Syringophilinae

Skoracki, Maciej, 2011, Quill mites (Acari: Syringophilidae) of the Palaearctic region 2840, Zootaxa 2840 (1), pp. 1-414 : 34-35

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2840.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DC87DB-FFAD-FF9D-70B5-FF0EFA3DFCE2

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Syringophilinae
status

 

Key to genera of the subfamily Syringophilinae View in CoL .

*—Palaearctic genera

1. Setae vi absent...................................................................................... 2

– Setae vi present...................................................................................... 11

2. Setae dFII absent..................................................................................... 3

– Setae dFII present..................................................................................... 8

3. Setae dFIII and dFIV present but replaced ventrally … / COLUMBIFORMES View in CoL , PSITTACIFORMES View in CoL /................................................................................... Terratosyringophilus Bochkov and Perez 2002 View in CoL

– Setae dFIII and dFIV absent............................................................................ 4

4. Setae ve and si situated at same transverse level. Pocket-like structures in anterior part of propodonotum present. Stylophore constricted posteriorly … / PSITTACIFORMES View in CoL /...................... Psittaciphilus Fain, Bochkov and Mironov, 2000 View in CoL

– Setae ve situated anteriorly to level of setae si. Pocket-like structures absent. Stylophore rounded posteriorly............ 5

5. Hypostomal apex smooth. Apodemes I divergent, not fused to apodemes II … / COLUMBIFORMES View in CoL /..................................................................................... Meitingsunes Glowska and Skoracki, 2010 *

– Hypostomal apex ornamented by 2 pairs of median sausage-like protuberances. Apodemes I and II parallel and fused to each other................................................................................................6

6. Setal pattern of propodonotal region arranged 2–3 … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /............ Neoperisterophila Skoracki, 2005 View in CoL

– Setal pattern of propodonotal region arranged 2–1–2.......................................................... 7

7. Legs I and II subequal in size … / COLUMBIFORMES, FALCONIFORMES View in CoL /.............. Peristerophila Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– Legs I 1.5 times longer than legs II................................... / COLUMBIFORMES View in CoL , PSITTACIFORMES View in CoL /................................................................ Castosyringophilus Bochkov and Perez, 2002 View in CoL

8. Setae dGII present. Apodemes I parallel.................................................................... 9

– Setae dGII absent. Apodemes I divergent … / GALLIFORMES View in CoL /............... Galliphilopsis Skoracki and Sikora 2004 View in CoL *

9. Setae l’RI and l’RII absent … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /..................................... Aulonastus Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– Setae l’RI and l’RII present............................................................................ 10

10. Two pairs of pseudanal setae (ps1 and ps2) present … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /.............. Neoaulonastus Skoracki, 1999 View in CoL *

– One pair of pseudanal setae present (ps2 absent) … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /.................. Krantziaulonastus View in CoL gen. nov. *

11. Some of leg setae absent.............................................................................. 12

– Legs with full complement of setae...................................................................... 27

12. Setae dGII absent.................................................................................... 13

– Setae dGII present................................................................................... 17

13. Setae vsI absent...................................... / CHARADRIIFORMES / … Philoxanthornea Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– Setae vsI present..................................................................................... 14

14. Setae l’GIV present................................................................................... 15

– Setae l’GIV absent................................................................................... 16

15. Two pairs of pseudanal setae present … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /........................ Syringophiloidus Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– One pair of pseudanal setae present (ps2 absent) … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /................ Betasyringophiloidus gen. nov. *

16. Apodemes I parallel fused to apodemes II … / APODIFORMES View in CoL /......... Apodisyringophilus Skoracki and OConnor, 2010

– Apodemes I distinctly divergent, not fused to apodemes II … / APODIFORMES View in CoL /.......... Apodisyringiana Skoracki, 2005 View in CoL

17. Setae dFII absent.................................................................................... 18

– Setae dFII present.................................................................................... 19

18. Setae dTIII and dTIV present. Propodonotal shield divided longitudinally … / GRUIFORMES View in CoL /... Ascetomylla Kethley, 1970 View in CoL

– Setae dTIII and dTIV absent. Propodonotal shield entire … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL / … Fritschisyringophilus Bochkov, Fain and Skoracki, 2004 View in CoL

19. Setae dTIII absent.................................................................................... 20

– Setae dTIII present................................................................................... 21

20. Setae vsII present. Apodemes I parallel … / PSITTACIFORMES View in CoL /.......... Neoaulobia Fain, Bochkov and Mironov, 2000 View in CoL

– Setae vsII absent. Apodemes I divergent … / CUCULIFORMES View in CoL /.................. Cuculisyringophilus Skoracki, 2008 View in CoL *

21. Setae vsI absent..................................................................................... 22

– Setae vsI present..................................................................................... 23

22. Apodemes I parallel. Stylophore constricted posteriorly. Claws strongly recurved … / CHARADRIIFORMES /................................................................................. Bochkovia Skoracki and OConnor, 2010

– Apodemes I divergent. Stylophore rounded posteriorly. Claws typically opened … / CHARADRIIFORMES /............................................................................................. Paraniglarobia gen. nov. *

23. Setae vsII absent, l’GIV present......................................................................... 24

– Setae vsII present, l’GIV absent … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /................ Neosyringophilopsis Skoracki and Sikora, 2005 View in CoL *

24. Lateral hypostomal teeth present… / PELECANIFORMES View in CoL , CICONIIFORMES View in CoL /.............. Stibarokris Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– Lateral hypostomal teeth absent......................................................................... 25

