Myzomorphus poultoni Lameere, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5170497 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:59997D76-5A20-4E80-8038-63985530AC2F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5185100 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DCFE4B-9A4F-FFAC-FF40-57EFFD2D42B4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Myzomorphus poultoni Lameere, 1912 |
status |
|
Myzomorphus poultoni Lameere, 1912 View in CoL
( Fig. 8–14 View Figures 8–14 )
Myzomorphus poultoni Lameere, 1912: 98 View in CoL ; 1913: 91; 1919: 169; Melzer 1919: 161; Blackwelder 1946: 557 (checklist); Gilmour 1960: 20; Galileo 1987: 589; Monné and Giesbert 1994: 19 (checklist); Monné 1995: 75 (cat.); 2006: 22 (cat.); 2015: 84 (cat.).
Lameere (1912) described Myzomorphus poultoni View in CoL as follows (translated): “A male from Brazil at the Museum of Oxford. Length of 10 millimeters, reddish-yellow, with the head, sides of thorax, distal half of metafemora and metatibiae dark; the antennae are dark with whitish lamellae; the elytra are dark with a border and the humerus yellowish. The metatibiae are much dilated, foliaceous, as in the next species [ M. gounellei View in CoL ]. The prosternal process remained wide; the prothorax has no lateral tooth; the pronotum has a central depression limited at both sides by a distinct, smooth and shiny carina. The elytra are short, regularly bent at inner side. The antennae are as long as body, with the lamellae wide and rounded as in previous species [ M. scutellatus Sallé, 1850 View in CoL ; M. quadripunctatus View in CoL ]. The punctation is reticulate on the pronotum and elytra.”
The original description by Lameere (1912) does not agree with the holotype ( Fig. 8–10 View Figures 8–14 ) on the following characters: ventral side of the head mostly yellowish; metatibiae yellowish only on basal third; lamellae partially dark; prothorax has distinct lateral tubercle, although is rounded; antennae longer than body (surpass abdominal apex about apex of antennomere X).
According to Galileo (1987) (translated): “ Lameere (1912) established the species based on a single male from Brazil belonging to the Oxford Museum. According to information by M. J. Scoble, the holotype is not in “Hope Entomological Collection,” Oxford;” and “ M. poultoni has hind tibiae strongly foliaceous and developed and smooth tubercles on pronotum, very close to M. gounellei . No specimens were examined.” However, the specimen ( Fig. 8–11 View Figures 8–14 ) rediscovered at OUMNH is the holotype, as described by Lameere (1912).
Myzomorphus poultoni View in CoL ( Fig. 8–10, 12–14 View Figures 8–14 ) and M. gounellei Lameere, 1912 View in CoL ( Fig. 5–7 View Figures 1–7 , 15–17 View Figures 15–19 ) share as main features the notably foliaceous metatibiae and the shiny carina on each side of the pronotum. These features together allow for the separation of these species from all other known males in the genus. Lameere (1912) separated the two species in his key (translated): “Antennal process [lamella] wide and short; prosternal process wide; elytra short triangle-shaped in male [conducting to M. poultoni View in CoL ] / Antennal process long and slender; prosternal process narrow; elytra elongate in male, not shortened posteriorly, and with expanded margin in female [conducting to M. gounellei View in CoL ].” However, the couplet is flawed. Comparing the lamellae in the holotype of M. poultoni View in CoL ( Fig. 8–10 View Figures 8–14 ) with the syntype male of M. gounellei View in CoL ( Fig. 15–17 View Figures 15–19 ), it is possible to see that they are very similar in size and width (not distinctly different as pointed out by Lameere). Comparing the prosternal process, it is possible to see that they have practically the same width. This was confirmed by examination of a male of M. gounellei View in CoL ( Fig. 5–6 View Figures 1–7 ), and a male of M. poultoni View in CoL ( Fig. 12–14 View Figures 8–14 ), both from MNRJ. The only reliable feature to separate these species is the elytral shape: longer (about 3.0 times as long as largest width), more distinctly narrowed toward apex in M. gounellei View in CoL ; shorter (about 2.5 times as long as largest width), less narrowed toward apex in M. poultoni View in CoL . As this is the only difference, it is not necessary to redescribe the species, because M. gounellei View in CoL was suitably redescribed by Galileo (1987).
Monné and Monné (2011) reported: “ Myzomorphus scutellatus Sallé, 1849 View in CoL / Figures 2A, B View Figures 1–7 ).” A reexamination of the photos of the males figured showed that “ Figure 2A View Figures 1–7 ”, examined by the second author, is a male of M. gounellei View in CoL and is the specimen used to establish the new state record [“ Brazil, São Paulo, Serra da Bocaina (São José Barreiro, 1650 m), male, November 1968, Seabra and Alvarenga col. (MNRJ).”]. In Monné’s (2015) catalogue “ Fig. 2A and 2B View Figures 1–7 ” by Monné and Monné (2011) is referenced for both M. scutellatus View in CoL and M. gounellei View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Myzomorphus poultoni Lameere, 1912
Spooner, Amoret & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2016 |
Myzomorphus poultoni
Monne, M. A. 1995: 75 |
Monne, M. A. & Giesbert, E. F. 1994: 19 |
Galileo, M. H. M. 1987: 589 |
Gilmour, E. F. 1960: 20 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1946: 557 |
Lameere, A. A. 1919: 169 |
Melzer, J. 1919: 161 |
Lameere, A. A. 1913: 91 |
Lameere, A. A. 1912: 98 |