Amphidromus (Amphidromus) laosianus Bavay, 1898
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.330 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FDFA7FAC-FC92-404B-9058-A426DAB6C693 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3848195 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DAD35F-692F-EF01-FE5E-AD4BFABF23D0 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Amphidromus (Amphidromus) laosianus Bavay, 1898 |
status |
|
Amphidromus (Amphidromus) laosianus Bavay, 1898 View in CoL
Amphidromus laosianus Bavay, 1898: 15 View in CoL , 16, pl. 2, fig. 1, 1a. Type locality: Khône, sur les bords du Mékong [on the banks of the Mekong River, Khone, Champasak, Laos].
Amphidromus laosianus var. albocaerulescens Bavay, 1898: 16 View in CoL , pl. 2, fig. 2, 2a. Type locality: Khône, sur les bords du Mékong [on the banks of the Mekong River, Khone, Champasak, Laos].
Amphidromus laosianus View in CoL – Pilsbry 1900: 183, 184, pl. 62, figs 60–61. — Laidlaw & Solem 1961: 526, 634.
Amphidromus laosianus var. albocaerulescens View in CoL – Pilsbry 1900: 184, pl. 62, figs 62–63. — Laidlaw & Solem 1961: 526, 598.
Material examined
LAOS: 1D + 1S shells ( Fig. 4G View Fig ), Khone District, Champasak, South Laos ( RMNH 101049); 1D + 2S shells, W.J.M. Maassen collection; 2D + 2D juveniles, Khone, South Laos, ZMB, Lehmann collection.
Remarks
Currently known only from the type locality. The unique shell characters are chirally dimorphic, conical to elongate conical; whorls weakly convex, with white subsutural band. Shell color with yellowishbrown or brownish radial streaks on pinkish to whitish ground color; dark varix present. Aperture elongated; peristome thickened, expanded and reflected; lip folded and pinkish. Parietal callus pinkish and thickened; columella pinkish and straight; umbilicus imperforated.
Laidlaw & Solem (1961) mentioned that this species is similar to the A. atricallosus leucoxanthus variety “ laidlawi ” ( Solem 1965: pl. 1, fig. 3; Sutcharit & Panha 2006: fig. 4d–e). However, it differs in having a slender shell and pinkish peristome, parietal callus and inside of the aperture, while “ var. laidlawi ” has a white lip, parietal callus and inside aperture, and more depressed suture. Furthermore, A. cambojiensis (Reeve, 1860) can be distinguished from this species by having a very large and thickened shell, thickened and white parietal callus and lip, and purplish inside aperture (see Sutcharit et al. 2015).
RMNH |
National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amphidromus (Amphidromus) laosianus Bavay, 1898
Inkhavilay, Khamla, Sutcharit, Chirasak & Panha, Somsak 2017 |
Amphidromus laosianus
Laidlaw F. F. & Solem A. 1961: 526 |
Pilsbry H. A. 1900: 183 |
Amphidromus laosianus var. albocaerulescens
Laidlaw F. F. & Solem A. 1961: 526 |
Pilsbry H. A. 1900: 184 |
Amphidromus laosianus
Bavay A. 1898: 15 |
Amphidromus laosianus var. albocaerulescens
Bavay A. 1898: 16 |