Amphidromus (Syndromus) flavus (Pfeiffer, 1861)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.330 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FDFA7FAC-FC92-404B-9058-A426DAB6C693 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3848205 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DAD35F-6931-EF11-FE67-AC14FB772288 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Amphidromus (Syndromus) flavus (Pfeiffer, 1861) |
status |
|
Amphidromus (Syndromus) flavus (Pfeiffer, 1861) View in CoL
Figs 1 View Fig , 9B View Fig , 10 View Fig E−K, 11C–D, 12A−C; Table 1 View Table 1
Bulimus flavus Pfeiffer, 1861a: 194 . Type locality: Siam [ Thailand].
Amphidromus flavus var. proxima Fulton, 1896: 81 View in CoL , pl. 6, fig. 4. Type locality: Unknown. Sutcharit et al. 2015: 85, fig. 13c.
Amphidromus xiengensis var. tryoni Pilsbry, 1900: 196–197 View in CoL , pl. 63, fig. 78. Type locality: Laos Mountains, Cambodia.
Amphidromus sinensis var. indistinctus Pilsbry, 1900: 192 View in CoL , pl. 62, fig. 70. Type locality: Laos Mountains, Cambodia.
Bulimus flavus – Pfeiffer 1861b: 171, pl. 46, figs 7–8. — Morelet 1875: 265.
Amphidromus flavus View in CoL – Fulton 1896: 81. — Ancey 1898: 134. — Pilsbry 1900: 197–198, pl. 63, figs 92–93. — Laidlaw & Solem 1961: 563–564, 619.
Amphidromus flavus var. proximus – Pilsbry, 1900: 198, pl. 63, fig. 94.
Amphidromus xiengensis var. proxima View in CoL – Laidlaw & Solem 1961: 565, 652.
Material examined
Type material
THAILAND: Lectotype, NHMUK 19601436 ( Sutcharit et al. 2015: fig. 7i); paralectotype, NHMUK 19601437 (1 shell).
UNKNOWN LOCALITY: Holotype of var. “ proxima ” Fulton, 1896, NHMUK 1896.6.13.48 ( Sutcharit et al. 2015: fig. 13c).
CAMBODIA: Holotype of var. “ indistinctus ” Pilsbry, 1900, ANSP 31486 About ANSP ( Fig. 10 H View Fig ).
CAMBODIA: Lectotype of var. “ tryoni ” Pilsbry, 1900, ANSP 31488 About ANSP ( Fig. 10 I View Fig ); paralectoypes, ANSP 252745 About ANSP (2 shells, Fig. 10 J View Fig ).
Other material
LAOS: 5 shells, park at the temple mountain, Luang Phrabang ( NHMUK ex. Brandt collection No. 17320); 20 shells, Tempelberg (Temple Mount), Luang Phrabang ( ZMB ex. Lehmann collection); 33 shells, Wat Phousy (temple), Luang Phrabang ( CUMZ 7025); 3 shells ( Fig. 10 K View Fig , CUMZ 7026), 7 specimens, in ethanol ( Figs 9 B View Fig , 11 View Fig C–D, 12A−C, CUMZ 7027), Ban Na Deauy, Luang Phrabang District, Luang Phrabang; 5 shells, Mouhot’s Tomb, E bank of Kan River, Luang Phrabang District, Luang Phrabang ( CUMZ 7028); 16 shells ( Fig. 10 View Fig E−G), Tam Pou Kham, Vang Vieng District, Vientiane ( CUMZ 7029).
Description
Shell sinistral, small, ovate conical, small, thin and glossy. Spire conical; apex acute yellowish, with black spot on tip. Whorls 5 and 6 convex; suture depressed; last whorl rounded to well rounded. Periostracum transparent to thin corneous. Last whorl processes uniform yellowish; Bands 1 to 3 usually absent; Bands 4 and 5 absent or present with indistinct bands; Band 6 usually absent or sometimes present as scantly reddish band. Parietal callus thin and transparent.Aperture ovate to sub-ovate; peristome weakly thickened and shortly expanded; lip whitish. Columella straight and white. Umbilicus opened to narrowly opened. Radula
Teeth arranged in V-shaped rows, each row contains about 166 (84-(7-10)-1-(8-12)-81) teeth. Central tooth tricuspid; mesocone of triangular shape; ectocones small, with pointed cusp. Lateral teeth tricuspid; endocone small and rounded cusps; mesocone large and truncated cusp; ectocone very small, pointed cusp and located at base of teeth. Lateral teeth gradually transformed to elongated marginal teeth. Marginal teeth tricuspid, start around tooth number 8 to 12; endocone elongate with dull cusps and separated from mesocome by wide notch; mesocone large, elongate and curved cusps; ectocone small, with pointed cusps or sometimes serrated shape ( Fig. 12 View Fig A−C).
