o ng a), the pubescence of mesoscutum (more pubescent in P. longa View in CoL ) and the size of eyes (larger in P. longa View in CoL ). The mesoscutum of P. asiatica View in CoL is closely pubescent only anteriorly ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 c) as in P. boops View in CoL ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 b, c, d). We found a new useful character, the length and the curvature of the central lobe of the mesoscutum, which seems to be the same in both P. asiatica View in CoL and P. boops View in CoL . The central lobe of the mesoscutum is generally shorter and more rounded ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 c, d, 4d, 5b, d, 6a) compared to P. longa View in CoL , which has a more elongate, generally flatter central lobe of mesoscutum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 b).
The sculpture of metasoma in P. boops View in CoL and P. asiatica View in CoL is similar, metasomal tergites 3–5, anteriorly between swellings, somewhat indistinctly granulate with small punctures and impunctate on swellings (not visible on images). The ovipositor in examined specimens of both P. boops View in CoL and P. longa View in CoL , is about 1.15–1.3 times the length of the hind tibia. According to Kusigemati (1984), the ovipositor sheaths in P. asiatica View in CoL vary from 1.1–1.4 times the length of hind tibia, P. asiatica View in CoL is therefore assumed to be a junior synonym (syn. nov.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Polysphincta boops Tschek, 1869
Varga, Oleksandr & Reshchikov, Alexey 2015 |
Polysphincta asiatica
Kusigemati 1984 |