Eumachia frutescens (C.T. White) Barrabé, C.M. Taylor & Razafim. 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15553/c2017v722a6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6080712 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D98799-A474-FFB2-FF87-FECEFE91FC12 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Eumachia frutescens (C.T. White) Barrabé, C.M. Taylor & Razafim. |
status |
comb. nov. |
58. Eumachia frutescens (C.T. White) Barrabé, C.M. Taylor & Razafim. View in CoL , comb. nov.
Ξ Hodgkinsonia frutescens C.T. White in Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland 53: 220. 1942 View in CoL .
Lectotypus (designated here): AUSTRALIA. Queensland: Yungaburra, 24.XII.1939, Flecker s.n. ( BRI [ BRI- AQ0317424 ] image seen; isolecto-: CNS [QRS14066] image seen) . Syntypus: AUSTRALIA. Queensland: Atherton, Cook Pastoral District , XI-XII, A.L. Merrotsy s.n. ( BRI [ BRI-AQ0318037 ] image seen) .
Notes. – This species is endemic to northeastern Australia ( GOVAERTS et al., 2015). Two syntypes were cited in the protologue. The Flecker collection is preferred over the Merrotsy collection as the type because it is in a better state of conservation. The duplicate of this collection at BRI [BRI- AQ0317424 ] is designated as the lectotype because it has more buds and flowers, and is generally in a better state of conservation.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eumachia frutescens (C.T. White) Barrabé, C.M. Taylor & Razafim.
Taylor, Charlotte M., Razafimandimbison, Sylvain G., Barrabé, Laure, Jardim, Jomar G. & Barbosa, Maria Regina V. 2017 |
Hodgkinsonia frutescens C.T. White in Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland 53: 220. 1942
C. T. White 1942: 220 |