Genital organs
Atrium (at) rather long (n = 5). Penis (p) long, cylindrical and enlarged from middle to end. Epiphallus (e) cylindrical, length longer than that of penis; flagellum (fl) short and one fourth as long as epiphallus; appendix absent. Penial retractor muscle (pr) thickened and relatively short. Vas deferens (vd) small tube, connecting epiphallus and free oviduct ( Fig. 11C View Fig ).
Internal penial wall corrugated into thin penial pilasters, which form fringe around penial verge. Penial verge conical, with smooth surface and orifice open near tip ( Fig. 11D View Fig ).
Vagina cylindrical, long, slender about two times as long as penis length. Gametolytic duct long, proximal to genital orifice almost same diameter as vagina, distally tapering; distal to genital orifice small tube of about same length as proximal part and connected to gametolytic sac. Oviduct and albumin gland small ( Fig. 11C View Fig ).
Internally, vaginal wall shows longitudinal vaginal pilasters (vp); pilasters very narrow and thin ( Fig. 11D View Fig ).
Distribution
The distribution range of the species is from Vientiane to Luang Phrabang Provinces.
Remarks
Amphidromus flavus differs from A. sinensis (Benson, 1851) in having a smaller shell, the spire more ovate and conical, with a single reddish band on the penultimate whorl. It can be distinguished from A. xiengensis in having a smaller shell, ovate conical, without any band on yellowish ground color or on shell sculpture. It differs from A. globonevilli Sutcharit & Panha, 2015 by having a larger shell size, and it is smaller than A. principalis Sutcharit & Panha, 2015 . In comparison, A. globonevilli has an elongate conical shell and a faint yellow spiral band below the periphery, while A. principalis has a more elongate conical shell, last whorl without any band, aperture ovate. In our collection we found two types identified as A. flavus and A. flavus var. “ proxima ”, living sympatrically at Luang Phrabang and Vang Vieng.
Three subspecific entities have been proposed; however, we recognize them as a single biological species, A. flavus .
1. Typical form: monochrome yellowish shell and Bands 1 to 6 absent ( Sutcharit et al. 2015: fig. 7i–j, for the lectotype and paralectotype).
2. var. “ proxima ” Fulton, 1896: monochrome yellowish shell, Bands 4 and 5 are indistinct pale brownish bands ( Sutcharit et al. 2015: fig. 13c, for the holotype).
3. var. “ tryoni ” Pilsbry, 1900: Band 1 yellowish, Bands 2 and 3 absent, Bands 4 and 5 brownish and Band 6 absent. In some specimens, brownish blotches of Bands 2 and 3 present in the earlier whorls and disappeared in the penultimate and last whorls ( Fig. 10 View Fig I−K).
4. var. “ indistinctus ” Pilsbry, 1900: identical to var. “ proxima Fulton, 1896 ” ( Fig. 10H View Fig ).
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
H |
University of Helsinki |
I |
"Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University |
J |
University of the Witwatersrand |
ZMB |
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections) |
CUMZ |
Cameroon University, Museum of Zoology |
K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
B |
Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitaet |
E |
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amphidromus (Syndromus) flavus (Pfeiffer, 1861)
Inkhavilay, Khamla, Sutcharit, Chirasak & Panha, Somsak 2017 |
Amphidromus xiengensis var. proxima
Laidlaw F. F. & Solem A. 1961: 565 |
Amphidromus xiengensis var. tryoni
Pilsbry H. A. 1900: 197 |
Amphidromus sinensis var. indistinctus
Pilsbry H. A. 1900: 192 |
Amphidromus flavus var. proximus
Pilsbry H. A. 1900: 198 |
Amphidromus flavus var. proxima
Sutcharit C. & Ablett J. & Tongkerd P. & Naggs F. & Panha S. 2015: 85 |
Fulton H. C. 1896: 81 |
Amphidromus flavus
Laidlaw F. F. & Solem A. 1961: 563 |
Pilsbry H. A. 1900: 197 |
Ancey C. F. 1898: 134 |
Fulton H. C. 1896: 81 |
Bulimus flavus
Pfeiffer L. 1861: 194 |
Bulimus flavus
Morelet A. 1875: 265 |
Pfeiffer L. 1861: 171 |