25. Two pairs of genital setae present (g1, g2). Apodemes I not fused to apodemes II.................................. 26

– One pair of genital setae present (g2 absent). Apodemes I fused to apodemes II … /PROCELALLARIFORMES/............................................................................... Procellariisyringophilus Kethley, 1970

26. Apodemes I divergent. Stylophore with large tip on posterior margin. Claws without basal angle … / CICONIIFORMES View in CoL /.................................................................. Ciconichenophilus Skoracki and OConnor, 2010

– Apodemes I parallel. Stylophore without large tip on posterior margin. Claws with basal angle … / CHARADRIIFORMES /................................................................................. Niglarobia Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

27. Aggenital series with 4–9 pairs of setae................................................................... 28

– Two or 3 pairs of aggenital setae present.................................................................. 29

28. Coxal fields I and II similar in size and shape. Supernumerary setae vsIII absent. Legs I thicker than II–IV................ / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /.............................................................. Torotrogla Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– Coxal fields I and II disimilar in size and shape. Supernumerary setae vsIII present. Legs I–IV subequal................. / CICONIIFORMES View in CoL /............................................................. Trypetoptila Kethley, 1970 View in CoL

29. Three pairs of aggenital setae (ag1–3) present.............................................................. 32

– Two pairs of aggenital setae present (setae ag2 absent)....................................................... 30

30. Apodemes I not fused to apodemes II. Claws typically opened................................................ 31

– Apodemes I fused to apodemes II. Claws strongly recurved … / CHARADRIIFORMES /..... Kethleyana Kivganov, 1995 View in CoL *

31. Hysteronotal shield not fused to pygidial shield. Coxal fields of legs I and II are similar in the size and shape, apodemes of legs III and IV well developed … / PICIFORMES View in CoL /.......................... Picisyringophilus Skoracki and OConnor, 2010

– Hysteronotal shield fused to pygidial shield. Coxal fields of legs I and II are dissimilar in size and shape. Apodemes of legs III and IV absent … / GALLIFORMES View in CoL /...................................... Mironovia Chirov and Kravtsova, 1995 View in CoL *

32. Lateral hypostomal teeth present … / GALLIFORMES View in CoL /.................................. Colinophilus Kethley, 1970 View in CoL

– Lateral hypostomal teeth absent......................................................................... 33

33. Peritremes U-shaped … / GALLIFORMES View in CoL /.......................................... Syringophilus Heller, 1880 View in CoL *

– Peritremes M-shaped.................................................................................. 34

34. Coxal fields I and II similar in size and shape.............................................................. 35

– Coxal fields I and II dissimilar in size and shape............................................................ 37

35. Setae f2 short (2–3 times shorter than c1). Setae si situated anterior to level of setae se … / ANSERIFORMES View in CoL /........................................................................................... Chenophila Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– Setae f2 long (longer than c1). Setae si and se situated at same level........................................... 36

36. Claws broadly open … / CHARADRIIFORMES / ….................................... Selenonycha Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

– Claws strongly recurved … / CHARADRIIFORMES /................................. Creagonycha Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

37. Apodemes I parallel … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL /............................................ Aulobia Kethley, 1970 *

– Apodemes I divergent................................................................................. 38

38. Apodemes I fused to apodemes II........................................................................ 39

– Apodemes I not fused to apodemes II..................................................................... 40

39. Propodonotal shield divided longitudinally … / CUCULIFORMES View in CoL /............. Crotophagisyringophilus Skoracki, 2008 View in CoL

– Propodonotal shield entire … / PASSERIFORMES View in CoL , CORACIIFORMES View in CoL /................ Syringophilopsis Kethley, 1970 *

40. Stylophore rounded posteriorly......................................................................... 41

– Stylophore constricted posteriorly....................................................................... 42

41. Dorsal setae of idiosoma ornamented … / MUSOPHAGIFORMES View in CoL /................ Blaszakia Skoracki and Sikora, 2008 View in CoL

– Dorsal setae of idiosoma smooth … / STRIGIFORMES View in CoL /........................ Bubophilus Philips and Norton, 1978 View in CoL *

42. Apodemes I slightly divergent. Setae se located posterior to level of setae c1 ..................................... 43

– Apodemes I strongly divergent. Setae se located anterior to the level of setae c1 ................................... 45

43. Setae f2 situated distinctly anterior to the level of setae f1 … / CHARADRIIFORMES /............................................................................................. Charadriphilus Bochkov and Chystiakov, 2001 View in CoL *

– Setae f2 situated close to the bases of setae f1 .............................................................. 44

44. Each lateral branch of peritremes reduced to 3 chambers. Setae se and c1 situated at same transverse level. In males 2 pairs of aggenital setae present and setae se situated distinctly anterior to level of setae c1 … / PTEROCLIDIFORMES View in CoL /.................................................................................... Pteroclidisyringophilus gen. nov. *

– Each lateral branch with 7–12 chambers. Setae se situated distinctly posterior to level of setae c1. In males 3 pairs of aggenital setae present and setae se and c1 situated at same transverse level … / GALLIFORMES View in CoL /....... Kalamotrypetes Casto, 1980 View in CoL

45. Setae si and se situated at same level. All terminal setae long … / PSITTACIFORMES View in CoL /....................................................................................... Megasyringophilus Fain, Bochkov and Mironov, 2000 View in CoL *

– Setae si set distinctly anterior to level of setae se, setae f1 and f2 long, setae h1 and h2 short … / TINAMIFORMES View in CoL /.......................................................................... Tinamiphilopsis Skoracki and Sikora, 2004 View in CoL

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF