Trupanea Schrank
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3821.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1249EDEE-817D-45E3-B564-26A55411A508 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6135357 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DC5619-4C5B-3D2F-81F9-FF002D95C62E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trupanea Schrank |
status |
|
Trupanea Schrank 1795: 147 View in CoL . Type species— radiata Schrank (= stellata Fuesslin View in CoL ), by monotypy.
Celidosphenella Hendel 1914a: 86 View in CoL . Type species— maculata Hendel View in CoL , by original designation. New synonym. Melanotrypana Hering 1944: 14 . Type species— Acanthiophilus benoisti Séguy View in CoL , by original designation. New synonym.
Celidosphenella View in CoL was proposed by Hendel (1914a) in a key to genera of Tephritidae View in CoL , and again by Hendel (1914b), with C. maculata Hendel View in CoL from Chile as type species. It was not compared with Trupanea View in CoL , but of the characters in the description and key, the main difference is that the wing pattern was “spotted, rather than stellate as in Trupanea View in CoL . Foote (1980) also considered the wing pattern significant and included species with a solid dark mark on the pterostigma and the area posterior to it, and a rectangular hyaline area distal to it. He included the Trupanea diespasmena group sensu Aczél (1953) in the synonymy of Celidosphenella View in CoL , although he did not list the individual species. He also considered Melanotrypana Hering (1944) , with type species Acanthiophilus benoisti Séguy View in CoL , a synonym of Celidosphenella View in CoL , although the latter species has a somewhat different, more interrupted wing pattern. Aczél (1953) considered Melanotrypana a subgenus of Trupanea View in CoL .
The type species of Celidophenella, C. maculata View in CoL , possesses the character states considered synapomorphies of the Trupanea View in CoL clade as recognized by Merz (1999). The acrophallus of the glans in the male terminalia is reduced; and the glans has a single, strongly sclerotized, movable, hooklike sclerite. Except perhaps in wing pattern, C. maculata View in CoL otherwise falls within the traditional concept of Trupanea View in CoL ( Foote et al. 1993, Norrbom 2010). It has 3 frontal setae, 2 orbital setae, and the apical scutellar setae are absent. The body is densely gray microtrichose. In C. maculata View in CoL the apical rays of the wing pattern are reduced to spots at the apices of veins R4+5 and M, but its wing pattern certainly can be considered to be a modified stellate pattern. Its pattern is intermediate between typical Trupanea View in CoL species and those of some of the other species that Foote (1967, 1980) included in Celidosphenella View in CoL that have a more extensively dark pattern. The stellate pattern was considered by Merz (1999) a synapomorphy either of Trupanea View in CoL or a higher taxon within the Tephritis View in CoL group of genera in which Trupanea View in CoL is included. Although the majority of species of Trupanea View in CoL have a stellate pattern, there is considerable variation, particularly among the Neotropical species, and therefore we do not exclude those that otherwise fit the concept of the genus in chaetotaxy and genitalic characters. We have observed no characters that indicate that Trupanea View in CoL without the inclusion of C. maculata View in CoL and similar species is a monophyletic group, and we therefore consider Celidosphenella View in CoL a subjective junior synonym of Trupanea View in CoL . Although we have not examined A. benoisti Séguy View in CoL , the type species of Melanotrypana , it is consistent with Trupanea View in CoL in chaetotaxy and probably falls within the concept of the genus. Study of its terminalia is needed to confirm this synonymy.
Merz (1999) considered the reduced size of the lower calypter to be a synapomorphy of Trupanea View in CoL . The calypter is no larger in C. maculata View in CoL than in T. stellata (Fuesslin) View in CoL or T. desertorum (Efflatoun) , the species included in his matrix, however, it is similar in size in the other Tephritini View in CoL genera that we compared ( Dioxyna View in CoL , Dyseuaresta View in CoL , Neotephritis View in CoL ), so this is questionably a phylogenetically significant character at this level.
The following new or restored combinations are proposed for the species that have been classified in Celidosphenella View in CoL (see Norrbom et al. 1999, Norrbom 2004) (original genus in parentheses): Trupanea bella (Blanchard 1852) (Acinia) ; T. benoisti (Séguy 1933) (Acanthiophilus) View in CoL ; T. diespasmena (Schiner 1868) (Tephritis) ; T. maculata (Hendel 1914) (Celidosphenella) View in CoL ; T. poecila (Schiner 1868) (Sphenella) View in CoL ; T. simulata Malloch 1933 (Trypanea) ; T. stonei Stuardo 1946 (Trupanea) View in CoL (= T. diversa Malloch 1933 View in CoL ); and T. vidua Hering 1942 (Trypanea) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Trupanea Schrank
Norrbom, Allen L. & Neder, Lilia Estela 2014 |
Celidosphenella
Hendel 1914: 86 |